不同支架技术对雅思考生写作焦虑的影响:从认知到事实

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning Culture and Social Interaction Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100715
Hamed Abbasi Mojdehi, Abbas Ali Zarei
{"title":"不同支架技术对雅思考生写作焦虑的影响:从认知到事实","authors":"Hamed Abbasi Mojdehi,&nbsp;Abbas Ali Zarei","doi":"10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Writing anxiety is effective on writing performance. Although anxiety is not always an obstacle, controlling its probable damages can facilitate the learning process. The present study investigated the effects of peer, reciprocal, and distributed scaffolding on English as Foreign Language (EFL) learners' anxiety level. 120 IELTS candidates were randomly selected in an IELTS center in Iran. Prior to the course, the participants were interviewed about their perceptions toward anxiety and the ways to reduce it. Then, the participants were randomly placed in one control group and three experimental groups. In each of the experimental groups, one of the aforementioned scaffolding techniques was practiced by a trained IELTS teacher. The Second Language Writing Anxiety Inventory (SLWAI) was administered before and after the treatment, and the results were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance. The findings showed that only the reciprocal scaffolding group had a significant difference with the control group. Also, the use of reciprocal scaffolding had a significant effect only on cognitive anxiety. The qualitative analysis showed a general misperception and a pessimistic view toward the employment of reciprocal and peer scaffolding by the participants. These findings can have implications for all the stake-holders in language learning; especially IELTS test takers, teachers, and language institutes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46850,"journal":{"name":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of different scaffolding techniques on IELTS candidates' writing anxiety: From perceptions to facts\",\"authors\":\"Hamed Abbasi Mojdehi,&nbsp;Abbas Ali Zarei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Writing anxiety is effective on writing performance. Although anxiety is not always an obstacle, controlling its probable damages can facilitate the learning process. The present study investigated the effects of peer, reciprocal, and distributed scaffolding on English as Foreign Language (EFL) learners' anxiety level. 120 IELTS candidates were randomly selected in an IELTS center in Iran. Prior to the course, the participants were interviewed about their perceptions toward anxiety and the ways to reduce it. Then, the participants were randomly placed in one control group and three experimental groups. In each of the experimental groups, one of the aforementioned scaffolding techniques was practiced by a trained IELTS teacher. The Second Language Writing Anxiety Inventory (SLWAI) was administered before and after the treatment, and the results were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance. The findings showed that only the reciprocal scaffolding group had a significant difference with the control group. Also, the use of reciprocal scaffolding had a significant effect only on cognitive anxiety. The qualitative analysis showed a general misperception and a pessimistic view toward the employment of reciprocal and peer scaffolding by the participants. These findings can have implications for all the stake-holders in language learning; especially IELTS test takers, teachers, and language institutes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Culture and Social Interaction\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100715\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Culture and Social Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656123000314\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656123000314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

写作焦虑对写作表现有影响。虽然焦虑并不总是障碍,但控制它可能造成的损害可以促进学习过程。摘要本研究探讨了同伴式、互惠式和分散式脚手架对英语学习者焦虑水平的影响。在伊朗的一个雅思中心随机抽取了120名考生。在课程开始之前,参与者接受了关于他们对焦虑的看法和减少焦虑的方法的采访。然后,参与者被随机分为一个对照组和三个实验组。在每个实验组中,由一位训练有素的雅思老师练习上述脚手架技巧中的一种。治疗前后分别进行第二语言写作焦虑量表(SLWAI),采用协方差分析对结果进行分析。结果显示,只有互惠支架组与对照组有显著差异。此外,互惠脚手架的使用仅对认知焦虑有显著影响。定性分析表明,参与者对互惠和同伴脚手架的使用普遍存在误解和悲观看法。这些发现可以对语言学习的所有利益相关者产生影响;尤其是雅思考生、教师和语言机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of different scaffolding techniques on IELTS candidates' writing anxiety: From perceptions to facts

Writing anxiety is effective on writing performance. Although anxiety is not always an obstacle, controlling its probable damages can facilitate the learning process. The present study investigated the effects of peer, reciprocal, and distributed scaffolding on English as Foreign Language (EFL) learners' anxiety level. 120 IELTS candidates were randomly selected in an IELTS center in Iran. Prior to the course, the participants were interviewed about their perceptions toward anxiety and the ways to reduce it. Then, the participants were randomly placed in one control group and three experimental groups. In each of the experimental groups, one of the aforementioned scaffolding techniques was practiced by a trained IELTS teacher. The Second Language Writing Anxiety Inventory (SLWAI) was administered before and after the treatment, and the results were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance. The findings showed that only the reciprocal scaffolding group had a significant difference with the control group. Also, the use of reciprocal scaffolding had a significant effect only on cognitive anxiety. The qualitative analysis showed a general misperception and a pessimistic view toward the employment of reciprocal and peer scaffolding by the participants. These findings can have implications for all the stake-holders in language learning; especially IELTS test takers, teachers, and language institutes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Culture and Social Interaction
Learning Culture and Social Interaction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
A dynamic systems examination of the impact of peers on educator–infant synchrony within joint attention interactions in an early childhood room Authority and positionings in elementary mathematics: An interactional ethnographic approach Peer interactions in 4/6-month-old infants: From motor development to multimodal communication Egalitarian dialogue and student participation in Learning Communities. The case of the Coquimbo Region, Chile Negotiating agency in teacher-children triads of collaborative (re)storytelling: Empirical study and methodological implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1