当民族主义与民粹主义相遇:审视2014年和2019年欧洲议会选举中的右翼民粹主义和民族主义话语

Q1 Social Sciences European Politics and Society Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI:10.1080/23745118.2021.1994809
Patricia Rodi, L. Karavasilis, Leonardo Puleo
{"title":"当民族主义与民粹主义相遇:审视2014年和2019年欧洲议会选举中的右翼民粹主义和民族主义话语","authors":"Patricia Rodi, L. Karavasilis, Leonardo Puleo","doi":"10.1080/23745118.2021.1994809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article provides an empirical contribution into the discursive repertoire of seven populist radical right-wing parties. Within the context of the European Parliamentary elections of 2014 and 2019, we examine and compare how these parties discursively shape the content of social demands by assessing how ‘the people’, ‘the nation’, ‘the elite’ and ‘others’ are constructed, and how different demands are incorporated. In doing so we assess the specific role of populism and nationalism in these parties’ discourse. We apply a two-stage measurement technique, combining both qualitative and quantitative content analytical modes of research, with advantages over existing methods, looking at both levels and form of the populist and nationalist signifiers. Our results suggest that although parties often combine both populism and nationalism, there is a general disposition to construct the signifer ‘the people’, not primarily through staging an antagonism between ‘people/elite’ (populism), but rather through articulating ‘the people’ as a national community in need of protection from the EU (nationalism). In view of this, we highlight that populism does not operate as the differentia specifica of populist radical right wing parties’ discourse.","PeriodicalId":53479,"journal":{"name":"European Politics and Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"284 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When nationalism meets populism: examining right-wing populist & nationalist discourses in the 2014 & 2019 European parliamentary elections\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Rodi, L. Karavasilis, Leonardo Puleo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23745118.2021.1994809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article provides an empirical contribution into the discursive repertoire of seven populist radical right-wing parties. Within the context of the European Parliamentary elections of 2014 and 2019, we examine and compare how these parties discursively shape the content of social demands by assessing how ‘the people’, ‘the nation’, ‘the elite’ and ‘others’ are constructed, and how different demands are incorporated. In doing so we assess the specific role of populism and nationalism in these parties’ discourse. We apply a two-stage measurement technique, combining both qualitative and quantitative content analytical modes of research, with advantages over existing methods, looking at both levels and form of the populist and nationalist signifiers. Our results suggest that although parties often combine both populism and nationalism, there is a general disposition to construct the signifer ‘the people’, not primarily through staging an antagonism between ‘people/elite’ (populism), but rather through articulating ‘the people’ as a national community in need of protection from the EU (nationalism). In view of this, we highlight that populism does not operate as the differentia specifica of populist radical right wing parties’ discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Politics and Society\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"284 - 302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Politics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1994809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Politics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1994809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文对七个民粹主义激进右翼政党的话语库进行了实证研究。在2014年和2019年欧洲议会选举的背景下,我们通过评估“人民”、“国家”、“精英”和“他人”是如何构建的,以及不同的需求是如何融合的,来研究和比较这些政党如何随意塑造社会需求的内容。在这样做的过程中,我们评估了民粹主义和民族主义在这些政党话语中的具体作用。我们采用了两阶段测量技术,结合了定性和定量的内容分析研究模式,与现有方法相比具有优势,同时考察了民粹主义和民族主义能指的水平和形式。我们的研究结果表明,尽管政党经常将民粹主义和民族主义结合在一起,但人们普遍倾向于构建“人民”的标志,而不是主要通过在“人民/精英”之间进行对抗(民粹主义),而是通过将“人民”阐明为一个需要免受欧盟保护的民族共同体(民族主义)。有鉴于此,我们强调民粹主义并不是民粹主义激进右翼政党话语的差异化特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When nationalism meets populism: examining right-wing populist & nationalist discourses in the 2014 & 2019 European parliamentary elections
ABSTRACT This article provides an empirical contribution into the discursive repertoire of seven populist radical right-wing parties. Within the context of the European Parliamentary elections of 2014 and 2019, we examine and compare how these parties discursively shape the content of social demands by assessing how ‘the people’, ‘the nation’, ‘the elite’ and ‘others’ are constructed, and how different demands are incorporated. In doing so we assess the specific role of populism and nationalism in these parties’ discourse. We apply a two-stage measurement technique, combining both qualitative and quantitative content analytical modes of research, with advantages over existing methods, looking at both levels and form of the populist and nationalist signifiers. Our results suggest that although parties often combine both populism and nationalism, there is a general disposition to construct the signifer ‘the people’, not primarily through staging an antagonism between ‘people/elite’ (populism), but rather through articulating ‘the people’ as a national community in need of protection from the EU (nationalism). In view of this, we highlight that populism does not operate as the differentia specifica of populist radical right wing parties’ discourse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Politics and Society
European Politics and Society Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The editors of European Politics and Society welcome the submission of high quality articles on all aspects of European Politics, widely defined to include, comparative politics, political sociology, social policy, international relations, security, and modern history. The geographical scope of the journal covers all parts of Europe including the Russian Federation. The Journal also welcomes proposals for special thematic issues. For further guidelines on submission of special issue proposals, please see the Instructions for Authors page. All articles will be subject to a rigorous double-blind peer review process by a minimum of two referees.
期刊最新文献
Discovering neighbors: the regional migration experience as a source of intergroup contact Why do business leaders, senior politicians and civil servants move to leading positions in EU civil society? Exploring capital gains through boundary crossing Challenged by postmaterialism: left-wing parties in postcommunist Europe Political realignment in Western Europe in the twenty-first century: eroding satisfaction and trust in democracy and its institutions? Individual sources of support for the EU and transnational cleavage beliefs: assessing the relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1