海德格尔、阿伦特与思想的毁灭:从《黑色笔记》到《心灵生活》?

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 Arts and Humanities RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/10611967.2021.1973316
Alexei G. Zhavoronkov
{"title":"海德格尔、阿伦特与思想的毁灭:从《黑色笔记》到《心灵生活》?","authors":"Alexei G. Zhavoronkov","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.1973316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is devoted to the issue of Martin Heidegger’s influence on Hannah Arendt as an offshoot of the debates over the Black Notebooks and Heidegger’s attitude toward National Socialism. It centers on a critical analysis of the main arguments of French historian of philosophy Emmanuel Faye, who asserted that Arendt’s views on National Socialism underwent a significant transformation under the influence of Heidegger’s philosophy. I demonstrate the counterproductiveness of Faye’s attempts to apply the most radical arguments from the Heidegger debate to analysis of Arendt’s texts and to inscribe this approach into the broader context of the discussion on race and racism in the works of “classical” philosophers. In the course of my analysis, I also discuss the impact of Faye’s work on contemporary Russian reception of Heidegger’s philosophy and the place his research occupies in contemporary Arendt studies.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"205 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heidegger, Arendt, and the Destruction of Thought: From the Black Notebooks to The Life of the Mind?\",\"authors\":\"Alexei G. Zhavoronkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611967.2021.1973316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article is devoted to the issue of Martin Heidegger’s influence on Hannah Arendt as an offshoot of the debates over the Black Notebooks and Heidegger’s attitude toward National Socialism. It centers on a critical analysis of the main arguments of French historian of philosophy Emmanuel Faye, who asserted that Arendt’s views on National Socialism underwent a significant transformation under the influence of Heidegger’s philosophy. I demonstrate the counterproductiveness of Faye’s attempts to apply the most radical arguments from the Heidegger debate to analysis of Arendt’s texts and to inscribe this approach into the broader context of the discussion on race and racism in the works of “classical” philosophers. In the course of my analysis, I also discuss the impact of Faye’s work on contemporary Russian reception of Heidegger’s philosophy and the place his research occupies in contemporary Arendt studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"205 - 219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.1973316\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.1973316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于探讨马丁·海德格尔对汉娜·阿伦特的影响,这是关于《黑色笔记本》和海德格尔对国家社会主义态度争论的一个分支。本文主要对法国哲学史家伊曼纽尔·法耶的主要论点进行了批判性分析,他断言阿伦特的国家社会主义观在海德格尔哲学的影响下发生了重大转变。我展示了费耶试图将海德格尔辩论中最激进的论点应用于分析阿伦特的文本,并将这种方法纳入“古典”哲学家作品中关于种族和种族主义的讨论的更广泛的背景下,这是适得其反的。在我的分析过程中,我还讨论了费耶的工作对当代俄罗斯人接受海德格尔哲学的影响,以及他的研究在当代阿伦特研究中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heidegger, Arendt, and the Destruction of Thought: From the Black Notebooks to The Life of the Mind?
ABSTRACT This article is devoted to the issue of Martin Heidegger’s influence on Hannah Arendt as an offshoot of the debates over the Black Notebooks and Heidegger’s attitude toward National Socialism. It centers on a critical analysis of the main arguments of French historian of philosophy Emmanuel Faye, who asserted that Arendt’s views on National Socialism underwent a significant transformation under the influence of Heidegger’s philosophy. I demonstrate the counterproductiveness of Faye’s attempts to apply the most radical arguments from the Heidegger debate to analysis of Arendt’s texts and to inscribe this approach into the broader context of the discussion on race and racism in the works of “classical” philosophers. In the course of my analysis, I also discuss the impact of Faye’s work on contemporary Russian reception of Heidegger’s philosophy and the place his research occupies in contemporary Arendt studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.
期刊最新文献
Concluding Russian Studies in Philosophy: An Eye Towards the Future The Concept of Perfection in Lev Karsavin’s Religious Metaphysics Variants of Images of the Future in the Work of Lev P. Karsavin Lev Karsavin: Russian Religiosity and Russian Revolution The Metaphysical Path: Lev P. Karsavin’s Philosophical Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1