毛里求斯2型糖尿病管理需要固定剂量组合(FDC)

Mohammad Yaasir Ozeer, Jhoti Somanah Bhugowandeen
{"title":"毛里求斯2型糖尿病管理需要固定剂量组合(FDC)","authors":"Mohammad Yaasir Ozeer, Jhoti Somanah Bhugowandeen","doi":"10.31038/edmj.2019331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The State health services of Mauritius are provided free to all 1.27 million inhabitants of the island. Despite so, successive surveys by the Ministry of Health and Quality of Life have shown that diabetes remains a major public health threat to Mauritians. With 24% of the adult population affected by (type 2 diabetes) T2D, our island is ranked amongst those countries with highest diabetes-related mortality, which emphasizes the need for educating the population proper self-management of the disease. It is also evident that poor treatment adherence looms large. Patients with T2D under conventional treatment often require multiple medications to achieve glycaemic control. This induces a significant pill burden when coupled with co-morbid conditions associated to diabetes and deters adherence to treatment. Public health institutions in Mauritius support the usage of loose pills for diabetes treatment as opposed to private institutions who promote the adoption of Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) therapy as a means to improve treatment efficacy. A scaled-study was conducted to explore the efficiency and patients’ perspectives on FDC in the management of T2D. 65 patients from the Diabetes and Vascular Health Centre were grouped according to their treatment regimen: FDC from start; switched to FDC from loose pills; reverted to loose pills after trying FDC and loose pills treatment. Patients were interviewed and their clinical parameters recorded. Results showed that 67.7 % of patients were taking more than 7 pills a day to achieve glycaemic control, with only 30.8 % being made aware of possible FDC options by their healthcare practitioner. 96.3% patients who were on loose pills expressed their willingness to shift to FDC if made available in public institutions. Overall glycaemic control was better managed among the FDC group. Our findings concluded that the loose pill regime was indeed problematic for diabetics to achieve optimal glycaemic control. FDC could be pivotal in improving their health outcomes, barriers such as communication of treatment availabilities, financial constraints, shared decision-making and self-management training also need to be addressed.","PeriodicalId":72911,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Need for Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Mauritius\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Yaasir Ozeer, Jhoti Somanah Bhugowandeen\",\"doi\":\"10.31038/edmj.2019331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The State health services of Mauritius are provided free to all 1.27 million inhabitants of the island. Despite so, successive surveys by the Ministry of Health and Quality of Life have shown that diabetes remains a major public health threat to Mauritians. With 24% of the adult population affected by (type 2 diabetes) T2D, our island is ranked amongst those countries with highest diabetes-related mortality, which emphasizes the need for educating the population proper self-management of the disease. It is also evident that poor treatment adherence looms large. Patients with T2D under conventional treatment often require multiple medications to achieve glycaemic control. This induces a significant pill burden when coupled with co-morbid conditions associated to diabetes and deters adherence to treatment. Public health institutions in Mauritius support the usage of loose pills for diabetes treatment as opposed to private institutions who promote the adoption of Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) therapy as a means to improve treatment efficacy. A scaled-study was conducted to explore the efficiency and patients’ perspectives on FDC in the management of T2D. 65 patients from the Diabetes and Vascular Health Centre were grouped according to their treatment regimen: FDC from start; switched to FDC from loose pills; reverted to loose pills after trying FDC and loose pills treatment. Patients were interviewed and their clinical parameters recorded. Results showed that 67.7 % of patients were taking more than 7 pills a day to achieve glycaemic control, with only 30.8 % being made aware of possible FDC options by their healthcare practitioner. 96.3% patients who were on loose pills expressed their willingness to shift to FDC if made available in public institutions. Overall glycaemic control was better managed among the FDC group. Our findings concluded that the loose pill regime was indeed problematic for diabetics to achieve optimal glycaemic control. FDC could be pivotal in improving their health outcomes, barriers such as communication of treatment availabilities, financial constraints, shared decision-making and self-management training also need to be addressed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31038/edmj.2019331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/edmj.2019331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毛里求斯向全岛127万居民免费提供国家保健服务。尽管如此,卫生和生活质量部的连续调查表明,糖尿病仍然是毛里求斯人面临的主要公共健康威胁。我国成年人口中有24%患有(2型糖尿病)T2D,是与糖尿病有关的死亡率最高的国家之一,这就强调有必要教育人民对这种疾病进行适当的自我管理。治疗依从性差的问题也很明显。常规治疗的T2D患者往往需要多种药物才能达到血糖控制。当与糖尿病相关的合并症相结合时,这就会导致严重的药物负担,并阻碍治疗的坚持。毛里求斯的公共卫生机构支持使用散装药片治疗糖尿病,而私营机构则提倡采用固定剂量联合疗法作为提高治疗效果的手段。我们进行了一项规模研究,以探讨FDC在T2D治疗中的效率和患者的观点。来自糖尿病和血管健康中心的65名患者根据他们的治疗方案进行分组:从开始的FDC;从散装药丸改为FDC;在尝试FDC和散丸治疗后又恢复服用散丸。对患者进行访谈并记录其临床参数。结果显示,67.7%的患者每天服用7片以上的药物来控制血糖,只有30.8%的患者被他们的保健医生告知可能的FDC选择。96.3%服用散装药片的患者表示,如果公共机构提供FDC,他们愿意转向FDC。FDC组总体血糖控制较好。我们的研究结果表明,对于糖尿病患者来说,松散的药丸疗法确实存在问题,无法达到最佳的血糖控制。FDC可在改善其健康结果方面发挥关键作用,但也需要解决诸如通报治疗情况、财政限制、共同决策和自我管理培训等障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Need for Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Mauritius
The State health services of Mauritius are provided free to all 1.27 million inhabitants of the island. Despite so, successive surveys by the Ministry of Health and Quality of Life have shown that diabetes remains a major public health threat to Mauritians. With 24% of the adult population affected by (type 2 diabetes) T2D, our island is ranked amongst those countries with highest diabetes-related mortality, which emphasizes the need for educating the population proper self-management of the disease. It is also evident that poor treatment adherence looms large. Patients with T2D under conventional treatment often require multiple medications to achieve glycaemic control. This induces a significant pill burden when coupled with co-morbid conditions associated to diabetes and deters adherence to treatment. Public health institutions in Mauritius support the usage of loose pills for diabetes treatment as opposed to private institutions who promote the adoption of Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) therapy as a means to improve treatment efficacy. A scaled-study was conducted to explore the efficiency and patients’ perspectives on FDC in the management of T2D. 65 patients from the Diabetes and Vascular Health Centre were grouped according to their treatment regimen: FDC from start; switched to FDC from loose pills; reverted to loose pills after trying FDC and loose pills treatment. Patients were interviewed and their clinical parameters recorded. Results showed that 67.7 % of patients were taking more than 7 pills a day to achieve glycaemic control, with only 30.8 % being made aware of possible FDC options by their healthcare practitioner. 96.3% patients who were on loose pills expressed their willingness to shift to FDC if made available in public institutions. Overall glycaemic control was better managed among the FDC group. Our findings concluded that the loose pill regime was indeed problematic for diabetics to achieve optimal glycaemic control. FDC could be pivotal in improving their health outcomes, barriers such as communication of treatment availabilities, financial constraints, shared decision-making and self-management training also need to be addressed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pattern of Presentation of Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus Among Sudanese Patients The Role of Endocrine Mediators in the Neurodegeneration and Synaptic Dysfunction of Depressive Illness In their Own Language: Communicating Health to Boost Compliance for Weight Loss and Diabetes Modifiable Risk Factors and the Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome among Women with and without a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: An Ambidirectional Cohort Study from Pakistan Neuroprotective Effects of a Serotonin Receptor Peptide Following Sham vs. Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Zucker Rat.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1