“繁文缛节是女人的罪过”:17世纪女性写作中的长篇大论

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Quaker Studies Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.3828/QUAKER.2021.26.1.3
E. Start
{"title":"“繁文缛节是女人的罪过”:17世纪女性写作中的长篇大论","authors":"E. Start","doi":"10.3828/QUAKER.2021.26.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nGendered critiques of language have long been a feature of written discourse, and perhaps in no era more tellingly than the seventeenth century, a period in which female writers came to the fore and told their stories for the very first time. Through an examination of This is a Short Relation of Some of the Cruel Sufferings (For the Truth’s Sake) of Katherine Evans and Sarah Cheevers (1662) and Mary Trye’s 1675 treatise Medicatrix, this essay explores the assumption that women’s writing is long-winded. Assessing their religious, medical and even proto-feminist messages, the essay analyses rhetorical devices and their effect, and how context heavily influenced the length of each publication. More than an historical record of their struggle, these texts articulate the voices of women previously unheard. While the two texts would seem at odds, the former concerning Quakerism and the latter medicine, they prove comparable in all their contrasts, revealing how women during this period of history displayed extraordinary innovation in their writing.","PeriodicalId":36790,"journal":{"name":"Quaker Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"111-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Prolixity is a Woman’s Crime’: Assessing Long-windedness in Seventeenth-century Women’s Writing\",\"authors\":\"E. Start\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/QUAKER.2021.26.1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nGendered critiques of language have long been a feature of written discourse, and perhaps in no era more tellingly than the seventeenth century, a period in which female writers came to the fore and told their stories for the very first time. Through an examination of This is a Short Relation of Some of the Cruel Sufferings (For the Truth’s Sake) of Katherine Evans and Sarah Cheevers (1662) and Mary Trye’s 1675 treatise Medicatrix, this essay explores the assumption that women’s writing is long-winded. Assessing their religious, medical and even proto-feminist messages, the essay analyses rhetorical devices and their effect, and how context heavily influenced the length of each publication. More than an historical record of their struggle, these texts articulate the voices of women previously unheard. While the two texts would seem at odds, the former concerning Quakerism and the latter medicine, they prove comparable in all their contrasts, revealing how women during this period of history displayed extraordinary innovation in their writing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaker Studies\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"111-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaker Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/QUAKER.2021.26.1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaker Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/QUAKER.2021.26.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言的性别批评一直是书面话语的一个特征,也许没有一个时代比17世纪更能说明问题,在这个时期,女性作家第一次脱颖而出,讲述了她们的故事。通过对《这是凯瑟琳·埃文斯和萨拉·奇弗斯的一些残酷苦难的简短叙述》(1662)和玛丽·特莱1675年的专著《女医生》(Medicatrix)的考察,本文探讨了女性写作是冗长的假设。这篇文章评估了它们的宗教、医学甚至是原始女权主义信息,分析了修辞手法及其效果,以及语境如何严重影响了每篇文章的长度。这些文本不仅是她们斗争的历史记录,而且清楚地表达了以前闻所未闻的妇女的声音。虽然这两篇文章似乎不一致,前者关于贵格会教,后者关于医学,但它们在所有对比中都证明了可比性,揭示了这一历史时期的女性如何在写作中表现出非凡的创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Prolixity is a Woman’s Crime’: Assessing Long-windedness in Seventeenth-century Women’s Writing
Gendered critiques of language have long been a feature of written discourse, and perhaps in no era more tellingly than the seventeenth century, a period in which female writers came to the fore and told their stories for the very first time. Through an examination of This is a Short Relation of Some of the Cruel Sufferings (For the Truth’s Sake) of Katherine Evans and Sarah Cheevers (1662) and Mary Trye’s 1675 treatise Medicatrix, this essay explores the assumption that women’s writing is long-winded. Assessing their religious, medical and even proto-feminist messages, the essay analyses rhetorical devices and their effect, and how context heavily influenced the length of each publication. More than an historical record of their struggle, these texts articulate the voices of women previously unheard. While the two texts would seem at odds, the former concerning Quakerism and the latter medicine, they prove comparable in all their contrasts, revealing how women during this period of history displayed extraordinary innovation in their writing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quaker Studies
Quaker Studies Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
John Woolman’s Intersecting Testimonies against Enslavement, Colonialism and the Rum Trade John Woolman and ‘The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth’ Selecting from the Writings of John Woolman: ‘On Christian Moderation’ The Seed and the Day of Small Things: Finding Power and Powerlessness in Quaker Theology John Woolman Special Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1