个人规则和研究技巧:人类学学派的研究还有可能吗?

Lise Lundh
{"title":"个人规则和研究技巧:人类学学派的研究还有可能吗?","authors":"Lise Lundh","doi":"10.18261/issn.1504-2898-2020-03-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article draws on experiences from generating data for a PhD. During the period of fieldwork in a Norwegian school, new regulations based on EU’s General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) were implemented. With refer-ence to similar experiences from various Norwegian anthropologists, the article argues that the new regulations mar-ginalise ethnographic work even further. I suggest that an overall positivistic notion of research data might lie behind this, and I argue that a consequence could be that we simultaneously lose ways to perceive and understand silent knowledge and backstage knowledge. Furthermore, I argue that, in some cases, fulfilling the demand for documen-tation might inflict harm on people whom the regulations are intended to protect.","PeriodicalId":38612,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Antropologisk Tidsskrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personvernregler og forskningsetikk: Blir det fortsatt mulig å gjøre antropologisk skoleforskning?\",\"authors\":\"Lise Lundh\",\"doi\":\"10.18261/issn.1504-2898-2020-03-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article draws on experiences from generating data for a PhD. During the period of fieldwork in a Norwegian school, new regulations based on EU’s General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) were implemented. With refer-ence to similar experiences from various Norwegian anthropologists, the article argues that the new regulations mar-ginalise ethnographic work even further. I suggest that an overall positivistic notion of research data might lie behind this, and I argue that a consequence could be that we simultaneously lose ways to perceive and understand silent knowledge and backstage knowledge. Furthermore, I argue that, in some cases, fulfilling the demand for documen-tation might inflict harm on people whom the regulations are intended to protect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Norsk Antropologisk Tidsskrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Norsk Antropologisk Tidsskrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2898-2020-03-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norsk Antropologisk Tidsskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2898-2020-03-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章借鉴了为博士生生成数据的经验。在挪威一所学校的实地考察期间,实施了基于欧盟《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)的新规定。本文参考了挪威各人类学家的类似经验,认为新规定对民族志工作的进一步规范化。我认为,这背后可能有一个对研究数据的整体实证主义概念,我认为其后果可能是我们同时失去了感知和理解沉默知识和后台知识的方法。此外,我认为,在某些情况下,满足文件要求可能会对法规旨在保护的人造成伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personvernregler og forskningsetikk: Blir det fortsatt mulig å gjøre antropologisk skoleforskning?
The article draws on experiences from generating data for a PhD. During the period of fieldwork in a Norwegian school, new regulations based on EU’s General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) were implemented. With refer-ence to similar experiences from various Norwegian anthropologists, the article argues that the new regulations mar-ginalise ethnographic work even further. I suggest that an overall positivistic notion of research data might lie behind this, and I argue that a consequence could be that we simultaneously lose ways to perceive and understand silent knowledge and backstage knowledge. Furthermore, I argue that, in some cases, fulfilling the demand for documen-tation might inflict harm on people whom the regulations are intended to protect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Norsk Antropologisk Tidsskrift
Norsk Antropologisk Tidsskrift Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Åpen forskning og antropologiens status som FAIR Etikk ved Sosialantropologisk institutt, UiO Etnografisk multimediearkiv og GDPR Etisk og metodisk bevissthet – En refleksjon over det etnografiske handlingsrom Ola Gunhildrud Berta og Tone Nergård Høgblad: Helt nært. En innføring i etnografisk metodeOsloUniversitetsforlaget2023978-82-15-02958-0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1