测试元启发式优化算法的性能度量和工具

Q4 Chemical Engineering Applied and Computational Mechanics Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.22055/JACM.2021.37664.3060
F. Schott, D. Chamoret, T. Baron, Sébastien Salmon, Y. Meyer
{"title":"测试元启发式优化算法的性能度量和工具","authors":"F. Schott, D. Chamoret, T. Baron, Sébastien Salmon, Y. Meyer","doi":"10.22055/JACM.2021.37664.3060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade, many new algorithms have been proposed to solve optimization problems. Most of them are meta-heuristic algorithms. The issue of accurate performance measure of algorithms is still under discussion in the scientific community. Therefore, a new scoring strategy via a new benchmark is proposed. The idea of this new tool is to determine a score, a measure of efficiency taking into account both the end value of the optimization and the convergence speed. This measure is based on an aggregate of statistical results of different optimization problems. These problems are judiciously chosen to cover as broad a spectrum of resolution configurations as possible. They are defined by combinations of several parameters: dimensions, objective functions and evaluation limit on dimension ratios. Aggregation methods are chosen and set in order to make the problem weight relevant according to the computed score. This scoring strategy is compared to the CEC one thanks to the results of different algorithms: PSO, CMAES, Genetic Algorithm, Cuttlefish and simulated annealing.","PeriodicalId":37801,"journal":{"name":"Applied and Computational Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance measure and tool for benchmarking metaheuristic optimization algorithms\",\"authors\":\"F. Schott, D. Chamoret, T. Baron, Sébastien Salmon, Y. Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.22055/JACM.2021.37664.3060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last decade, many new algorithms have been proposed to solve optimization problems. Most of them are meta-heuristic algorithms. The issue of accurate performance measure of algorithms is still under discussion in the scientific community. Therefore, a new scoring strategy via a new benchmark is proposed. The idea of this new tool is to determine a score, a measure of efficiency taking into account both the end value of the optimization and the convergence speed. This measure is based on an aggregate of statistical results of different optimization problems. These problems are judiciously chosen to cover as broad a spectrum of resolution configurations as possible. They are defined by combinations of several parameters: dimensions, objective functions and evaluation limit on dimension ratios. Aggregation methods are chosen and set in order to make the problem weight relevant according to the computed score. This scoring strategy is compared to the CEC one thanks to the results of different algorithms: PSO, CMAES, Genetic Algorithm, Cuttlefish and simulated annealing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied and Computational Mechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied and Computational Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22055/JACM.2021.37664.3060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemical Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied and Computational Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22055/JACM.2021.37664.3060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的十年里,人们提出了许多新的算法来解决优化问题。它们大多是元启发式算法。算法的准确性能度量问题仍在科学界讨论中。因此,提出了一种新的基于新基准的评分策略。这个新工具的想法是确定一个分数,这是一种考虑优化最终值和收敛速度的效率衡量标准。该度量基于不同优化问题的统计结果的集合。明智地选择这些问题以覆盖尽可能广泛的分辨率配置。它们是由几个参数的组合定义的:维度、目标函数和维度比率的评估极限。选择和设置聚合方法,以便根据计算的分数使问题权重相关。由于不同算法的结果,该评分策略与CEC评分策略进行了比较:PSO、CMAES、遗传算法、Cuttlefish和模拟退火。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance measure and tool for benchmarking metaheuristic optimization algorithms
In the last decade, many new algorithms have been proposed to solve optimization problems. Most of them are meta-heuristic algorithms. The issue of accurate performance measure of algorithms is still under discussion in the scientific community. Therefore, a new scoring strategy via a new benchmark is proposed. The idea of this new tool is to determine a score, a measure of efficiency taking into account both the end value of the optimization and the convergence speed. This measure is based on an aggregate of statistical results of different optimization problems. These problems are judiciously chosen to cover as broad a spectrum of resolution configurations as possible. They are defined by combinations of several parameters: dimensions, objective functions and evaluation limit on dimension ratios. Aggregation methods are chosen and set in order to make the problem weight relevant according to the computed score. This scoring strategy is compared to the CEC one thanks to the results of different algorithms: PSO, CMAES, Genetic Algorithm, Cuttlefish and simulated annealing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied and Computational Mechanics
Applied and Computational Mechanics Engineering-Computational Mechanics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The ACM journal covers a broad spectrum of topics in all fields of applied and computational mechanics with special emphasis on mathematical modelling and numerical simulations with experimental support, if relevant. Our audience is the international scientific community, academics as well as engineers interested in such disciplines. Original research papers falling into the following areas are considered for possible publication: solid mechanics, mechanics of materials, thermodynamics, biomechanics and mechanobiology, fluid-structure interaction, dynamics of multibody systems, mechatronics, vibrations and waves, reliability and durability of structures, structural damage and fracture mechanics, heterogenous media and multiscale problems, structural mechanics, experimental methods in mechanics. This list is neither exhaustive nor fixed.
期刊最新文献
Compressor cascade correlations modelling at design points using artificial neural networks Mesh convergence error estimations for compressible inviscid fluid flow over airfoil cascades using multiblock structured mesh Numerical approximation of convective Brinkman-Forchheimer flow with variable permeability Numerical simulations of aeroelastic instabilities in a turbine-blade cascade by a modified Van der Pol model at running excitation Higher order computational model considering the effects of transverse normal strain and 2-parameter elastic foundation for the bending of laminated panels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1