休谟的《人性论》中关于空间的思想

Andrea Cachel
{"title":"休谟的《人性论》中关于空间的思想","authors":"Andrea Cachel","doi":"10.5216/PHI.V22I1.40949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, one aims to analyze the Hume´s discussion about the idea of space, presenting the debate about the rejection of the theory of infinite divisibility of extension and its defense of the perceptive atomism. Therefore, one starts from the context of analysis which Hume is inserted, that is, the debate between Locke and Berkeley regarding the abstraction of the extension. In this sense, the text attempts to point how Hume´s debate concerning space results in sustaining the existence of mathematical points and to show how the thesis regarding the relational nature of space is Hume´s form to seek the link between his perceptive atomism and abstractionism.","PeriodicalId":30368,"journal":{"name":"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia","volume":"22 1","pages":"11-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A IDEIA DE ESPAÇO NO TRATADO DA NATUREZA HUMANA, DE HUME\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Cachel\",\"doi\":\"10.5216/PHI.V22I1.40949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, one aims to analyze the Hume´s discussion about the idea of space, presenting the debate about the rejection of the theory of infinite divisibility of extension and its defense of the perceptive atomism. Therefore, one starts from the context of analysis which Hume is inserted, that is, the debate between Locke and Berkeley regarding the abstraction of the extension. In this sense, the text attempts to point how Hume´s debate concerning space results in sustaining the existence of mathematical points and to show how the thesis regarding the relational nature of space is Hume´s form to seek the link between his perceptive atomism and abstractionism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"11-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5216/PHI.V22I1.40949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/PHI.V22I1.40949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析休谟关于空间概念的讨论,提出对可拓无限可分性理论的否定及其对感知原子论的辩护。因此,我们要从休谟插入的分析语境出发,也就是洛克和伯克利之间关于外延抽象的争论。从这个意义上说,本文试图指出休谟关于空间的辩论如何导致数学点的存在,并表明关于空间关系本质的论文是休谟寻求其感知原子主义和抽象主义之间联系的形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A IDEIA DE ESPAÇO NO TRATADO DA NATUREZA HUMANA, DE HUME
In this article, one aims to analyze the Hume´s discussion about the idea of space, presenting the debate about the rejection of the theory of infinite divisibility of extension and its defense of the perceptive atomism. Therefore, one starts from the context of analysis which Hume is inserted, that is, the debate between Locke and Berkeley regarding the abstraction of the extension. In this sense, the text attempts to point how Hume´s debate concerning space results in sustaining the existence of mathematical points and to show how the thesis regarding the relational nature of space is Hume´s form to seek the link between his perceptive atomism and abstractionism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tropeços da igualdade no caminho da natureza à civilidade Quatro formas de silenciamento fundamento moral à forma da normatividade Descartes: a dúvida e suas dívidas A relevância da distinção kantiana entre virtude e boa vontade para o debate contemporâneo sobre a ética das virtudes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1