Daniel Franco-Estrada, E. Ortiz, J. Villaseñor, S. Arias
{"title":"白头Pilosocereus leuccephalus group s.s.(仙人掌科)物种分布模型及物种分布和生态位偏好的预测变量","authors":"Daniel Franco-Estrada, E. Ortiz, J. Villaseñor, S. Arias","doi":"10.1080/14772000.2022.2128928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecological niche modelling is useful in estimating the environmental requirements of species and, by extension, can also estimate their distributional areas. For most cacti, ecological niche modelling and comparisons between species have only been performed for a set of variables mainly associated with temperature and precipitation. To expand environmental predictors in addition to climate variables, we use topographic and edaphic variables. The aims of this study were to determine which environmental factors influence the geographical distribution of the P. leucocephalus species group s.s. from Mexico and Central America, to build species distribution models, and to assess whether species have different climatic preferences. Based on ecological niche modelling, the main environmental variables that contribute to the distribution of species and the similarities or differences in ecological niches between species were inferred using Maxent and ENMTools. The results revealed that the studied species had different responses to environmental variables, resulting in a unique combination of conditions for each species, showing only six environmental variables in common. In general, variables with the greatest contributions to the models were climatic, followed by edaphic and topographic variables. The results of the quantification of niches between species showed that there was less than 0.5 overlap in Schoener’s D values, suggesting niche divergence for the group species but in environments more similar than would be expected by random chance. Although species shared affinities for seasonally dry tropical forests, the importance of preferences for different sets of environmental variables by each species was clear. In addition, niche divergence between closely related species of the P. leucocephalus group s.s. is concordant with the previous delimitation at the species level.","PeriodicalId":54437,"journal":{"name":"Systematics and Biodiversity","volume":" ","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Species distribution modelling and predictor variables for species distribution and niche preferences of Pilosocereus leucocephalus group s.s. (Cactaceae)\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Franco-Estrada, E. Ortiz, J. Villaseñor, S. Arias\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14772000.2022.2128928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ecological niche modelling is useful in estimating the environmental requirements of species and, by extension, can also estimate their distributional areas. For most cacti, ecological niche modelling and comparisons between species have only been performed for a set of variables mainly associated with temperature and precipitation. To expand environmental predictors in addition to climate variables, we use topographic and edaphic variables. The aims of this study were to determine which environmental factors influence the geographical distribution of the P. leucocephalus species group s.s. from Mexico and Central America, to build species distribution models, and to assess whether species have different climatic preferences. Based on ecological niche modelling, the main environmental variables that contribute to the distribution of species and the similarities or differences in ecological niches between species were inferred using Maxent and ENMTools. The results revealed that the studied species had different responses to environmental variables, resulting in a unique combination of conditions for each species, showing only six environmental variables in common. In general, variables with the greatest contributions to the models were climatic, followed by edaphic and topographic variables. The results of the quantification of niches between species showed that there was less than 0.5 overlap in Schoener’s D values, suggesting niche divergence for the group species but in environments more similar than would be expected by random chance. Although species shared affinities for seasonally dry tropical forests, the importance of preferences for different sets of environmental variables by each species was clear. In addition, niche divergence between closely related species of the P. leucocephalus group s.s. is concordant with the previous delimitation at the species level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematics and Biodiversity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1 - 17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematics and Biodiversity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2022.2128928\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematics and Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2022.2128928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Species distribution modelling and predictor variables for species distribution and niche preferences of Pilosocereus leucocephalus group s.s. (Cactaceae)
Ecological niche modelling is useful in estimating the environmental requirements of species and, by extension, can also estimate their distributional areas. For most cacti, ecological niche modelling and comparisons between species have only been performed for a set of variables mainly associated with temperature and precipitation. To expand environmental predictors in addition to climate variables, we use topographic and edaphic variables. The aims of this study were to determine which environmental factors influence the geographical distribution of the P. leucocephalus species group s.s. from Mexico and Central America, to build species distribution models, and to assess whether species have different climatic preferences. Based on ecological niche modelling, the main environmental variables that contribute to the distribution of species and the similarities or differences in ecological niches between species were inferred using Maxent and ENMTools. The results revealed that the studied species had different responses to environmental variables, resulting in a unique combination of conditions for each species, showing only six environmental variables in common. In general, variables with the greatest contributions to the models were climatic, followed by edaphic and topographic variables. The results of the quantification of niches between species showed that there was less than 0.5 overlap in Schoener’s D values, suggesting niche divergence for the group species but in environments more similar than would be expected by random chance. Although species shared affinities for seasonally dry tropical forests, the importance of preferences for different sets of environmental variables by each species was clear. In addition, niche divergence between closely related species of the P. leucocephalus group s.s. is concordant with the previous delimitation at the species level.
期刊介绍:
Systematics and Biodiversity is devoted to whole-organism biology. It is a quarterly, international, peer-reviewed, life science journal, without page charges, which is published by Taylor & Francis for The Natural History Museum, London. The criterion for publication is scientific merit. Systematics and Biodiversity documents the diversity of organisms in all natural phyla, through taxonomic papers that have a broad context (not single species descriptions), while also addressing topical issues relating to biological collections, and the principles of systematics. It particularly emphasises the importance and multi-disciplinary significance of systematics, with contributions which address the implications of other fields for systematics, or which advance our understanding of other fields through taxonomic knowledge, especially in relation to the nature, origins, and conservation of biodiversity, at all taxonomic levels.
The journal does not publish single species descriptions, monographs or applied research nor alpha species descriptions. Taxonomic manuscripts must include modern methods such as cladistics or phylogenetic analysis.