高产科研团队演化量化指标的比较研究

Bentao Zou , Yuefen Wang
{"title":"高产科研团队演化量化指标的比较研究","authors":"Bentao Zou ,&nbsp;Yuefen Wang","doi":"10.2478/dim-2020-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scientific research teams play an increasingly significant role in scientific activities. To better understand the dynamic evolution process of research teams, we explored measures that quantify the evolution of prolific research teams. We collected our data from the Web of Science in the field of artificial intelligence, and applied the label propagation algorithm to identify research teams in the co-authorship network. The Top 1‰ prolific teams were selected as our research object, whose node stability and two types of edge stabilities were measured. The results show that prolific teams are much more stable during the evolution process, in terms of both member and membership stability. The measure of stability has varying degrees of impact on teams with different sizes, and small-sized teams get considerably different stability results by different measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72769,"journal":{"name":"Data and information management","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925122000213/pdfft?md5=f37cf316a71f0ad36d20545073f1e4b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2543925122000213-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison Study of Measures to Quantify the Evolution of Prolific Research Teams\",\"authors\":\"Bentao Zou ,&nbsp;Yuefen Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/dim-2020-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Scientific research teams play an increasingly significant role in scientific activities. To better understand the dynamic evolution process of research teams, we explored measures that quantify the evolution of prolific research teams. We collected our data from the Web of Science in the field of artificial intelligence, and applied the label propagation algorithm to identify research teams in the co-authorship network. The Top 1‰ prolific teams were selected as our research object, whose node stability and two types of edge stabilities were measured. The results show that prolific teams are much more stable during the evolution process, in terms of both member and membership stability. The measure of stability has varying degrees of impact on teams with different sizes, and small-sized teams get considerably different stability results by different measures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data and information management\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 56-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925122000213/pdfft?md5=f37cf316a71f0ad36d20545073f1e4b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2543925122000213-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data and information management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925122000213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data and information management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925122000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科研团队在科学活动中发挥着越来越重要的作用。为了更好地理解科研团队的动态演化过程,我们探索了量化高产科研团队演化的方法。我们从人工智能领域的Web of Science中收集数据,并应用标签传播算法在合作作者网络中识别研究团队。选取高产率前1‰的团队作为研究对象,对其节点稳定性和两种边缘稳定性进行了测量。结果表明,在进化过程中,多产的团队在成员和成员稳定性方面都更加稳定。稳定性的度量对不同规模的团队有不同程度的影响,小型团队通过不同的度量得到的稳定性结果差异较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison Study of Measures to Quantify the Evolution of Prolific Research Teams

Scientific research teams play an increasingly significant role in scientific activities. To better understand the dynamic evolution process of research teams, we explored measures that quantify the evolution of prolific research teams. We collected our data from the Web of Science in the field of artificial intelligence, and applied the label propagation algorithm to identify research teams in the co-authorship network. The Top 1‰ prolific teams were selected as our research object, whose node stability and two types of edge stabilities were measured. The results show that prolific teams are much more stable during the evolution process, in terms of both member and membership stability. The measure of stability has varying degrees of impact on teams with different sizes, and small-sized teams get considerably different stability results by different measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Data and information management
Data and information management Management Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Erratum regarding missing Declaration of Competing Interest statements in previously published articles (Volume 6, Issues 1–4) Improved detection of transient events in wide area sky survey using convolutional neural networks An evaluation method of academic output that considers productivity differences Adaptive K-means clustering based under-sampling methods to solve the class imbalance problem Does internet use affect public risk perception? — From the perspective of political participation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1