新型抗癫痫药物对癫痫患者同型半胱氨酸的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-04-21 DOI:10.1155/2023/5878004
Danyi Zheng, Y. Bao, Jiayi Gu, Tian Lv, Yue Yang
{"title":"新型抗癫痫药物对癫痫患者同型半胱氨酸的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Danyi Zheng, Y. Bao, Jiayi Gu, Tian Lv, Yue Yang","doi":"10.1155/2023/5878004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the association between elevated plasma homocysteine (Hcy) levels and new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the effects of new AEDs on Hcy. Methods. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to June 2022 for articles that focused on the effects of new AEDs on Hcy. A meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software. The results were presented as the mean difference (MD) and corresponding to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing epileptic patients with new AEDs to the control subjects. Results. A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Hcy was markedly increased in the new AEDs group compared with the control group (MD = 2.220, 95% CI: 0.596–3.844, \n \n P\n =\n 0.007\n \n ), with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 99.5%). In the drugs subgroup, the oxcarbazepine (OXC) (MD = 2.30, 95% CI: −1.11–5.72, \n \n P\n =\n 0.187\n \n ) and lamotrigine (LTG) (MD = 1.14, 95% CI: −0.209–2.482, \n \n P\n <\n 0.001\n \n ) groups had no significant differences when compared with the control group. The levetiracetam (LEV) (MD = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.03–2.18, \n \n P\n <\n 0.001\n \n ) and topiramate (TPM) (MD = 6.922, 95% CI: 0.788–13.055, \n \n P\n =\n 0.027\n \n ) groups were significantly higher than the control group. Conclusions. The new AEDs, especially TPM and LEV, may increase the plasma of Hcy. The role of Hcy in patients with epilepsy who are given TPM and LEV should not be ignored in clinical situations. Patients with epilepsy who also have a high-risk vascular profile are recommended to use OXC and LTG.","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of New Antiepileptic Drugs on Homocysteine in Epileptic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Danyi Zheng, Y. Bao, Jiayi Gu, Tian Lv, Yue Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/5878004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the association between elevated plasma homocysteine (Hcy) levels and new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the effects of new AEDs on Hcy. Methods. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to June 2022 for articles that focused on the effects of new AEDs on Hcy. A meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software. The results were presented as the mean difference (MD) and corresponding to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing epileptic patients with new AEDs to the control subjects. Results. A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Hcy was markedly increased in the new AEDs group compared with the control group (MD = 2.220, 95% CI: 0.596–3.844, \\n \\n P\\n =\\n 0.007\\n \\n ), with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 99.5%). In the drugs subgroup, the oxcarbazepine (OXC) (MD = 2.30, 95% CI: −1.11–5.72, \\n \\n P\\n =\\n 0.187\\n \\n ) and lamotrigine (LTG) (MD = 1.14, 95% CI: −0.209–2.482, \\n \\n P\\n <\\n 0.001\\n \\n ) groups had no significant differences when compared with the control group. The levetiracetam (LEV) (MD = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.03–2.18, \\n \\n P\\n <\\n 0.001\\n \\n ) and topiramate (TPM) (MD = 6.922, 95% CI: 0.788–13.055, \\n \\n P\\n =\\n 0.027\\n \\n ) groups were significantly higher than the control group. Conclusions. The new AEDs, especially TPM and LEV, may increase the plasma of Hcy. The role of Hcy in patients with epilepsy who are given TPM and LEV should not be ignored in clinical situations. Patients with epilepsy who also have a high-risk vascular profile are recommended to use OXC and LTG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5878004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5878004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。先前的研究报道了血浆同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)水平升高与新型抗癫痫药物(aed)之间的不一致的发现。在本荟萃分析中,我们旨在评估新型aed对Hcy的影响。方法。检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库,从建立到2022年6月,检索了有关新型aed对Hcy影响的文章。采用Stata 16.0软件进行meta分析。结果以平均差值(MD)和对应的95%置信区间(ci)表示,将新发aed的癫痫患者与对照组进行比较。结果。荟萃分析共纳入了11项研究。与对照组相比,新发aed组Hcy显著升高(MD = 2.220, 95% CI: 0.596 ~ 3.844, P = 0.007),且异质性较高(I2 = 99.5%)。在药物亚组中,奥卡西平(OXC)组(MD = 2.30, 95% CI: - 1.11 ~ 5.72, P = 0.187)和拉莫三嗪(LTG)组(MD = 1.14, 95% CI: - 0.209 ~ 2.482, P < 0.001)与对照组比较差异无统计学意义。左乙拉西坦(LEV)组(MD = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.03 ~ 2.18, P < 0.001)和托吡酯(TPM)组(MD = 6.922, 95% CI: 0.788 ~ 13.055, P = 0.027)显著高于对照组。结论。新型抗癫痫药,尤其是TPM和LEV可使Hcy血浆浓度升高。Hcy在给予TPM和LEV的癫痫患者中的作用不容忽视。同时具有高危血管特征的癫痫患者推荐使用OXC和LTG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of New Antiepileptic Drugs on Homocysteine in Epileptic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background. Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the association between elevated plasma homocysteine (Hcy) levels and new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the effects of new AEDs on Hcy. Methods. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to June 2022 for articles that focused on the effects of new AEDs on Hcy. A meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software. The results were presented as the mean difference (MD) and corresponding to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing epileptic patients with new AEDs to the control subjects. Results. A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Hcy was markedly increased in the new AEDs group compared with the control group (MD = 2.220, 95% CI: 0.596–3.844, P = 0.007 ), with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 99.5%). In the drugs subgroup, the oxcarbazepine (OXC) (MD = 2.30, 95% CI: −1.11–5.72, P = 0.187 ) and lamotrigine (LTG) (MD = 1.14, 95% CI: −0.209–2.482, P < 0.001 ) groups had no significant differences when compared with the control group. The levetiracetam (LEV) (MD = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.03–2.18, P < 0.001 ) and topiramate (TPM) (MD = 6.922, 95% CI: 0.788–13.055, P = 0.027 ) groups were significantly higher than the control group. Conclusions. The new AEDs, especially TPM and LEV, may increase the plasma of Hcy. The role of Hcy in patients with epilepsy who are given TPM and LEV should not be ignored in clinical situations. Patients with epilepsy who also have a high-risk vascular profile are recommended to use OXC and LTG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including: Rational therapeutics Evidence-based practice Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs Drug interactions Clinical impact of drug formulations Pharmacogenetics Personalised, stratified and translational medicine Clinical pharmacokinetics.
期刊最新文献
Medication Errors: An Update From the Central Region of Ghana Synergistic Inhibitory Effect of Gliquidone Against Cisplatin-Resistant Human Lung Adenocarcinoma TH-302: A Highly Selective Hypoxia-Activated Prodrug for Treating PARP Inhibitor–Resistant Cancers Potential Role of APC Mutations in the Prognosis and Targeted Therapy of Gastric Adenocarcinoma The Evaluation for Expandable Applications of Tislelizumab in First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1