{"title":"输尿管镜碎石前预先放置输尿管支架的必要性:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Yi Zhang, Xiulan Wang, Ji Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo systematically evaluate the necessity of presetting double-J stent before flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy. \n \n \nMethods \nComputer retrieved clinical studies on the effect of preoperative presetting double-J-catheter on flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Wan fang, CNKI and VIP databases were reviewed. The retrieval time was from the database construction to November 2018. All of the possible combinations of the following terms were used for the search: flexible ureteroscopic, preoperative, double J stent, and calculus. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality evaluation and data extraction, and completed Meta analysis by using statistical software RevMan5.3. \n \n \nResults \nThirty-two case-control trials and 14 randomized controlled trials were screened, with a total of 17 480 patients, including 6 211 patients in the experimental group and 11 269 patients in the control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the experimental group was superior to the control group in term of the overall postoperative stone clearance rate (OR=1.69, 95%CI 1.37-2.08, P<0.05). In terms of postoperative kidney stone removal rate, the experimental group was superior to the control group (OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.41-1.99, P<0.05). In terms of the removal rate of ureteral calculi after surgery, there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR=1.71, 95%CI 0.91-3.20, P=0.10). The success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation was higher in the experimental group (OR=5.77, 95%CI 3.32-10.31, P<0.05). The rate of passive usage balloon dilation in the control group was higher(OR=0.23, 95%CI 0.15-0.35, P<0.05). For the incidence of intraoperative complications, the experimental group was lower (OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.84, P=0.004). For the incidence of postoperative complications, the experimental group was also lower(OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.45-0.90, P=0.01). The operation time of the control group was longer(MD=-4.95, 95%CI -8.90--1.01, P=0.01). \n \n \nConclusions \nPresetting double-J-catheter can improve the stone removal rate after flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stone, improve the success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation, reduce the utilization rate of ureteral balloon dilator, reduce the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and shorten the operation time. \n \n \nKey words: \nUrinary calculus; Flexible ureteroscopic; Double J stent; Meta-analysis","PeriodicalId":10343,"journal":{"name":"中华泌尿外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The necessity of presetting ureteral stents before ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yi Zhang, Xiulan Wang, Ji Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo systematically evaluate the necessity of presetting double-J stent before flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nComputer retrieved clinical studies on the effect of preoperative presetting double-J-catheter on flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Wan fang, CNKI and VIP databases were reviewed. The retrieval time was from the database construction to November 2018. All of the possible combinations of the following terms were used for the search: flexible ureteroscopic, preoperative, double J stent, and calculus. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality evaluation and data extraction, and completed Meta analysis by using statistical software RevMan5.3. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThirty-two case-control trials and 14 randomized controlled trials were screened, with a total of 17 480 patients, including 6 211 patients in the experimental group and 11 269 patients in the control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the experimental group was superior to the control group in term of the overall postoperative stone clearance rate (OR=1.69, 95%CI 1.37-2.08, P<0.05). In terms of postoperative kidney stone removal rate, the experimental group was superior to the control group (OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.41-1.99, P<0.05). In terms of the removal rate of ureteral calculi after surgery, there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR=1.71, 95%CI 0.91-3.20, P=0.10). The success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation was higher in the experimental group (OR=5.77, 95%CI 3.32-10.31, P<0.05). The rate of passive usage balloon dilation in the control group was higher(OR=0.23, 95%CI 0.15-0.35, P<0.05). For the incidence of intraoperative complications, the experimental group was lower (OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.84, P=0.004). For the incidence of postoperative complications, the experimental group was also lower(OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.45-0.90, P=0.01). The operation time of the control group was longer(MD=-4.95, 95%CI -8.90--1.01, P=0.01). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nPresetting double-J-catheter can improve the stone removal rate after flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stone, improve the success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation, reduce the utilization rate of ureteral balloon dilator, reduce the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and shorten the operation time. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nUrinary calculus; Flexible ureteroscopic; Double J stent; Meta-analysis\",\"PeriodicalId\":10343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华泌尿外科杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华泌尿外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华泌尿外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
The necessity of presetting ureteral stents before ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis
Objective
To systematically evaluate the necessity of presetting double-J stent before flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy.
Methods
Computer retrieved clinical studies on the effect of preoperative presetting double-J-catheter on flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Wan fang, CNKI and VIP databases were reviewed. The retrieval time was from the database construction to November 2018. All of the possible combinations of the following terms were used for the search: flexible ureteroscopic, preoperative, double J stent, and calculus. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality evaluation and data extraction, and completed Meta analysis by using statistical software RevMan5.3.
Results
Thirty-two case-control trials and 14 randomized controlled trials were screened, with a total of 17 480 patients, including 6 211 patients in the experimental group and 11 269 patients in the control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the experimental group was superior to the control group in term of the overall postoperative stone clearance rate (OR=1.69, 95%CI 1.37-2.08, P<0.05). In terms of postoperative kidney stone removal rate, the experimental group was superior to the control group (OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.41-1.99, P<0.05). In terms of the removal rate of ureteral calculi after surgery, there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR=1.71, 95%CI 0.91-3.20, P=0.10). The success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation was higher in the experimental group (OR=5.77, 95%CI 3.32-10.31, P<0.05). The rate of passive usage balloon dilation in the control group was higher(OR=0.23, 95%CI 0.15-0.35, P<0.05). For the incidence of intraoperative complications, the experimental group was lower (OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.84, P=0.004). For the incidence of postoperative complications, the experimental group was also lower(OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.45-0.90, P=0.01). The operation time of the control group was longer(MD=-4.95, 95%CI -8.90--1.01, P=0.01).
Conclusions
Presetting double-J-catheter can improve the stone removal rate after flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stone, improve the success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation, reduce the utilization rate of ureteral balloon dilator, reduce the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and shorten the operation time.
Key words:
Urinary calculus; Flexible ureteroscopic; Double J stent; Meta-analysis
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Urology (monthly) was founded in 1980. It is a publicly issued academic journal supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and comments in this field. This journal mainly reports on the latest scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the professional field of urology at home and abroad, as well as basic theoretical research results closely related to clinical practice.
The journal has columns such as treatises, abstracts of treatises, experimental studies, case reports, experience exchanges, reviews, reviews, lectures, etc.
Chinese Journal of Urology has been included in well-known databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Chinese Science Citation Database Source Journal (including extended version), and also included in American Chemical Abstracts (CA). The journal has been rated as a quality journal by the Association for Science and Technology and as an excellent journal by the Chinese Medical Association.