输尿管镜碎石前预先放置输尿管支架的必要性:一项荟萃分析

Yi Zhang, Xiulan Wang, Ji Zhang
{"title":"输尿管镜碎石前预先放置输尿管支架的必要性:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Yi Zhang, Xiulan Wang, Ji Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo systematically evaluate the necessity of presetting double-J stent before flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy. \n \n \nMethods \nComputer retrieved clinical studies on the effect of preoperative presetting double-J-catheter on flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Wan fang, CNKI and VIP databases were reviewed. The retrieval time was from the database construction to November 2018. All of the possible combinations of the following terms were used for the search: flexible ureteroscopic, preoperative, double J stent, and calculus. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality evaluation and data extraction, and completed Meta analysis by using statistical software RevMan5.3. \n \n \nResults \nThirty-two case-control trials and 14 randomized controlled trials were screened, with a total of 17 480 patients, including 6 211 patients in the experimental group and 11 269 patients in the control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the experimental group was superior to the control group in term of the overall postoperative stone clearance rate (OR=1.69, 95%CI 1.37-2.08, P<0.05). In terms of postoperative kidney stone removal rate, the experimental group was superior to the control group (OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.41-1.99, P<0.05). In terms of the removal rate of ureteral calculi after surgery, there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR=1.71, 95%CI 0.91-3.20, P=0.10). The success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation was higher in the experimental group (OR=5.77, 95%CI 3.32-10.31, P<0.05). The rate of passive usage balloon dilation in the control group was higher(OR=0.23, 95%CI 0.15-0.35, P<0.05). For the incidence of intraoperative complications, the experimental group was lower (OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.84, P=0.004). For the incidence of postoperative complications, the experimental group was also lower(OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.45-0.90, P=0.01). The operation time of the control group was longer(MD=-4.95, 95%CI -8.90--1.01, P=0.01). \n \n \nConclusions \nPresetting double-J-catheter can improve the stone removal rate after flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stone, improve the success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation, reduce the utilization rate of ureteral balloon dilator, reduce the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and shorten the operation time. \n \n \nKey words: \nUrinary calculus; Flexible ureteroscopic; Double J stent; Meta-analysis","PeriodicalId":10343,"journal":{"name":"中华泌尿外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The necessity of presetting ureteral stents before ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yi Zhang, Xiulan Wang, Ji Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo systematically evaluate the necessity of presetting double-J stent before flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nComputer retrieved clinical studies on the effect of preoperative presetting double-J-catheter on flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Wan fang, CNKI and VIP databases were reviewed. The retrieval time was from the database construction to November 2018. All of the possible combinations of the following terms were used for the search: flexible ureteroscopic, preoperative, double J stent, and calculus. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality evaluation and data extraction, and completed Meta analysis by using statistical software RevMan5.3. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThirty-two case-control trials and 14 randomized controlled trials were screened, with a total of 17 480 patients, including 6 211 patients in the experimental group and 11 269 patients in the control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the experimental group was superior to the control group in term of the overall postoperative stone clearance rate (OR=1.69, 95%CI 1.37-2.08, P<0.05). In terms of postoperative kidney stone removal rate, the experimental group was superior to the control group (OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.41-1.99, P<0.05). In terms of the removal rate of ureteral calculi after surgery, there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR=1.71, 95%CI 0.91-3.20, P=0.10). The success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation was higher in the experimental group (OR=5.77, 95%CI 3.32-10.31, P<0.05). The rate of passive usage balloon dilation in the control group was higher(OR=0.23, 95%CI 0.15-0.35, P<0.05). For the incidence of intraoperative complications, the experimental group was lower (OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.84, P=0.004). For the incidence of postoperative complications, the experimental group was also lower(OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.45-0.90, P=0.01). The operation time of the control group was longer(MD=-4.95, 95%CI -8.90--1.01, P=0.01). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nPresetting double-J-catheter can improve the stone removal rate after flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stone, improve the success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation, reduce the utilization rate of ureteral balloon dilator, reduce the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and shorten the operation time. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nUrinary calculus; Flexible ureteroscopic; Double J stent; Meta-analysis\",\"PeriodicalId\":10343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华泌尿外科杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华泌尿外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华泌尿外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的系统评价输尿管软镜碎石术前预置双j型支架的必要性。方法计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Scopus、万方、CNKI、VIP等数据库中术前预置双j型导尿管对输尿管软镜碎石效果的临床研究。检索时间为数据库建设至2018年11月。以下所有可能的组合被用于搜索:柔性输尿管镜、术前、双J型支架和结石。2名研究者独立进行文献筛选、质量评价和数据提取,使用统计软件RevMan5.3完成Meta分析。结果共筛选32项病例对照试验和14项随机对照试验,共纳入患者17 480例,其中实验组6 211例,对照组11 269例。meta分析结果显示,实验组术后结石整体清除率优于对照组(OR=1.69, 95%CI 1.37 ~ 2.08, P<0.05)。在术后肾结石摘除率方面,实验组优于对照组(OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.41 ~ 1.99, P<0.05)。在输尿管结石术后切除率方面,两组比较差异无统计学意义(OR=1.71, 95%CI 0.91-3.20, P=0.10)。实验组输尿管软镜输尿管鞘植入术成功率较高(OR=5.77, 95%CI 3.32 ~ 10.31, P<0.05)。对照组被动使用球囊扩张率较高(OR=0.23, 95%CI 0.15 ~ 0.35, P<0.05)。术中并发症发生率实验组较对照组低(OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.38 ~ 0.84, P=0.004)。对于术后并发症的发生率,实验组也较低(OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.45-0.90, P=0.01)。对照组手术时间较长(MD=-4.95, 95%CI -8.90—1.01,P=0.01)。结论预置双j型导尿管可提高输尿管软镜碎石治疗肾结石后的结石取出率,提高输尿管软镜通路鞘植入术成功率,降低输尿管球囊扩张器的使用率,减少术中术后并发症的发生,缩短手术时间。关键词:尿路结石;灵活ureteroscopic;双J型支架;荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The necessity of presetting ureteral stents before ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis
Objective To systematically evaluate the necessity of presetting double-J stent before flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy. Methods Computer retrieved clinical studies on the effect of preoperative presetting double-J-catheter on flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Wan fang, CNKI and VIP databases were reviewed. The retrieval time was from the database construction to November 2018. All of the possible combinations of the following terms were used for the search: flexible ureteroscopic, preoperative, double J stent, and calculus. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality evaluation and data extraction, and completed Meta analysis by using statistical software RevMan5.3. Results Thirty-two case-control trials and 14 randomized controlled trials were screened, with a total of 17 480 patients, including 6 211 patients in the experimental group and 11 269 patients in the control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the experimental group was superior to the control group in term of the overall postoperative stone clearance rate (OR=1.69, 95%CI 1.37-2.08, P<0.05). In terms of postoperative kidney stone removal rate, the experimental group was superior to the control group (OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.41-1.99, P<0.05). In terms of the removal rate of ureteral calculi after surgery, there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR=1.71, 95%CI 0.91-3.20, P=0.10). The success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation was higher in the experimental group (OR=5.77, 95%CI 3.32-10.31, P<0.05). The rate of passive usage balloon dilation in the control group was higher(OR=0.23, 95%CI 0.15-0.35, P<0.05). For the incidence of intraoperative complications, the experimental group was lower (OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.84, P=0.004). For the incidence of postoperative complications, the experimental group was also lower(OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.45-0.90, P=0.01). The operation time of the control group was longer(MD=-4.95, 95%CI -8.90--1.01, P=0.01). Conclusions Presetting double-J-catheter can improve the stone removal rate after flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stone, improve the success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation, reduce the utilization rate of ureteral balloon dilator, reduce the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and shorten the operation time. Key words: Urinary calculus; Flexible ureteroscopic; Double J stent; Meta-analysis
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华泌尿外科杂志
中华泌尿外科杂志 Medicine-Nephrology
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14180
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Urology (monthly) was founded in 1980. It is a publicly issued academic journal supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and comments in this field. This journal mainly reports on the latest scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the professional field of urology at home and abroad, as well as basic theoretical research results closely related to clinical practice. The journal has columns such as treatises, abstracts of treatises, experimental studies, case reports, experience exchanges, reviews, reviews, lectures, etc. Chinese Journal of Urology has been included in well-known databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Chinese Science Citation Database Source Journal (including extended version), and also included in American Chemical Abstracts (CA). The journal has been rated as a quality journal by the Association for Science and Technology and as an excellent journal by the Chinese Medical Association.
期刊最新文献
Clinical application of different bladder neck separation techniques in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Analysis of risk factors for acute kidney injury after radical nephrectomy Characteristics of urinary microflora in women with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy without lower urinary tract symptoms A case report of primary leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord Establishment and validation of nomogram for positive surgical margin of prostate cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1