治理技术未来:经合组织对自动化的预期和管理主义的倍增

IF 1.7 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Society Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/13600826.2021.2021148
M. Campbell-Verduyn, M. Hütten
{"title":"治理技术未来:经合组织对自动化的预期和管理主义的倍增","authors":"M. Campbell-Verduyn, M. Hütten","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.2021148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT How do international organisations (IOs) govern the present based on claims about the coming impacts of technological change? Drawing on primary documents and participant observation, this article traces how the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) anticipates automation emanating from the growing integration of blockchain technologies in global governance. We find that promises of radical, rapid, and reckless automation advanced by promoters of Bitcoin and other ‘defiant’ applications of the technology are steered by this IO towards more incremental and carefully managed forms of automation. The OECD relies on two managerialist practices to anticipate “reckless automation” through the promotion of what we identify as “responsible disruption”. In combination, OECD practices of scenario building and shared orientation framework construction deepen and extend managerial forms of global governance today whose technocratic and expert-led nature limits democratic possibilities and perpetuates global inequalities.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"36 1","pages":"240 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governing Techno-Futures: OECD Anticipation of Automation and the Multiplication of Managerialism\",\"authors\":\"M. Campbell-Verduyn, M. Hütten\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13600826.2021.2021148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT How do international organisations (IOs) govern the present based on claims about the coming impacts of technological change? Drawing on primary documents and participant observation, this article traces how the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) anticipates automation emanating from the growing integration of blockchain technologies in global governance. We find that promises of radical, rapid, and reckless automation advanced by promoters of Bitcoin and other ‘defiant’ applications of the technology are steered by this IO towards more incremental and carefully managed forms of automation. The OECD relies on two managerialist practices to anticipate “reckless automation” through the promotion of what we identify as “responsible disruption”. In combination, OECD practices of scenario building and shared orientation framework construction deepen and extend managerial forms of global governance today whose technocratic and expert-led nature limits democratic possibilities and perpetuates global inequalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Society\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"240 - 260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.2021148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.2021148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:国际组织如何根据技术变革即将产生的影响来治理当前?根据主要文件和参与者的观察,本文追溯了经济合作与发展组织(OECD)如何预测区块链技术在全球治理中日益融合所带来的自动化。我们发现,比特币和该技术的其他“挑衅”应用的推动者所提出的激进、快速和鲁莽的自动化承诺,正是由这种IO引导向更渐进、更谨慎管理的自动化形式。经合组织依靠两种管理主义做法,通过促进我们所认定的“负责任的破坏”来预测“鲁莽的自动化”。经合组织情景构建和共同导向框架构建的做法相结合,深化和扩展了当今全球治理的管理形式,其技术官僚和专家主导的性质限制了民主的可能性,并使全球不平等现象长期存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Governing Techno-Futures: OECD Anticipation of Automation and the Multiplication of Managerialism
ABSTRACT How do international organisations (IOs) govern the present based on claims about the coming impacts of technological change? Drawing on primary documents and participant observation, this article traces how the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) anticipates automation emanating from the growing integration of blockchain technologies in global governance. We find that promises of radical, rapid, and reckless automation advanced by promoters of Bitcoin and other ‘defiant’ applications of the technology are steered by this IO towards more incremental and carefully managed forms of automation. The OECD relies on two managerialist practices to anticipate “reckless automation” through the promotion of what we identify as “responsible disruption”. In combination, OECD practices of scenario building and shared orientation framework construction deepen and extend managerial forms of global governance today whose technocratic and expert-led nature limits democratic possibilities and perpetuates global inequalities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Society
Global Society INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Global Society covers the new agenda in global and international relations and encourages innovative approaches to the study of global and international issues from a range of disciplines. It promotes the analysis of transactions at multiple levels, and in particular, the way in which these transactions blur the distinction between the sub-national, national, transnational, international and global levels. An ever integrating global society raises a number of issues for global and international relations which do not fit comfortably within established "Paradigms" Among these are the international and global consequences of nationalism and struggles for identity, migration, racism, religious fundamentalism, terrorism and criminal activities.
期刊最新文献
Passivity as Resistance: Counter-Conduct in Japan and Cambodia Counter-Conducts: A Foucauldian Analytics of Popup Civic Actions in Mexico Authoritarianism, Governmentality and the COVID-19 Response Re-thinking Global Governance as Fuzzy: Multi-Scalar Boundaries of Responsibility in the Arctic Multilateralism at War: Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine, the G20 and World Order
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1