SHAPE美国和物理素养:事件视界?

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education Pub Date : 2021-04-05 DOI:10.1080/25742981.2021.1908835
D. Landi, T. Blackshear, C. McFadden
{"title":"SHAPE美国和物理素养:事件视界?","authors":"D. Landi, T. Blackshear, C. McFadden","doi":"10.1080/25742981.2021.1908835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, we reflect on SHAPE America’s K-12 National Standards and its connection to physical literacy. We argue physical educators in the United States have primarily engaged with the term physical literacy without engaging with the theoretical and pedagogical depth of the concept. Despite this, SHAPE America does explicitly endorse an adapted version of Whitehead’s definition of the physical literacy concept. In drawing on feminist intersectional thought, we make an argument that SHAPE America’s adoption of physical literacy has produced an era of ‘disorientation’ in United States physical education. Within this disorientation, much of the advancements made in theory, pedagogy, sociocultural issues, as well as curriculum have been lost. We conclude by calling for a revamping of the standards that are not bound to a single concept, model or theoretical paradigm.","PeriodicalId":36887,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"106 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25742981.2021.1908835","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SHAPE America and physical literacy: an event horizon?\",\"authors\":\"D. Landi, T. Blackshear, C. McFadden\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25742981.2021.1908835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this paper, we reflect on SHAPE America’s K-12 National Standards and its connection to physical literacy. We argue physical educators in the United States have primarily engaged with the term physical literacy without engaging with the theoretical and pedagogical depth of the concept. Despite this, SHAPE America does explicitly endorse an adapted version of Whitehead’s definition of the physical literacy concept. In drawing on feminist intersectional thought, we make an argument that SHAPE America’s adoption of physical literacy has produced an era of ‘disorientation’ in United States physical education. Within this disorientation, much of the advancements made in theory, pedagogy, sociocultural issues, as well as curriculum have been lost. We conclude by calling for a revamping of the standards that are not bound to a single concept, model or theoretical paradigm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"106 - 122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25742981.2021.1908835\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2021.1908835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2021.1908835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要在本文中,我们反思了SHAPE美国K-12国家标准及其与体育素养的关系。我们认为,美国的体育教育工作者主要使用“体育素养”一词,而没有使用该概念的理论和教学深度。尽管如此,SHAPE America确实明确支持怀特黑德对物理识字概念的定义的改编版本。在借鉴女权主义交叉思想的基础上,我们提出了一个论点,即SHAPE America对体育素养的采用在美国体育教育中产生了一个“迷失方向”的时代。在这种迷失方向的情况下,在理论、教育学、社会文化问题以及课程方面取得的许多进步都付诸东流。最后,我们呼吁修改不受单一概念、模型或理论范式约束的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SHAPE America and physical literacy: an event horizon?
ABSTRACT In this paper, we reflect on SHAPE America’s K-12 National Standards and its connection to physical literacy. We argue physical educators in the United States have primarily engaged with the term physical literacy without engaging with the theoretical and pedagogical depth of the concept. Despite this, SHAPE America does explicitly endorse an adapted version of Whitehead’s definition of the physical literacy concept. In drawing on feminist intersectional thought, we make an argument that SHAPE America’s adoption of physical literacy has produced an era of ‘disorientation’ in United States physical education. Within this disorientation, much of the advancements made in theory, pedagogy, sociocultural issues, as well as curriculum have been lost. We conclude by calling for a revamping of the standards that are not bound to a single concept, model or theoretical paradigm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Physical education pedagogies for health Physical education pedagogies for health , edited by Lorraine Cale and Jo Harris, London and New York, Routledge, 2022, 142 pp., US$64.95 ISBN 978-1-003-22590-4. ‘Publicness of education’: framing possibilities for decolonising practices in Health and Physical Education Preservice teachers’ health literacy levels and perceptions of teaching capabilities: an Australian case study ‘Sometimes unfair is fair’: New Zealand HPE teachers’ perceptions of social justice Benefits of hybridising the activist approach and teaching games for understanding to empower girls in physical education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1