优生边境管制:1945 - 1948年遣返妇女的有组织堕胎

IF 0.6 Q2 AREA STUDIES Japan Forum Pub Date : 2020-11-13 DOI:10.1080/09555803.2020.1831575
Y. Matsubara
{"title":"优生边境管制:1945 - 1948年遣返妇女的有组织堕胎","authors":"Y. Matsubara","doi":"10.1080/09555803.2020.1831575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this article is to provide a fuller picture of the organized abortions on Japanese female repatriates that took place within the repatriate medical relief under occupation of the GHQ. It also analyzes how the government carried out illegal abortions prior to the de facto legalization of abortion by the Eugenic Protection Law of 1948. This article suggests that the government justified abortions for societal reasons, such as rape, or for eugenic reasons, which were illegal at the time, by broadening the interpretation of caring for the mother’s health and treating societal and eugenic reasons as medical reasons. In so doing, the paper examines the issues of historical continuity and discontinuity in Japan’s modern history.","PeriodicalId":44495,"journal":{"name":"Japan Forum","volume":"33 1","pages":"318 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09555803.2020.1831575","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The eugenic border control: organized abortions on repatriated women, 1945–48\",\"authors\":\"Y. Matsubara\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09555803.2020.1831575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this article is to provide a fuller picture of the organized abortions on Japanese female repatriates that took place within the repatriate medical relief under occupation of the GHQ. It also analyzes how the government carried out illegal abortions prior to the de facto legalization of abortion by the Eugenic Protection Law of 1948. This article suggests that the government justified abortions for societal reasons, such as rape, or for eugenic reasons, which were illegal at the time, by broadening the interpretation of caring for the mother’s health and treating societal and eugenic reasons as medical reasons. In so doing, the paper examines the issues of historical continuity and discontinuity in Japan’s modern history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japan Forum\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"318 - 337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09555803.2020.1831575\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japan Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2020.1831575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2020.1831575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文的目的是更全面地了解在GHQ占领下的遣返医疗救济范围内对日本女性遣返者进行的有组织堕胎。它还分析了在1948年《优生保护法》将堕胎事实上合法化之前,政府是如何进行非法堕胎的。这篇文章建议,政府通过扩大对照顾母亲健康的解释,并将社会和优生学原因视为医学原因,为当时非法的强奸或优生学原因等社会原因的堕胎辩护。在此基础上,本文探讨了日本近代史上的历史连续性和历史不连续性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The eugenic border control: organized abortions on repatriated women, 1945–48
Abstract The aim of this article is to provide a fuller picture of the organized abortions on Japanese female repatriates that took place within the repatriate medical relief under occupation of the GHQ. It also analyzes how the government carried out illegal abortions prior to the de facto legalization of abortion by the Eugenic Protection Law of 1948. This article suggests that the government justified abortions for societal reasons, such as rape, or for eugenic reasons, which were illegal at the time, by broadening the interpretation of caring for the mother’s health and treating societal and eugenic reasons as medical reasons. In so doing, the paper examines the issues of historical continuity and discontinuity in Japan’s modern history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japan Forum
Japan Forum AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Hey! Say Ishin: Ōmae Ken’ichi’s and Hashimoto Tōru’s policy entrepreneurship and the neoliberal reorientation of contemporary Ishin politics Shakaijin, shadow education, & the entrepreneurial self: fabricating personhood in neoliberal Japan Eight Dogs, or Hakkenden, Part Two—His Master’s Blade The Work of Gender: Service, Performance and Fantasy in Contemporary Japan Tokyo Jazz Joints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1