膜基深度处理工艺回用城市污水的技术经济分析

IF 2.3 Q2 Environmental Science Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination Pub Date : 2021-10-12 DOI:10.2166/wrd.2021.016
P. Kehrein, M. Jafari, Marc Slagt, E. Cornelissen, P. Osseweijer, John Posada, M. V. van Loosdrecht
{"title":"膜基深度处理工艺回用城市污水的技术经济分析","authors":"P. Kehrein, M. Jafari, Marc Slagt, E. Cornelissen, P. Osseweijer, John Posada, M. V. van Loosdrecht","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2021.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objective of this paper is to compare, under Dutch market conditions, the energy consumption and net costs of membrane-based advanced treatment processes for three water reuse types (i.e. potable, industrial, agricultural reuse). The water source is municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent. Results indicate that the application of reverse osmosis is needed to reclaim high quality water for industrial and potable reuse but not for irrigation water which offers significant energy savings but may not lead automatically to lower net costs. While a reclamation process for industrial reuse is economically most promising, irrigation water reclamation processes are not cost effective due to low water prices. Moreover, process operational expenditures may exceed capital expenditures which is important for tender procedures. A significant cost factor is waste management that may exceed energy costs. Water recovery rates could be significantly enhanced through the integration of a softener/biostabilizer unit prior to reverse osmosis. Moreover, the energy consumption of wastewater reclamation processes could be supplied on-site with solar energy. The possibility of designing a ‘fit for multi-purpose’ reclamation process is discussed briefly. This comparative analysis allows for better informed decision making about which reuse type is preferably targeted in a municipal wastewater reuse project from a process design perspective.","PeriodicalId":17556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A techno-economic analysis of membrane-based advanced treatment processes for the reuse of municipal wastewater\",\"authors\":\"P. Kehrein, M. Jafari, Marc Slagt, E. Cornelissen, P. Osseweijer, John Posada, M. V. van Loosdrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wrd.2021.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The objective of this paper is to compare, under Dutch market conditions, the energy consumption and net costs of membrane-based advanced treatment processes for three water reuse types (i.e. potable, industrial, agricultural reuse). The water source is municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent. Results indicate that the application of reverse osmosis is needed to reclaim high quality water for industrial and potable reuse but not for irrigation water which offers significant energy savings but may not lead automatically to lower net costs. While a reclamation process for industrial reuse is economically most promising, irrigation water reclamation processes are not cost effective due to low water prices. Moreover, process operational expenditures may exceed capital expenditures which is important for tender procedures. A significant cost factor is waste management that may exceed energy costs. Water recovery rates could be significantly enhanced through the integration of a softener/biostabilizer unit prior to reverse osmosis. Moreover, the energy consumption of wastewater reclamation processes could be supplied on-site with solar energy. The possibility of designing a ‘fit for multi-purpose’ reclamation process is discussed briefly. This comparative analysis allows for better informed decision making about which reuse type is preferably targeted in a municipal wastewater reuse project from a process design perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2021.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2021.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

本文的目的是在荷兰市场条件下,比较三种水再利用类型(即饮用水、工业水和农业水再利用)的基于膜的先进处理工艺的能耗和净成本。水源为城市污水处理厂出水。结果表明,需要应用反渗透来回收高质量的水用于工业和饮用水的再利用,但不用于灌溉水,这提供了显著的能源节约,但可能不会自动降低净成本。虽然工业再利用的回收工艺在经济上最有前景,但由于水价低,灌溉水回收工艺成本效益不高。此外,流程运营支出可能超过资本支出,这对招标程序很重要。一个重要的成本因素是可能超过能源成本的废物管理。在反渗透之前,通过整合软化剂/生物稳定剂单元,可以显著提高水的回收率。此外,废水回收过程的能耗可以通过太阳能现场供应。简要讨论了设计一种“适合多用途”回收工艺的可能性。从工艺设计的角度来看,这种比较分析可以更好地决定在城市废水再利用项目中优选哪种再利用类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A techno-economic analysis of membrane-based advanced treatment processes for the reuse of municipal wastewater
The objective of this paper is to compare, under Dutch market conditions, the energy consumption and net costs of membrane-based advanced treatment processes for three water reuse types (i.e. potable, industrial, agricultural reuse). The water source is municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent. Results indicate that the application of reverse osmosis is needed to reclaim high quality water for industrial and potable reuse but not for irrigation water which offers significant energy savings but may not lead automatically to lower net costs. While a reclamation process for industrial reuse is economically most promising, irrigation water reclamation processes are not cost effective due to low water prices. Moreover, process operational expenditures may exceed capital expenditures which is important for tender procedures. A significant cost factor is waste management that may exceed energy costs. Water recovery rates could be significantly enhanced through the integration of a softener/biostabilizer unit prior to reverse osmosis. Moreover, the energy consumption of wastewater reclamation processes could be supplied on-site with solar energy. The possibility of designing a ‘fit for multi-purpose’ reclamation process is discussed briefly. This comparative analysis allows for better informed decision making about which reuse type is preferably targeted in a municipal wastewater reuse project from a process design perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination publishes refereed review articles, theoretical and experimental research papers, new findings and issues of unplanned and planned reuse. The journal welcomes contributions from developing and developed countries.
期刊最新文献
Innovative strategies for treatment and management of saline water/wastewater Evaluation of UVLED disinfection for biofouling control during distribution of wastewater effluent Bioremoval efficiency and metabolomic profiles of cellular responses of Chlorella pyrenoidosa to phenol and 4-fluorophenol Construction and empirical research of the evaluation index system of environmental protection enterprises’ competitiveness based on the Delphi and AHP methods Deep learning algorithms were used to generate photovoltaic renewable energy in saline water analysis via an oxidation process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1