{"title":"公众利益，认可，以及同样的唯物主义结论:一篇抒情文章","authors":"E. Segal","doi":"10.1080/10428232.2018.1525237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this lyric essay, the author uses auto-ethnographic inquiry to re-contextualize a qualitative study of Latina parents’ experiences of safety net services, benefits, and programs. That study concluded that at the heart of service use was ambivalence about dependency; at the heart of ambivalence about dependency was the desire for recognition. The purpose of this article is to express and explore that finding intersectionally, i.e. in the context of gender, race, and class. The author deliberately avoids narrative coherence, yet relies on Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition as an orienting framework.","PeriodicalId":44255,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10428232.2018.1525237","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public benefits, recognition, and the same old materialist conclusion: a lyric essay\",\"authors\":\"E. Segal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428232.2018.1525237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this lyric essay, the author uses auto-ethnographic inquiry to re-contextualize a qualitative study of Latina parents’ experiences of safety net services, benefits, and programs. That study concluded that at the heart of service use was ambivalence about dependency; at the heart of ambivalence about dependency was the desire for recognition. The purpose of this article is to express and explore that finding intersectionally, i.e. in the context of gender, race, and class. The author deliberately avoids narrative coherence, yet relies on Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition as an orienting framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Progressive Human Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10428232.2018.1525237\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Progressive Human Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2018.1525237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2018.1525237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
Public benefits, recognition, and the same old materialist conclusion: a lyric essay
ABSTRACT In this lyric essay, the author uses auto-ethnographic inquiry to re-contextualize a qualitative study of Latina parents’ experiences of safety net services, benefits, and programs. That study concluded that at the heart of service use was ambivalence about dependency; at the heart of ambivalence about dependency was the desire for recognition. The purpose of this article is to express and explore that finding intersectionally, i.e. in the context of gender, race, and class. The author deliberately avoids narrative coherence, yet relies on Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition as an orienting framework.
期刊介绍：
The only journal of its kind in the United States, the Journal of Progressive Human Services covers political, social, personal, and professional problems in human services from a progressive perspective. The journal stimulates debate about major social issues and contributes to the development of the analytical tools needed for building a caring society based on equality and justice. The journal"s contributors examine oppressed and vulnerable groups, struggles by workers and clients on the job and in the community, dilemmas of practice in conservative contexts, and strategies for ending racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, and discrimination of persons who are disabled and psychologically distressed.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
