助产士和护生对身体隐私和自尊的认知。土耳其案例

IF 0.5 4区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS Acta Bioethica Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.4067/s1726-569x2021000200259
Gün Mukadder, Aslantekin Özçoban Filiz
{"title":"助产士和护生对身体隐私和自尊的认知。土耳其案例","authors":"Gün Mukadder, Aslantekin Özçoban Filiz","doi":"10.4067/s1726-569x2021000200259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstrac t: The article reports the results of a study conducted to examine midwifery and nursing students’ perceptions of body intimacy and the factors affecting their perceptions. This was a cross-sectional study, with 389 midwifery and nursing students at a public university volunteering to participate in the study. Data were collected using a “Personal Information Form”, the “Body Confidentiality Scale for Obstetrics and Gynecology” and the “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale”. The participants had a mean age of 20.89 ± 1.86 years. The mean score they gave to the question whether they paid attention to privacy was 8.21 ±1.88. The mean Rosenberg self-esteem score was 29.44 ± 4.83 (minimum = 10, maximum = 40). The mean overall privacy score was 36.10 ± 6.84 (min = 9, max = 45), rights and privacy was 20.80 ± 3.71 (min = 5, max = 25), ethics and privacy was 20.45 ± 3.67 (min = 5, max = 25), and clinical privacy was 75.22 ± 12.33 (min = 18, max = 90). According to the results, obstetrics and nursing students, who would later intervene in women’s health, had higher than average self-esteem and perception of privacy. Nevertheless, the establishment of the concept of “privacy” is an issue that should be addressed and reinforced in the training of obstetrics and nursing students who will provide services in such a sensitive field as gynecology and obstetrics.","PeriodicalId":29643,"journal":{"name":"Acta Bioethica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midwife and Nurse Students’ Perceptions of Body Privacy and Self Esteem. The Case of Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Gün Mukadder, Aslantekin Özçoban Filiz\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s1726-569x2021000200259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstrac t: The article reports the results of a study conducted to examine midwifery and nursing students’ perceptions of body intimacy and the factors affecting their perceptions. This was a cross-sectional study, with 389 midwifery and nursing students at a public university volunteering to participate in the study. Data were collected using a “Personal Information Form”, the “Body Confidentiality Scale for Obstetrics and Gynecology” and the “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale”. The participants had a mean age of 20.89 ± 1.86 years. The mean score they gave to the question whether they paid attention to privacy was 8.21 ±1.88. The mean Rosenberg self-esteem score was 29.44 ± 4.83 (minimum = 10, maximum = 40). The mean overall privacy score was 36.10 ± 6.84 (min = 9, max = 45), rights and privacy was 20.80 ± 3.71 (min = 5, max = 25), ethics and privacy was 20.45 ± 3.67 (min = 5, max = 25), and clinical privacy was 75.22 ± 12.33 (min = 18, max = 90). According to the results, obstetrics and nursing students, who would later intervene in women’s health, had higher than average self-esteem and perception of privacy. Nevertheless, the establishment of the concept of “privacy” is an issue that should be addressed and reinforced in the training of obstetrics and nursing students who will provide services in such a sensitive field as gynecology and obstetrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Bioethica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Bioethica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s1726-569x2021000200259\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Bioethica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s1726-569x2021000200259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要/ abstract摘要:本研究旨在调查助产与护理专业学生对身体亲密关系的认知及其影响因素。这是一项横断面研究,一所公立大学的389名助产学和护理学学生自愿参加了这项研究。数据采用“个人信息表”、“妇产科身体保密量表”和“Rosenberg自尊量表”收集。参与者的平均年龄为20.89±1.86岁。在“是否注意隐私”一题中,平均得分为8.21±1.88分。平均Rosenberg自尊得分为29.44±4.83(最小值为10,最大值为40)。平均总体隐私得分为36.10±6.84分(min = 9, max = 45),权利与隐私得分为20.80±3.71分(min = 5, max = 25),道德与隐私得分为20.45±3.67分(min = 5, max = 25),临床隐私得分为75.22±12.33分(min = 18, max = 90)。结果显示,产科和护理专业的学生,后来会干预妇女的健康,有高于平均水平的自尊和对隐私的感知。然而,“隐私”概念的确立是产科和护理专业学生在妇产科等敏感领域提供服务的培训中应该解决和加强的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Midwife and Nurse Students’ Perceptions of Body Privacy and Self Esteem. The Case of Turkey
Abstrac t: The article reports the results of a study conducted to examine midwifery and nursing students’ perceptions of body intimacy and the factors affecting their perceptions. This was a cross-sectional study, with 389 midwifery and nursing students at a public university volunteering to participate in the study. Data were collected using a “Personal Information Form”, the “Body Confidentiality Scale for Obstetrics and Gynecology” and the “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale”. The participants had a mean age of 20.89 ± 1.86 years. The mean score they gave to the question whether they paid attention to privacy was 8.21 ±1.88. The mean Rosenberg self-esteem score was 29.44 ± 4.83 (minimum = 10, maximum = 40). The mean overall privacy score was 36.10 ± 6.84 (min = 9, max = 45), rights and privacy was 20.80 ± 3.71 (min = 5, max = 25), ethics and privacy was 20.45 ± 3.67 (min = 5, max = 25), and clinical privacy was 75.22 ± 12.33 (min = 18, max = 90). According to the results, obstetrics and nursing students, who would later intervene in women’s health, had higher than average self-esteem and perception of privacy. Nevertheless, the establishment of the concept of “privacy” is an issue that should be addressed and reinforced in the training of obstetrics and nursing students who will provide services in such a sensitive field as gynecology and obstetrics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Bioethica
Acta Bioethica Bioethical Issues-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Bioethica is a biannual publication by the Interdisciplinary Center for Studies in Bioethics of the University of Chile (ISSN 0717-5906, press edition, y 1726-569-X, electronic edition), which publishes in three languages: Spanish, English and Portuguese. Indexed in Science Citation Index (SCI), Scopus, Lilacs, SciELO y Latindex, and in database from several Institutions; it constitutes a pluralistic source of perspectives and an important tribune which accepts the contributions of authors compromised with the interdisciplinary study of ethical determinants and consequences of techno scientific research.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between covid-19 burnout and the moral sensitivity of healthcare professionals Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Legal, Ethical and Social Aspects Complaints against Physicians in Minas Gerais, Brazil A autonomia do adolescente em relação ao direto de imunização contra infecções sexualmente transmissíveis: revisão bibliográfica Abordagem epidemiológica e considerações bioéticas sobre a infecção pelo vírus da hepatite b em crianças e adolescentes no estado do acre, Brasil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1