设计诺曼西西里:物质文化与社会

IF 0.2 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of the British Archaeological Association Pub Date : 2022-09-14 DOI:10.1080/00681288.2022.2118410
J. McNeill
{"title":"设计诺曼西西里:物质文化与社会","authors":"J. McNeill","doi":"10.1080/00681288.2022.2118410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"easily struggles to convince against the more compelling conclusions of Manuela Beer’s masterclass in visual analysis. A second submission by Klaus Endemann (previously published in German) constitutes the book’s most substantial single contribution to the general history of the ‘rise of monumental wood sculpture’. Section 3 contains seven individual case studies of medieval crucifixion sculptures. The first four of these relate more or less closely to the Boston Crucifix and include the most celebrated member of the family, the Gero Cross in Cologne. The last three case studies take us beyond the German lands and into the later decades of the 12th century. They are perfectly good essays, but they sit slightly uncomfortably in a collection primarily focused elsewhere. The essays of Section 4 further extend the study’s intellectual horizons to consider issues of audience, theory and theology. They also bring the chronological focus back to the centuries before 1100. All are excellent. The contribution by Kahsnitz (also previously published in German) offers an elegant account of the Ottonian crucifixes’ theological and art-historical backstory. Beatrice Kitzinger’s erudite meditation on the complexities of the cross-crucifix relationship — in both the Middle Ages and modern scholarship — is especially impressive. It leads neatly to an enjoyable epilogue by Jacqueline Jung, in which she reminds us of the inherent and abiding ‘strangeness’ of the crucifixion image and brings the medieval image into a more direct cultural conversation with the present day. In their Introduction, the volume’s editors explain that in bringing these essays together they hope ‘to introduce the Boston Crucifix to new audiences and raise its profile among specialists, and also to provide a forum for fresh research on the emergence of large-scale images of Christ on the cross’ (p. 15). This fine and thoughtful collection — perhaps more properly described as bilateral than truly international — undoubtedly succeeds in these central aims, and it does so with some style. To the extent that this is a study of developments in large-scale Ottonian and Salian wooden crucifixion sculpture, it is a very good one. As a collection, the coverage of material from after 1100 or much beyond the German lands is less coherent. The Crucifixion image’s intellectual, devotional, architectural and art-historical contexts change significantly through the 12th century and the number and variety of surviving examples increase considerably. The collection’s lacunae here — both in terms of object domain and engagement with relevant scholarship — are the weak point of an otherwise admirable volume.","PeriodicalId":42723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the British Archaeological Association","volume":"175 1","pages":"312 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Norman Sicily: Material Culture and Society\",\"authors\":\"J. McNeill\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00681288.2022.2118410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"easily struggles to convince against the more compelling conclusions of Manuela Beer’s masterclass in visual analysis. A second submission by Klaus Endemann (previously published in German) constitutes the book’s most substantial single contribution to the general history of the ‘rise of monumental wood sculpture’. Section 3 contains seven individual case studies of medieval crucifixion sculptures. The first four of these relate more or less closely to the Boston Crucifix and include the most celebrated member of the family, the Gero Cross in Cologne. The last three case studies take us beyond the German lands and into the later decades of the 12th century. They are perfectly good essays, but they sit slightly uncomfortably in a collection primarily focused elsewhere. The essays of Section 4 further extend the study’s intellectual horizons to consider issues of audience, theory and theology. They also bring the chronological focus back to the centuries before 1100. All are excellent. The contribution by Kahsnitz (also previously published in German) offers an elegant account of the Ottonian crucifixes’ theological and art-historical backstory. Beatrice Kitzinger’s erudite meditation on the complexities of the cross-crucifix relationship — in both the Middle Ages and modern scholarship — is especially impressive. It leads neatly to an enjoyable epilogue by Jacqueline Jung, in which she reminds us of the inherent and abiding ‘strangeness’ of the crucifixion image and brings the medieval image into a more direct cultural conversation with the present day. In their Introduction, the volume’s editors explain that in bringing these essays together they hope ‘to introduce the Boston Crucifix to new audiences and raise its profile among specialists, and also to provide a forum for fresh research on the emergence of large-scale images of Christ on the cross’ (p. 15). This fine and thoughtful collection — perhaps more properly described as bilateral than truly international — undoubtedly succeeds in these central aims, and it does so with some style. To the extent that this is a study of developments in large-scale Ottonian and Salian wooden crucifixion sculpture, it is a very good one. As a collection, the coverage of material from after 1100 or much beyond the German lands is less coherent. The Crucifixion image’s intellectual, devotional, architectural and art-historical contexts change significantly through the 12th century and the number and variety of surviving examples increase considerably. The collection’s lacunae here — both in terms of object domain and engagement with relevant scholarship — are the weak point of an otherwise admirable volume.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the British Archaeological Association\",\"volume\":\"175 1\",\"pages\":\"312 - 314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the British Archaeological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00681288.2022.2118410\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the British Archaeological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00681288.2022.2118410","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

很容易说服马努埃拉·比尔视觉分析大师班得出的更具说服力的结论。克劳斯·恩德曼(Klaus Endemann)的第二次投稿(之前以德语出版)构成了该书对“纪念性木雕兴起”这一历史的最重要贡献。第3节包含七个中世纪十字架雕塑个案研究。其中前四个或多或少与波士顿十字架有着密切的关系,其中包括家族中最著名的成员,科隆的Gero Cross。最后三个案例研究将我们带到了德国的土地之外,进入了12世纪的后几十年。它们是非常好的散文,但在一本主要集中在其他地方的文集中,它们显得有点不舒服。第4节的文章进一步扩展了研究的知识视野,考虑了受众、理论和神学问题。它们还将时间上的焦点带回了1100年之前的几个世纪。一切都很好。Kahsnitz的贡献(之前也以德语出版)对奥托尼十字架的神学和艺术历史背景进行了优雅的描述。比阿特丽斯·基辛格(Beatrice Kitzinger)在中世纪和现代学术界对十字架关系复杂性的深刻思考尤其令人印象深刻。它巧妙地引出了杰奎琳·荣格(Jacqueline Jung)令人愉快的后记,她在后记中提醒我们十字架图像固有的、持久的“陌生感”,并将中世纪图像带入了与当今更直接的文化对话中。在他们的引言中,该卷的编辑解释说,通过将这些文章汇集在一起,他们希望“向新的观众介绍波士顿十字架,提高其在专家中的知名度,并为对十字架上基督大规模图像的出现进行新的研究提供一个论坛”(第15页)。这一精美而周到的收藏——也许更恰当地描述为双边收藏,而不是真正的国际收藏——无疑成功地实现了这些核心目标,而且它以某种风格做到了这一点。从某种程度上说,这是一个关于大型奥斯曼和萨利亚木制十字架雕塑发展的研究,是一个非常好的研究。作为一个集合,对1100年以后或德国土地以外的材料的报道不太连贯。耶稣受难像的思想、宗教、建筑和艺术历史背景在12世纪发生了重大变化,幸存的例子数量和种类也大幅增加。该系列在对象领域和与相关学术的接触方面都存在缺陷,这是一本令人钦佩的书的弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing Norman Sicily: Material Culture and Society
easily struggles to convince against the more compelling conclusions of Manuela Beer’s masterclass in visual analysis. A second submission by Klaus Endemann (previously published in German) constitutes the book’s most substantial single contribution to the general history of the ‘rise of monumental wood sculpture’. Section 3 contains seven individual case studies of medieval crucifixion sculptures. The first four of these relate more or less closely to the Boston Crucifix and include the most celebrated member of the family, the Gero Cross in Cologne. The last three case studies take us beyond the German lands and into the later decades of the 12th century. They are perfectly good essays, but they sit slightly uncomfortably in a collection primarily focused elsewhere. The essays of Section 4 further extend the study’s intellectual horizons to consider issues of audience, theory and theology. They also bring the chronological focus back to the centuries before 1100. All are excellent. The contribution by Kahsnitz (also previously published in German) offers an elegant account of the Ottonian crucifixes’ theological and art-historical backstory. Beatrice Kitzinger’s erudite meditation on the complexities of the cross-crucifix relationship — in both the Middle Ages and modern scholarship — is especially impressive. It leads neatly to an enjoyable epilogue by Jacqueline Jung, in which she reminds us of the inherent and abiding ‘strangeness’ of the crucifixion image and brings the medieval image into a more direct cultural conversation with the present day. In their Introduction, the volume’s editors explain that in bringing these essays together they hope ‘to introduce the Boston Crucifix to new audiences and raise its profile among specialists, and also to provide a forum for fresh research on the emergence of large-scale images of Christ on the cross’ (p. 15). This fine and thoughtful collection — perhaps more properly described as bilateral than truly international — undoubtedly succeeds in these central aims, and it does so with some style. To the extent that this is a study of developments in large-scale Ottonian and Salian wooden crucifixion sculpture, it is a very good one. As a collection, the coverage of material from after 1100 or much beyond the German lands is less coherent. The Crucifixion image’s intellectual, devotional, architectural and art-historical contexts change significantly through the 12th century and the number and variety of surviving examples increase considerably. The collection’s lacunae here — both in terms of object domain and engagement with relevant scholarship — are the weak point of an otherwise admirable volume.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
The Beautiful Game: Courtly Love Posies in Anglo-Norman Inscribed on Jewellery and Seals Jon Cannon, FSA (8 June 1962–4 May 2023) The Püsterich of Sondershausen: An Explosive Bronze Object between Art, Science and Questions of Human Nature in the 13th Century Early Irish Sculpture and the Art of the High Crosses La coupe de sainte Agnès: France, Espagne, Angleterre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1