转移性肾细胞癌靶向治疗的多学科管理:单一中心的经验

P. Dong, Yang Liu, Zhiling Zhang, Zhiyong Li, Sheng-jie Guo, Zhuo-wei Liu, Li-juan Jiang, H. Han, K. Yao, Yonghong Li, J. Xia, Yun Cao, L. Tian, W. Fan, Liru He, F. Zhou
{"title":"转移性肾细胞癌靶向治疗的多学科管理:单一中心的经验","authors":"P. Dong, Yang Liu, Zhiling Zhang, Zhiyong Li, Sheng-jie Guo, Zhuo-wei Liu, Li-juan Jiang, H. Han, K. Yao, Yonghong Li, J. Xia, Yun Cao, L. Tian, W. Fan, Liru He, F. Zhou","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo report the experience on the multi-disciplinary management of metastatic renal cell (mRCC) patients in a single center. \n \n \nMethods \nData of 168 mRCC patients treated by multi-disciplinary team (MDT) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from December 2007 to February 2019 was retrospectively analyzed.Three treatment groups were identified, including 76 patients with 55 males and 21 females, received anti-angiogenic agents alone (Group A), 66 patients with 55 males and 11 males, received anti-angiogenic agents plus local therapy (Group B)and 26 patients, with 19 males and 7 females, received anti-angiogenic agents plus immunotherapy and local therapy (Group C). The Sunitinib, Sorafenib, Axitinib were chosen for the TKI. The Pembrolizumab was used for immunotherapy. The stereotactic body radiation therapy and surgical excision were considered as the local therapy. The study aims to compare the age, gender, IMDC score, pathology, nbephrectomy, adverse events, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). \n \n \nResults \nOf all patients, the median follow-up duration was 23 months (ranging 6-117 cmonths). The PFS was 18.3 months and median OS was 33.5 months. The 2 years and 5 years survival rate was 66% and 35%, respectively. The median OS of Group A, B and C were 29.8 months, 44.6 months and not reached. 2y-OS was 58%, 67% and 89%, while 5y-OS 12%, 46% and 57%.There was no difference in age, gender, IMDC score, pathology, synchronous metastases or nephterectomy between the three groups. The prognostic result in TKI based combination therapy was superior to TKI therapy alone, which the 5y-OS was 51% and 11%, respectively. The prognostic result in group C's moderate-high risk mRCC patients was superior to group A and B. The median OS in TKI+ DC and CIK+ Pembrolizumab was 49.1 months and 53.1 months. On univariate analyses, IMDC score, nephrectomy and treatment group was associated with OS (P<0.05). On multivariate analyses, treatment group, nephrectomy was associated with OS (P<0.05). The risk of death of Group C decreased about 60% [HR 0.39 (0.17, 0.89), P=0.026]. 78 (46.4%) patients on TKI alone and 16 (61.5%) patients treated with TKI plus immunotherapy had Grade 3 or 4 adverse events. 16 (20.3%) patients had Clavien Ⅲ-Ⅳ toxicity after surgical procedures. 6 (5.7%) patients had Grade 3 toxiciy after SBRT. \n \n \nConclusions \nPatients treated with combined therapy had better survival than those treated with anti-angiogenic agents alone. MDT approach could bring survival benefit to mRCC patients. \n \n \nKey words: \nCarcinoma, renal cell; Metastatic renal cell carcinoma; Anti-angiogenic therapy; Immunotherapy; Local therapy; Multi-disciplinary treatment","PeriodicalId":10343,"journal":{"name":"中华泌尿外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-disciplinary management for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the ear of targeted therapy: a single center experience\",\"authors\":\"P. Dong, Yang Liu, Zhiling Zhang, Zhiyong Li, Sheng-jie Guo, Zhuo-wei Liu, Li-juan Jiang, H. Han, K. Yao, Yonghong Li, J. Xia, Yun Cao, L. Tian, W. Fan, Liru He, F. Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo report the experience on the multi-disciplinary management of metastatic renal cell (mRCC) patients in a single center. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nData of 168 mRCC patients treated by multi-disciplinary team (MDT) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from December 2007 to February 2019 was retrospectively analyzed.Three treatment groups were identified, including 76 patients with 55 males and 21 females, received anti-angiogenic agents alone (Group A), 66 patients with 55 males and 11 males, received anti-angiogenic agents plus local therapy (Group B)and 26 patients, with 19 males and 7 females, received anti-angiogenic agents plus immunotherapy and local therapy (Group C). The Sunitinib, Sorafenib, Axitinib were chosen for the TKI. The Pembrolizumab was used for immunotherapy. The stereotactic body radiation therapy and surgical excision were considered as the local therapy. The study aims to compare the age, gender, IMDC score, pathology, nbephrectomy, adverse events, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). \\n \\n \\nResults \\nOf all patients, the median follow-up duration was 23 months (ranging 6-117 cmonths). The PFS was 18.3 months and median OS was 33.5 months. The 2 years and 5 years survival rate was 66% and 35%, respectively. The median OS of Group A, B and C were 29.8 months, 44.6 months and not reached. 2y-OS was 58%, 67% and 89%, while 5y-OS 12%, 46% and 57%.There was no difference in age, gender, IMDC score, pathology, synchronous metastases or nephterectomy between the three groups. The prognostic result in TKI based combination therapy was superior to TKI therapy alone, which the 5y-OS was 51% and 11%, respectively. The prognostic result in group C's moderate-high risk mRCC patients was superior to group A and B. The median OS in TKI+ DC and CIK+ Pembrolizumab was 49.1 months and 53.1 months. On univariate analyses, IMDC score, nephrectomy and treatment group was associated with OS (P<0.05). On multivariate analyses, treatment group, nephrectomy was associated with OS (P<0.05). The risk of death of Group C decreased about 60% [HR 0.39 (0.17, 0.89), P=0.026]. 78 (46.4%) patients on TKI alone and 16 (61.5%) patients treated with TKI plus immunotherapy had Grade 3 or 4 adverse events. 16 (20.3%) patients had Clavien Ⅲ-Ⅳ toxicity after surgical procedures. 6 (5.7%) patients had Grade 3 toxiciy after SBRT. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nPatients treated with combined therapy had better survival than those treated with anti-angiogenic agents alone. MDT approach could bring survival benefit to mRCC patients. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nCarcinoma, renal cell; Metastatic renal cell carcinoma; Anti-angiogenic therapy; Immunotherapy; Local therapy; Multi-disciplinary treatment\",\"PeriodicalId\":10343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华泌尿外科杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华泌尿外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华泌尿外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的报告单中心多学科治疗转移性肾细胞(mRCC)患者的经验。方法回顾性分析2007年12月至2019年2月在中山大学癌症中心接受多学科团队(MDT)治疗的168例mRCC患者的资料。确定了三个治疗组,包括76名患者,其中55名男性和21名女性,单独接受抗血管生成剂治疗(A组),66名患者,55名男性,11名男性,接受抗血管形成剂加局部治疗(B组),26名患者,19名男性和7名女性,接受抗脉管生成剂加免疫疗法和局部治疗(C组)。选择舒尼替尼、索拉非尼、阿昔替尼进行TKI。Pembrolizumab用于免疫治疗。立体定向放射治疗和手术切除术被认为是局部治疗。本研究旨在比较年龄、性别、IMDC评分、病理学、肿瘤切除术、不良事件、无进展生存率和总生存率(OS)。结果所有患者的中位随访时间为23个月(6-117个月)。PFS为18.3个月,中位OS为33.5个月。2年和5年生存率分别为66%和35%。A组、B组和C组的中位OS分别为29.8个月和44.6个月,均未达到。2y OS为58%、67%和89%,5y OS为12%、46%和57%。三组之间在年龄、性别、IMDC评分、病理、同步转移或肾切除术方面没有差异。基于TKI的联合治疗的预后结果优于单独的TKI治疗,5y OS分别为51%和11%。C组中高风险mRCC患者的预后结果优于A组和B组。TKI+DC和CIK+Pembrolizumab的中位OS分别为49.1个月和53.1个月。单因素分析显示,IMDC评分、肾切除术和治疗组与OS相关(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示治疗组、肾切除术与OS有关(P<0.05),C组死亡风险降低约60%[HR 0.39(0.17,0.89),P=0.026]。78名(46.4%)患者单独接受TKI治疗,16名(61.5%)患者接受TKI联合免疫治疗,出现3级或4级不良事件。术后ClavienⅢ-Ⅳ中毒16例(20.3%)。6例(5.7%)患者SBRT后出现3级毒性反应。结论联合治疗患者的生存率高于单独使用抗血管生成药物的患者。MDT方法可为mRCC患者带来生存益处。关键词:癌,肾细胞;转移性肾细胞癌;抗血管生成治疗;免疫治疗;局部治疗;多学科治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-disciplinary management for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the ear of targeted therapy: a single center experience
Objective To report the experience on the multi-disciplinary management of metastatic renal cell (mRCC) patients in a single center. Methods Data of 168 mRCC patients treated by multi-disciplinary team (MDT) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from December 2007 to February 2019 was retrospectively analyzed.Three treatment groups were identified, including 76 patients with 55 males and 21 females, received anti-angiogenic agents alone (Group A), 66 patients with 55 males and 11 males, received anti-angiogenic agents plus local therapy (Group B)and 26 patients, with 19 males and 7 females, received anti-angiogenic agents plus immunotherapy and local therapy (Group C). The Sunitinib, Sorafenib, Axitinib were chosen for the TKI. The Pembrolizumab was used for immunotherapy. The stereotactic body radiation therapy and surgical excision were considered as the local therapy. The study aims to compare the age, gender, IMDC score, pathology, nbephrectomy, adverse events, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Results Of all patients, the median follow-up duration was 23 months (ranging 6-117 cmonths). The PFS was 18.3 months and median OS was 33.5 months. The 2 years and 5 years survival rate was 66% and 35%, respectively. The median OS of Group A, B and C were 29.8 months, 44.6 months and not reached. 2y-OS was 58%, 67% and 89%, while 5y-OS 12%, 46% and 57%.There was no difference in age, gender, IMDC score, pathology, synchronous metastases or nephterectomy between the three groups. The prognostic result in TKI based combination therapy was superior to TKI therapy alone, which the 5y-OS was 51% and 11%, respectively. The prognostic result in group C's moderate-high risk mRCC patients was superior to group A and B. The median OS in TKI+ DC and CIK+ Pembrolizumab was 49.1 months and 53.1 months. On univariate analyses, IMDC score, nephrectomy and treatment group was associated with OS (P<0.05). On multivariate analyses, treatment group, nephrectomy was associated with OS (P<0.05). The risk of death of Group C decreased about 60% [HR 0.39 (0.17, 0.89), P=0.026]. 78 (46.4%) patients on TKI alone and 16 (61.5%) patients treated with TKI plus immunotherapy had Grade 3 or 4 adverse events. 16 (20.3%) patients had Clavien Ⅲ-Ⅳ toxicity after surgical procedures. 6 (5.7%) patients had Grade 3 toxiciy after SBRT. Conclusions Patients treated with combined therapy had better survival than those treated with anti-angiogenic agents alone. MDT approach could bring survival benefit to mRCC patients. Key words: Carcinoma, renal cell; Metastatic renal cell carcinoma; Anti-angiogenic therapy; Immunotherapy; Local therapy; Multi-disciplinary treatment
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华泌尿外科杂志
中华泌尿外科杂志 Medicine-Nephrology
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14180
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Urology (monthly) was founded in 1980. It is a publicly issued academic journal supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and comments in this field. This journal mainly reports on the latest scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the professional field of urology at home and abroad, as well as basic theoretical research results closely related to clinical practice. The journal has columns such as treatises, abstracts of treatises, experimental studies, case reports, experience exchanges, reviews, reviews, lectures, etc. Chinese Journal of Urology has been included in well-known databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Chinese Science Citation Database Source Journal (including extended version), and also included in American Chemical Abstracts (CA). The journal has been rated as a quality journal by the Association for Science and Technology and as an excellent journal by the Chinese Medical Association.
期刊最新文献
Clinical application of different bladder neck separation techniques in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Analysis of risk factors for acute kidney injury after radical nephrectomy Characteristics of urinary microflora in women with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy without lower urinary tract symptoms A case report of primary leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord Establishment and validation of nomogram for positive surgical margin of prostate cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1