颈动脉支架植入术前对严重颈动脉狭窄患者进行远程缺血预处理的安全性和有效性:一项概念验证、随机对照试验

IF 0.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Current Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2022-04-04 DOI:10.18502/cjn.v21i2.10495
Maedeh Asadi, Etrat Hooshmandi, Fatemeh Emaminia, Hanieh Mardani, Ali Mohammad Keshtvarz-Hesamabadi, M. Rismanchi, Abbas Rahimi-Jaberi, V. Ostovan, Nima Fadakar, A. Borhani-Haghighi
{"title":"颈动脉支架植入术前对严重颈动脉狭窄患者进行远程缺血预处理的安全性和有效性:一项概念验证、随机对照试验","authors":"Maedeh Asadi, Etrat Hooshmandi, Fatemeh Emaminia, Hanieh Mardani, Ali Mohammad Keshtvarz-Hesamabadi, M. Rismanchi, Abbas Rahimi-Jaberi, V. Ostovan, Nima Fadakar, A. Borhani-Haghighi","doi":"10.18502/cjn.v21i2.10495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been proposed as a possible potential treatment for ischemic stroke. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of micro-embolic brain infarcts after RIPC in patients with stroke who underwent elective carotid artery stenting (CAS) treatment. Methods: This study was managed at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in southwest Iran. Patients undergoing CAS were randomly allocated into RIPC and control groups. Patients in the RIPC group received three intermittent cycles of 5-minute arm ischemia followed by reperfusion using manual blood cuff inflation/deflation less than 30 minutes before CAS treatment. Afterward, stenting surgery was conducted. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), was acquired within the first 24 hours after CAS. Results: Seventy-four patients were recruited (79.7% men, age: 72.30 ± 8.57). Both groups of RIPC and control had no significant difference in baseline parameters (P > 0.05). Fifteen patients (40.5%) in the RIPC group and 19 (54.1%) patients in the control group developed restricted lesions in DWI MRI. In DWI+ patients, there were no significant differences according to the number of lesions, lesion surface area, largest lesion diameter, cortical infarcts percent, and ipsilateral and bilateral infarcts between the two groups. Conclusion: Although RIPC is a safe and non-invasive modality before CAS to decrease infarcts, this study did not show the advantage of RIPC in the prevention of infarcts following CAS. It may be because of the small sample size.","PeriodicalId":40077,"journal":{"name":"Current Journal of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of remote ischemic preconditioning in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis before carotid artery stenting: A proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Maedeh Asadi, Etrat Hooshmandi, Fatemeh Emaminia, Hanieh Mardani, Ali Mohammad Keshtvarz-Hesamabadi, M. Rismanchi, Abbas Rahimi-Jaberi, V. Ostovan, Nima Fadakar, A. Borhani-Haghighi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/cjn.v21i2.10495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been proposed as a possible potential treatment for ischemic stroke. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of micro-embolic brain infarcts after RIPC in patients with stroke who underwent elective carotid artery stenting (CAS) treatment. Methods: This study was managed at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in southwest Iran. Patients undergoing CAS were randomly allocated into RIPC and control groups. Patients in the RIPC group received three intermittent cycles of 5-minute arm ischemia followed by reperfusion using manual blood cuff inflation/deflation less than 30 minutes before CAS treatment. Afterward, stenting surgery was conducted. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), was acquired within the first 24 hours after CAS. Results: Seventy-four patients were recruited (79.7% men, age: 72.30 ± 8.57). Both groups of RIPC and control had no significant difference in baseline parameters (P > 0.05). Fifteen patients (40.5%) in the RIPC group and 19 (54.1%) patients in the control group developed restricted lesions in DWI MRI. In DWI+ patients, there were no significant differences according to the number of lesions, lesion surface area, largest lesion diameter, cortical infarcts percent, and ipsilateral and bilateral infarcts between the two groups. Conclusion: Although RIPC is a safe and non-invasive modality before CAS to decrease infarcts, this study did not show the advantage of RIPC in the prevention of infarcts following CAS. It may be because of the small sample size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v21i2.10495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v21i2.10495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远程缺血预处理(RIPC)被认为是缺血性脑卒中可能的潜在治疗方法。本研究旨在调查卒中患者择期颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后RIPC后微栓塞性脑梗死的频率。方法:本研究在伊朗西南部设拉子医科大学进行。接受CAS治疗的患者随机分为RIPC组和对照组。RIPC组患者在CAS治疗前不到30分钟,接受3个间歇周期,5分钟手臂缺血,然后使用手动血袖带充气/放气进行再灌注。随后进行支架手术。磁共振成像(MRI),包括弥散加权成像(DWI)和表观扩散系数(ADC),在CAS后的前24小时内进行。结果:共纳入74例患者,其中男性79.7%,年龄72.30±8.57岁。两组与对照组基线参数差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。RIPC组15例(40.5%)和对照组19例(54.1%)患者在DWI MRI上出现局限性病变。在DWI+患者中,两组在病灶数量、病灶表面积、最大病灶直径、皮质梗死百分比、同侧及双侧梗死情况均无显著差异。结论:尽管RIPC是一种安全且无创的减少梗死的方法,但本研究并未显示RIPC在预防CAS后梗死方面的优势。这可能是因为样本量小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and efficacy of remote ischemic preconditioning in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis before carotid artery stenting: A proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial
Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been proposed as a possible potential treatment for ischemic stroke. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of micro-embolic brain infarcts after RIPC in patients with stroke who underwent elective carotid artery stenting (CAS) treatment. Methods: This study was managed at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in southwest Iran. Patients undergoing CAS were randomly allocated into RIPC and control groups. Patients in the RIPC group received three intermittent cycles of 5-minute arm ischemia followed by reperfusion using manual blood cuff inflation/deflation less than 30 minutes before CAS treatment. Afterward, stenting surgery was conducted. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), was acquired within the first 24 hours after CAS. Results: Seventy-four patients were recruited (79.7% men, age: 72.30 ± 8.57). Both groups of RIPC and control had no significant difference in baseline parameters (P > 0.05). Fifteen patients (40.5%) in the RIPC group and 19 (54.1%) patients in the control group developed restricted lesions in DWI MRI. In DWI+ patients, there were no significant differences according to the number of lesions, lesion surface area, largest lesion diameter, cortical infarcts percent, and ipsilateral and bilateral infarcts between the two groups. Conclusion: Although RIPC is a safe and non-invasive modality before CAS to decrease infarcts, this study did not show the advantage of RIPC in the prevention of infarcts following CAS. It may be because of the small sample size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Journal of Neurology
Current Journal of Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sequential changes in expression of long non-coding RNAs THRIL and MALAT1 after ischemic stroke. Tinnitus and reduced word recognition with a bilateral inferior colliculus infarction after cerebellar arteriovenous malformation embolization. Validity and reliability of the Iranian-developed version of the leisure questionnaire for people with multiple sclerosis: Psychometric properties. A study on possible risk factors for progressive supranuclear palsy in southern part of India. Anticoagulation in the management of septic cavernous sinus thrombosis secondary to rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis: A retrospective real-world experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1