移民农场小说,“农业健康”和种族化的自耕农,1890-1950:参考书目

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN RESOURCES FOR AMERICAN LITERARY STUDY Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.5325/resoamerlitestud.44.1-2.0234
M. Farland
{"title":"移民农场小说,“农业健康”和种族化的自耕农,1890-1950:参考书目","authors":"M. Farland","doi":"10.5325/resoamerlitestud.44.1-2.0234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This annotated bibliography uncovers a forgotten body of immigrant farm fiction published from 1900 to 1950 and examines the cultural work of these novels in responding to xenophobic, nativist conceptions of immigrants as unfit for farming. Agricultural fitness discourse warned of the perceived threat to US-born writers posed by immigration, calling immigrants “unfit” to farm and viewing white, northern Europeans as the most capable and productive farmers. Employing racialized topes, characters, and plots, some farm fiction writers echoed the xenophobic idea that immigrants lagged behind US-born farmers, whereas others depicted immigrants at the vanguard of modern capitalist agriculture—defined in terms of mechanization, scientific agriculture, and agribusiness—with US-born farmers seen falling behind. These farm fictions reveal that the wider conflict around US immigration was rooted in the rural as much as the urban cultural imaginary. They engaged with the era’s public and legislative debates surrounding immigration restrictions and the decline of the family farm.","PeriodicalId":29835,"journal":{"name":"RESOURCES FOR AMERICAN LITERARY STUDY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immigrant Farm Fiction, “Agricultural Fitness,” and the Racialized Yeoman Farmer, 1890–1950: A Bibliography\",\"authors\":\"M. Farland\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/resoamerlitestud.44.1-2.0234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This annotated bibliography uncovers a forgotten body of immigrant farm fiction published from 1900 to 1950 and examines the cultural work of these novels in responding to xenophobic, nativist conceptions of immigrants as unfit for farming. Agricultural fitness discourse warned of the perceived threat to US-born writers posed by immigration, calling immigrants “unfit” to farm and viewing white, northern Europeans as the most capable and productive farmers. Employing racialized topes, characters, and plots, some farm fiction writers echoed the xenophobic idea that immigrants lagged behind US-born farmers, whereas others depicted immigrants at the vanguard of modern capitalist agriculture—defined in terms of mechanization, scientific agriculture, and agribusiness—with US-born farmers seen falling behind. These farm fictions reveal that the wider conflict around US immigration was rooted in the rural as much as the urban cultural imaginary. They engaged with the era’s public and legislative debates surrounding immigration restrictions and the decline of the family farm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RESOURCES FOR AMERICAN LITERARY STUDY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RESOURCES FOR AMERICAN LITERARY STUDY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/resoamerlitestud.44.1-2.0234\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RESOURCES FOR AMERICAN LITERARY STUDY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/resoamerlitestud.44.1-2.0234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个带注释的参考书目揭示了1900年至1950年间出版的一组被遗忘的移民农场小说,并研究了这些小说的文化作品,以回应仇外的、本土主义的移民不适合务农的观念。农业健康话语警告说,移民对美国出生的作家构成了明显的威胁,称移民“不适合”务农,并将北欧白人视为最有能力和生产力的农民。一些农场小说作家采用种族化的题材、人物和情节,呼应了移民落后于美国出生的农民的仇外思想,而另一些人则把移民描绘成现代资本主义农业(以机械化、科学农业和农业综合企业为定义)的先锋,而美国出生的农民则被视为落后。这些关于农场的小说表明,围绕美国移民的更广泛的冲突,既根植于城市文化想象,也根植于农村。他们参与了当时围绕移民限制和家庭农场衰落的公众和立法辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Immigrant Farm Fiction, “Agricultural Fitness,” and the Racialized Yeoman Farmer, 1890–1950: A Bibliography
This annotated bibliography uncovers a forgotten body of immigrant farm fiction published from 1900 to 1950 and examines the cultural work of these novels in responding to xenophobic, nativist conceptions of immigrants as unfit for farming. Agricultural fitness discourse warned of the perceived threat to US-born writers posed by immigration, calling immigrants “unfit” to farm and viewing white, northern Europeans as the most capable and productive farmers. Employing racialized topes, characters, and plots, some farm fiction writers echoed the xenophobic idea that immigrants lagged behind US-born farmers, whereas others depicted immigrants at the vanguard of modern capitalist agriculture—defined in terms of mechanization, scientific agriculture, and agribusiness—with US-born farmers seen falling behind. These farm fictions reveal that the wider conflict around US immigration was rooted in the rural as much as the urban cultural imaginary. They engaged with the era’s public and legislative debates surrounding immigration restrictions and the decline of the family farm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Amber Amulet: A Tale of India and England by Louisa May Alcott Ruth Stone’s Vast Library of the Female Mind Sound Recording Technology and American Literature: From the Phonograph to the Remix A Whole World: Letters from James Merrill An Unpublished “Family Heirloom”: Frederick William Beecher’s 1855 Williams College Journal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1