{"title":"只是时间问题。零售支付市场中数字金融消费者的脆弱性","authors":"Maria Cecilia Paglietti, Maddalena Rabitti","doi":"10.54648/eulr2022027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article aims to conceptualize the figure of the digital-financial payment consumer, which combines two separate -and ex se relevant- sources of vulnerability: digital vulnerability and financial vulnerability.\nThe first part, -after summarizing the legal framework on digitizing payment, the social context and the policy lines- deals with the need of applying the concept of “neutrality of regulation” to avoid possible conflicts of rules between interconnected ecosystems, such as digital payments, digital platforms and blockchain. Having consumer protection in mind, it also addresses the cumulative and coherent application of different sets of rules.\nThe second part looks in more detail at digital-financial consumer vulnerability, describing the possible implications at regulatory level and the consequences that this new kind of vulnerability brings at the level of political choices, the obligations of financial players and the conduct of a consumer who is part of a payment service contract, adopting both the point of view of public law (in terms of policy choices) and private law (intersubjective relations).\nThe article concludes that, among the different sources of vulnerability, age appears to be the key issue when assessing the vulnerability of digital payment consumers. Once detected, this new kind of vulnerability is specifically relevant to the banks’s disclosure obligations (which should be synthetic and selective), and in terms of product design and product governance (companies should “tailor” their products specifically to the group’s customer profile they intend to reach). On the consumer side, the same behaviour should be assessed differently depending on the specific vulnerability of the consumer involved. The paper deals here with the level of gross negligence in case of unauthorized digital payment (phishing).\nInstant digital payments, digital platforms, blockchain, fraud, liability, consumer protection, speed, security, loss allocation, vulnerability, financial vulnerability, digital vulnerability, financial inclusion, grey digital divide","PeriodicalId":53431,"journal":{"name":"European Business Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Matter of Time. Digital-Financial Consumers’ Vulnerability in the Retail Payments Market\",\"authors\":\"Maria Cecilia Paglietti, Maddalena Rabitti\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/eulr2022027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Article aims to conceptualize the figure of the digital-financial payment consumer, which combines two separate -and ex se relevant- sources of vulnerability: digital vulnerability and financial vulnerability.\\nThe first part, -after summarizing the legal framework on digitizing payment, the social context and the policy lines- deals with the need of applying the concept of “neutrality of regulation” to avoid possible conflicts of rules between interconnected ecosystems, such as digital payments, digital platforms and blockchain. Having consumer protection in mind, it also addresses the cumulative and coherent application of different sets of rules.\\nThe second part looks in more detail at digital-financial consumer vulnerability, describing the possible implications at regulatory level and the consequences that this new kind of vulnerability brings at the level of political choices, the obligations of financial players and the conduct of a consumer who is part of a payment service contract, adopting both the point of view of public law (in terms of policy choices) and private law (intersubjective relations).\\nThe article concludes that, among the different sources of vulnerability, age appears to be the key issue when assessing the vulnerability of digital payment consumers. Once detected, this new kind of vulnerability is specifically relevant to the banks’s disclosure obligations (which should be synthetic and selective), and in terms of product design and product governance (companies should “tailor” their products specifically to the group’s customer profile they intend to reach). On the consumer side, the same behaviour should be assessed differently depending on the specific vulnerability of the consumer involved. The paper deals here with the level of gross negligence in case of unauthorized digital payment (phishing).\\nInstant digital payments, digital platforms, blockchain, fraud, liability, consumer protection, speed, security, loss allocation, vulnerability, financial vulnerability, digital vulnerability, financial inclusion, grey digital divide\",\"PeriodicalId\":53431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Matter of Time. Digital-Financial Consumers’ Vulnerability in the Retail Payments Market
This Article aims to conceptualize the figure of the digital-financial payment consumer, which combines two separate -and ex se relevant- sources of vulnerability: digital vulnerability and financial vulnerability.
The first part, -after summarizing the legal framework on digitizing payment, the social context and the policy lines- deals with the need of applying the concept of “neutrality of regulation” to avoid possible conflicts of rules between interconnected ecosystems, such as digital payments, digital platforms and blockchain. Having consumer protection in mind, it also addresses the cumulative and coherent application of different sets of rules.
The second part looks in more detail at digital-financial consumer vulnerability, describing the possible implications at regulatory level and the consequences that this new kind of vulnerability brings at the level of political choices, the obligations of financial players and the conduct of a consumer who is part of a payment service contract, adopting both the point of view of public law (in terms of policy choices) and private law (intersubjective relations).
The article concludes that, among the different sources of vulnerability, age appears to be the key issue when assessing the vulnerability of digital payment consumers. Once detected, this new kind of vulnerability is specifically relevant to the banks’s disclosure obligations (which should be synthetic and selective), and in terms of product design and product governance (companies should “tailor” their products specifically to the group’s customer profile they intend to reach). On the consumer side, the same behaviour should be assessed differently depending on the specific vulnerability of the consumer involved. The paper deals here with the level of gross negligence in case of unauthorized digital payment (phishing).
Instant digital payments, digital platforms, blockchain, fraud, liability, consumer protection, speed, security, loss allocation, vulnerability, financial vulnerability, digital vulnerability, financial inclusion, grey digital divide
期刊介绍:
The mission of the European Business Law Review is to provide a forum for analysis and discussion of business law, including European Union law and the laws of the Member States and other European countries, as well as legal frameworks and issues in international and comparative contexts. The Review moves freely over the boundaries that divide the law, and covers business law, broadly defined, in public or private law, domestic, European or international law. Our topics of interest include commercial, financial, corporate, private and regulatory laws with a broadly business dimension. The Review offers current, authoritative scholarship on a wide range of issues and developments, featuring contributors providing an international as well as a European perspective. The Review is an invaluable source of current scholarship, information, practical analysis, and expert guidance for all practising lawyers, advisers, and scholars dealing with European business law on a regular basis. The Review has over 25 years established the highest scholarly standards. It distinguishes itself as open-minded, embracing interests that appeal to the scholarly, practitioner and policy-making spheres. It practices strict routines of peer review. The Review imposes no word limit on submissions, subject to the appropriateness of the word length to the subject under discussion.