S. Christensen, A. Buch
{"title":"Dannelse og ingeniørfaglighed","authors":"S. Christensen, A. Buch","doi":"10.7146/tfp.v18i35.134056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International interdisciplinary research on engineering education and practice (Christensen et al., 2007, 2009, 2019, and 2022 forthcoming) points to the fact, that the engineer’s understanding of the ‘social’ is underprioritized and discursively enacted as soft versus hard technical disciplines. As a result, it has often contributed to a cultural impoverishment of our lifeworld. Hence there is a need for a Bildung perspective in engineering degree programs. A perspective taking its point of departure in the democratic, cultural, and human challenges of society. The discourse on Bildung has primarily taken place in relation to the pedagogical professions, whereas the engineering profession has often been overlooked. In this contribution we make up for this by considering a contribution with potential for supplying a concept of Bildung suitable for the engineering profession and engineering degree programs. The article brings forth the social and ethical responsibility embedded in engineering work in democratic societies and calls to mind John Dewey´s democratic understanding of Bildung (Dewey, 2011 [1916]). The article projects, how this understanding of Bildung might offer an opportunity for rethinking engineering and engineering activity capable of contributing to democratic and responsible resolutions of societal challenges. ","PeriodicalId":32373,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/tfp.v18i35.134056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于工程教育和实践的国际跨学科研究(Christensen等人,2007年、2009年、2019年和2022年即将出版)指出,工程师对“社会”的理解被低估,并被视为软技术学科与硬技术学科。因此,它经常导致我们生活世界的文化贫困。因此,在工程学位课程中需要一个Bildung视角。从社会的民主、文化和人类挑战出发的观点。关于Bildung的讨论主要与教育专业有关,而工程专业经常被忽视。在这一贡献中,我们通过考虑一项有潜力为工程专业和工程学位课程提供Bildung概念的贡献来弥补这一点。本文提出了民主社会中工程工作所包含的社会和伦理责任,并唤起了约翰·杜威对毕登的民主理解(杜威,2011[1916])。这篇文章预测,这种对Bildung的理解可能会为重新思考工程和工程活动提供机会,从而有助于民主和负责任地解决社会挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dannelse og ingeniørfaglighed
International interdisciplinary research on engineering education and practice (Christensen et al., 2007, 2009, 2019, and 2022 forthcoming) points to the fact, that the engineer’s understanding of the ‘social’ is underprioritized and discursively enacted as soft versus hard technical disciplines. As a result, it has often contributed to a cultural impoverishment of our lifeworld. Hence there is a need for a Bildung perspective in engineering degree programs. A perspective taking its point of departure in the democratic, cultural, and human challenges of society. The discourse on Bildung has primarily taken place in relation to the pedagogical professions, whereas the engineering profession has often been overlooked. In this contribution we make up for this by considering a contribution with potential for supplying a concept of Bildung suitable for the engineering profession and engineering degree programs. The article brings forth the social and ethical responsibility embedded in engineering work in democratic societies and calls to mind John Dewey´s democratic understanding of Bildung (Dewey, 2011 [1916]). The article projects, how this understanding of Bildung might offer an opportunity for rethinking engineering and engineering activity capable of contributing to democratic and responsible resolutions of societal challenges. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lege- og børnekulturer i praksis Professionsidentitet blandt ergoterapeutstuderende Janne Østergaard Hagelquist: Mentalisering i mødet med udsatte børn Sanne Faber, Andreas Kopp og Kirsten Lauta: Det meningsfulde historiefag Frivilliges samarbejde med medarbejdere i kirken - med hvilket engagement?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1