用三轴试验确定土工格栅加筋砂抗剪强度

IF 0.7 Q4 MECHANICS Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica Pub Date : 2020-09-25 DOI:10.2478/sgem-2020-0005
Š. Skuodis, N. Dirgėlienė, Jurgis Medzvieckas
{"title":"用三轴试验确定土工格栅加筋砂抗剪强度","authors":"Š. Skuodis, N. Dirgėlienė, Jurgis Medzvieckas","doi":"10.2478/sgem-2020-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Geogrids are widely used in civil engineering projects to reinforce road and railway structures. This paper presents research on the shearing strength of soil samples that have been reinforced with geogrids. The relationship between soil and geogrids is explored and evaluated by modeling the mechanical behavior of heterogeneous materials. For the purposes of this research, data obtained from tests of unreinforced sand samples with triaxial cells were compared with the data obtained from tests of reinforced sand samples. It was found that the shearing strength for reinforced samples was higher (from 9% to 49%) compared to unreinforced samples. Some damage to the geogrid was detected during the experiment, and for this reason, the same tests were numerically simulated for both unreinforced samples and samples reinforced with geogrids. Numerical simulations revealed the main reasons for damage to the geogrids during triaxial testing.","PeriodicalId":44626,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica","volume":"42 1","pages":"341 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Triaxial Tests to Determine the Shearing Strength of Geogrid-Reinforced Sand\",\"authors\":\"Š. Skuodis, N. Dirgėlienė, Jurgis Medzvieckas\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sgem-2020-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Geogrids are widely used in civil engineering projects to reinforce road and railway structures. This paper presents research on the shearing strength of soil samples that have been reinforced with geogrids. The relationship between soil and geogrids is explored and evaluated by modeling the mechanical behavior of heterogeneous materials. For the purposes of this research, data obtained from tests of unreinforced sand samples with triaxial cells were compared with the data obtained from tests of reinforced sand samples. It was found that the shearing strength for reinforced samples was higher (from 9% to 49%) compared to unreinforced samples. Some damage to the geogrid was detected during the experiment, and for this reason, the same tests were numerically simulated for both unreinforced samples and samples reinforced with geogrids. Numerical simulations revealed the main reasons for damage to the geogrids during triaxial testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"341 - 354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2020-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2020-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

土工格栅在土木工程中广泛应用于公路、铁路等结构的加固。本文对土工格栅加固土样的抗剪强度进行了研究。通过模拟非均质材料的力学行为,探讨了土与土工格栅之间的关系。为了本研究的目的,我们将未加筋三轴胞室砂样的试验数据与加筋砂样的试验数据进行了比较。结果表明,加筋试样的抗剪强度比未加筋试样高9% ~ 49%。在试验过程中发现了土工格栅的一些损伤,因此,对未加筋和加筋的土工格栅进行了相同的数值模拟试验。数值模拟揭示了三轴试验中土工格栅损坏的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Triaxial Tests to Determine the Shearing Strength of Geogrid-Reinforced Sand
Abstract Geogrids are widely used in civil engineering projects to reinforce road and railway structures. This paper presents research on the shearing strength of soil samples that have been reinforced with geogrids. The relationship between soil and geogrids is explored and evaluated by modeling the mechanical behavior of heterogeneous materials. For the purposes of this research, data obtained from tests of unreinforced sand samples with triaxial cells were compared with the data obtained from tests of reinforced sand samples. It was found that the shearing strength for reinforced samples was higher (from 9% to 49%) compared to unreinforced samples. Some damage to the geogrid was detected during the experiment, and for this reason, the same tests were numerically simulated for both unreinforced samples and samples reinforced with geogrids. Numerical simulations revealed the main reasons for damage to the geogrids during triaxial testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international journal ‘Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica’ covers new developments in the broad areas of geomechanics as well as structural mechanics. The journal welcomes contributions dealing with original theoretical, numerical as well as experimental work. The following topics are of special interest: Constitutive relations for geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, etc.) Modeling of mechanical behaviour of heterogeneous materials at different scales Analysis of coupled thermo-hydro-chemo-mechanical problems Modeling of instabilities and localized deformation Experimental investigations of material properties at different scales Numerical algorithms: formulation and performance Application of numerical techniques to analysis of problems involving foundations, underground structures, slopes and embankment Risk and reliability analysis Analysis of concrete and masonry structures Modeling of case histories
期刊最新文献
Correlation between Cone Penetration Test parameters, soil type, and soil liquidity index using long short-term memory neural network Second-order effects in horizontally loaded reinforced concrete columns The Use of CPTU and DMT Methods to Determine Soil Deformation Moduli—Perspectives and Limitations Quality requirements for static liquefaction test of soil in triaxial apparatus Application of Clay–rubber Mixtures for the Transportation Geotechnics—the Numerical Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1