基于多层感知机和径向基函数法的流域灌溉系统设计

Q3 Environmental Science Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.25130/tjes.30.2.7
Abdulwahd Kassem, Khalil K. Hamadaminb
{"title":"基于多层感知机和径向基函数法的流域灌溉系统设计","authors":"Abdulwahd Kassem, Khalil K. Hamadaminb","doi":"10.25130/tjes.30.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The common use of an artificial neural network model has been in water resources management and planning. The length, width, and discharge of a basin were measured in this study utilizing field data from 160 Dashti Hawler existing projects. Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basic Function (RBF) networks were employed in the basin irrigation assessment. Input factors included the soil type, the conveyance system effectiveness, and the root zone depth. 130 projects were used for calibration, while the remaining 30 were used for validation. When developing the basin irrigation system, the models’ aforementioned indicators’ performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), relative error (RE), and Nash Sutcliff efficiency (NSE). For the basin's length, width, and discharge, the (R2) values for the MLP model were determined to be 0.97, 0.97, and 0.96, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for the RBF model were 0.88, 0.89, and 0.89. Compared to the RBF model, the values of (MAE) for basin length, width, and discharge for the MLP model were determined to be 8.99, 8.52, and 42.58, respectively. However, the (NSE) values for the models mentioned above were 0.95, 0.96, and 0.94, as well as 0.65, 0.66, and 0.66 for the basin’s length, width, and discharge, respectively. When it comes to building the irrigation system for the basin, the MLP is more precise than RBF depending on the values of (R2), (MAE), and (NSE). Finally, the ANN approach uses additional design options quickly examine which model is computationally efficient.","PeriodicalId":30589,"journal":{"name":"Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of Basin Irrigation System using Multilayer Perceptron and Radial Basic Function Methods\",\"authors\":\"Abdulwahd Kassem, Khalil K. Hamadaminb\",\"doi\":\"10.25130/tjes.30.2.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The common use of an artificial neural network model has been in water resources management and planning. The length, width, and discharge of a basin were measured in this study utilizing field data from 160 Dashti Hawler existing projects. Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basic Function (RBF) networks were employed in the basin irrigation assessment. Input factors included the soil type, the conveyance system effectiveness, and the root zone depth. 130 projects were used for calibration, while the remaining 30 were used for validation. When developing the basin irrigation system, the models’ aforementioned indicators’ performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), relative error (RE), and Nash Sutcliff efficiency (NSE). For the basin's length, width, and discharge, the (R2) values for the MLP model were determined to be 0.97, 0.97, and 0.96, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for the RBF model were 0.88, 0.89, and 0.89. Compared to the RBF model, the values of (MAE) for basin length, width, and discharge for the MLP model were determined to be 8.99, 8.52, and 42.58, respectively. However, the (NSE) values for the models mentioned above were 0.95, 0.96, and 0.94, as well as 0.65, 0.66, and 0.66 for the basin’s length, width, and discharge, respectively. When it comes to building the irrigation system for the basin, the MLP is more precise than RBF depending on the values of (R2), (MAE), and (NSE). Finally, the ANN approach uses additional design options quickly examine which model is computationally efficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.30.2.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.30.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工神经网络模型已在水资源管理和规划中得到普遍应用。本研究利用160个Dashti Hawler现有项目的现场数据测量了流域的长度、宽度和流量。采用多层感知器(MLP)和径向基本函数(RBF)网络进行流域灌溉评价。输入因子包括土壤类型、输送系统有效性和根区深度。130个项目用于校准,其余30个项目用于验证。在开发流域灌溉系统时,采用决定系数(R2)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、相对误差(RE)和纳什萨特克利夫效率(NSE)对模型的上述指标进行评价。对于流域的长度、宽度和流量,MLP模型的R2分别为0.97、0.97和0.96,而RBF模型的R2分别为0.88、0.89和0.89。与RBF模型相比,MLP模型的流域长度、流域宽度和流域流量的MAE分别为8.99、8.52和42.58。上述模型的NSE分别为0.95、0.96和0.94,流域长度、宽度和流量的NSE分别为0.65、0.66和0.66。当涉及到为流域建立灌溉系统时,根据(R2)、(MAE)和(NSE)的值,MLP比RBF更精确。最后,人工神经网络方法使用额外的设计选项快速检查哪个模型计算效率高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design of Basin Irrigation System using Multilayer Perceptron and Radial Basic Function Methods
The common use of an artificial neural network model has been in water resources management and planning. The length, width, and discharge of a basin were measured in this study utilizing field data from 160 Dashti Hawler existing projects. Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basic Function (RBF) networks were employed in the basin irrigation assessment. Input factors included the soil type, the conveyance system effectiveness, and the root zone depth. 130 projects were used for calibration, while the remaining 30 were used for validation. When developing the basin irrigation system, the models’ aforementioned indicators’ performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), relative error (RE), and Nash Sutcliff efficiency (NSE). For the basin's length, width, and discharge, the (R2) values for the MLP model were determined to be 0.97, 0.97, and 0.96, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for the RBF model were 0.88, 0.89, and 0.89. Compared to the RBF model, the values of (MAE) for basin length, width, and discharge for the MLP model were determined to be 8.99, 8.52, and 42.58, respectively. However, the (NSE) values for the models mentioned above were 0.95, 0.96, and 0.94, as well as 0.65, 0.66, and 0.66 for the basin’s length, width, and discharge, respectively. When it comes to building the irrigation system for the basin, the MLP is more precise than RBF depending on the values of (R2), (MAE), and (NSE). Finally, the ANN approach uses additional design options quickly examine which model is computationally efficient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Generative AI Chatbot for Engineering Scientific Journal MnO2 Nano Particles Modified a Double Layer Cathode Reactor for an Efficient Removal of DBT in Diesel Underwater Wireless Optical Communication for IOT using Coding MIMO Diversity Climate Change’s Impacts on Drought in Upper Zab Basin, Iraq: A Case Study Cascaded H–Bridge Multilevel Inverter: Review of Topologies and Pulse Width Modulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1