只是时间问题。零售支付市场中数字金融消费者的脆弱性

Q2 Social Sciences European Business Law Review Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.54648/eulr2022027
Maria Cecilia Paglietti, Maddalena Rabitti
{"title":"只是时间问题。零售支付市场中数字金融消费者的脆弱性","authors":"Maria Cecilia Paglietti, Maddalena Rabitti","doi":"10.54648/eulr2022027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article aims to conceptualize the figure of the digital-financial payment consumer, which combines two separate -and ex se relevant- sources of vulnerability: digital vulnerability and financial vulnerability.\nThe first part, -after summarizing the legal framework on digitizing payment, the social context and the policy lines- deals with the need of applying the concept of “neutrality of regulation” to avoid possible conflicts of rules between interconnected ecosystems, such as digital payments, digital platforms and blockchain. Having consumer protection in mind, it also addresses the cumulative and coherent application of different sets of rules.\nThe second part looks in more detail at digital-financial consumer vulnerability, describing the possible implications at regulatory level and the consequences that this new kind of vulnerability brings at the level of political choices, the obligations of financial players and the conduct of a consumer who is part of a payment service contract, adopting both the point of view of public law (in terms of policy choices) and private law (intersubjective relations).\nThe article concludes that, among the different sources of vulnerability, age appears to be the key issue when assessing the vulnerability of digital payment consumers. Once detected, this new kind of vulnerability is specifically relevant to the banks’s disclosure obligations (which should be synthetic and selective), and in terms of product design and product governance (companies should “tailor” their products specifically to the group’s customer profile they intend to reach). On the consumer side, the same behaviour should be assessed differently depending on the specific vulnerability of the consumer involved. The paper deals here with the level of gross negligence in case of unauthorized digital payment (phishing).\nInstant digital payments, digital platforms, blockchain, fraud, liability, consumer protection, speed, security, loss allocation, vulnerability, financial vulnerability, digital vulnerability, financial inclusion, grey digital divide","PeriodicalId":53431,"journal":{"name":"European Business Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Matter of Time. Digital-Financial Consumers’ Vulnerability in the Retail Payments Market\",\"authors\":\"Maria Cecilia Paglietti, Maddalena Rabitti\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/eulr2022027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Article aims to conceptualize the figure of the digital-financial payment consumer, which combines two separate -and ex se relevant- sources of vulnerability: digital vulnerability and financial vulnerability.\\nThe first part, -after summarizing the legal framework on digitizing payment, the social context and the policy lines- deals with the need of applying the concept of “neutrality of regulation” to avoid possible conflicts of rules between interconnected ecosystems, such as digital payments, digital platforms and blockchain. Having consumer protection in mind, it also addresses the cumulative and coherent application of different sets of rules.\\nThe second part looks in more detail at digital-financial consumer vulnerability, describing the possible implications at regulatory level and the consequences that this new kind of vulnerability brings at the level of political choices, the obligations of financial players and the conduct of a consumer who is part of a payment service contract, adopting both the point of view of public law (in terms of policy choices) and private law (intersubjective relations).\\nThe article concludes that, among the different sources of vulnerability, age appears to be the key issue when assessing the vulnerability of digital payment consumers. Once detected, this new kind of vulnerability is specifically relevant to the banks’s disclosure obligations (which should be synthetic and selective), and in terms of product design and product governance (companies should “tailor” their products specifically to the group’s customer profile they intend to reach). On the consumer side, the same behaviour should be assessed differently depending on the specific vulnerability of the consumer involved. The paper deals here with the level of gross negligence in case of unauthorized digital payment (phishing).\\nInstant digital payments, digital platforms, blockchain, fraud, liability, consumer protection, speed, security, loss allocation, vulnerability, financial vulnerability, digital vulnerability, financial inclusion, grey digital divide\",\"PeriodicalId\":53431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在概念化数字金融支付消费者的形象,它结合了两个独立的、但实际上相关的脆弱性来源:数字脆弱性和金融脆弱性。第一部分,在总结了数字化支付的法律框架、社会背景和政策路线之后,讨论了应用“监管中立”概念的必要性,以避免相互关联的生态系统(如数字支付、数字平台和区块链)之间可能出现的规则冲突。考虑到消费者保护,它还解决了不同规则集的累积和连贯应用问题。第二部分更详细地研究了数字金融消费者的脆弱性,描述了监管层面的可能影响,以及这种新型脆弱性在政治选择层面带来的后果,金融参与者的义务以及作为支付服务合同一部分的消费者的行为,采用了公法(就政策选择而言)和私法(主体间关系)的观点。文章的结论是,在不同的漏洞来源中,年龄似乎是评估数字支付消费者脆弱性的关键问题。一旦被发现,这种新的漏洞与银行的披露义务(这应该是综合的和选择性的),以及产品设计和产品治理(公司应该根据他们打算接触的集团客户的情况专门“定制”他们的产品)特别相关。在消费者方面,同样的行为应根据所涉消费者的具体脆弱性进行不同的评估。本文讨论了在未经授权的数字支付(网络钓鱼)情况下的重大过失级别。即时数字支付、数字平台、区块链、欺诈、责任、消费者保护、速度、安全、损失分配、脆弱性、金融脆弱性、数字脆弱性、金融普惠、灰色数字鸿沟
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Matter of Time. Digital-Financial Consumers’ Vulnerability in the Retail Payments Market
This Article aims to conceptualize the figure of the digital-financial payment consumer, which combines two separate -and ex se relevant- sources of vulnerability: digital vulnerability and financial vulnerability. The first part, -after summarizing the legal framework on digitizing payment, the social context and the policy lines- deals with the need of applying the concept of “neutrality of regulation” to avoid possible conflicts of rules between interconnected ecosystems, such as digital payments, digital platforms and blockchain. Having consumer protection in mind, it also addresses the cumulative and coherent application of different sets of rules. The second part looks in more detail at digital-financial consumer vulnerability, describing the possible implications at regulatory level and the consequences that this new kind of vulnerability brings at the level of political choices, the obligations of financial players and the conduct of a consumer who is part of a payment service contract, adopting both the point of view of public law (in terms of policy choices) and private law (intersubjective relations). The article concludes that, among the different sources of vulnerability, age appears to be the key issue when assessing the vulnerability of digital payment consumers. Once detected, this new kind of vulnerability is specifically relevant to the banks’s disclosure obligations (which should be synthetic and selective), and in terms of product design and product governance (companies should “tailor” their products specifically to the group’s customer profile they intend to reach). On the consumer side, the same behaviour should be assessed differently depending on the specific vulnerability of the consumer involved. The paper deals here with the level of gross negligence in case of unauthorized digital payment (phishing). Instant digital payments, digital platforms, blockchain, fraud, liability, consumer protection, speed, security, loss allocation, vulnerability, financial vulnerability, digital vulnerability, financial inclusion, grey digital divide
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Business Law Review
European Business Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The mission of the European Business Law Review is to provide a forum for analysis and discussion of business law, including European Union law and the laws of the Member States and other European countries, as well as legal frameworks and issues in international and comparative contexts. The Review moves freely over the boundaries that divide the law, and covers business law, broadly defined, in public or private law, domestic, European or international law. Our topics of interest include commercial, financial, corporate, private and regulatory laws with a broadly business dimension. The Review offers current, authoritative scholarship on a wide range of issues and developments, featuring contributors providing an international as well as a European perspective. The Review is an invaluable source of current scholarship, information, practical analysis, and expert guidance for all practising lawyers, advisers, and scholars dealing with European business law on a regular basis. The Review has over 25 years established the highest scholarly standards. It distinguishes itself as open-minded, embracing interests that appeal to the scholarly, practitioner and policy-making spheres. It practices strict routines of peer review. The Review imposes no word limit on submissions, subject to the appropriateness of the word length to the subject under discussion.
期刊最新文献
Article: Legislation Comment: Considerations on the Digital Markets Act, the Way to a Fair and Open Digital Environment Article: Open-Price Contracts Under the CISG: The Law in Action Article: EU Law and the Member States’ Competence to Regulate the Operation of Collaborative Economy Platforms – Where Do We Stand after the Digital Services Act Article: The Systemic Importance of Asset Managers: A Case Study for the Future of SIFI Regulation Article: Codes of Conduct in German Employment Relationships – A Measure to Adequately Implementing Compliance and Data Protection?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1