{"title":"帝国的工具?","authors":"C. Newland","doi":"10.1080/03090728.2022.2121461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This piece problematises Daniel Headrick’s 1981 work on 19th-century telegraphy: Tools of Empire. Instead of viewing the telegraph as a neat Imperial tool, this piece deconstructs the cables into its messy constituent parts, teasing out the international landscapes of people and materials linked by them. We move from the colonial copper-smelters in Chile to the indigenous gutta-percha collectors of Sarawak; from the peasant tar-burners of rural Sweden to the turpentine workers trapped in camps in the postbellum American south; from the partying jute-growers of Bangladesh to the roaming cable engineers on the Indian Ocean. This piece uncovers the people, the struggles, the indigenous knowledge and the hidden work that went into a key piece of 19th-century technology.","PeriodicalId":42635,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Archaeology Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"80 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Tools of Empire?\",\"authors\":\"C. Newland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03090728.2022.2121461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This piece problematises Daniel Headrick’s 1981 work on 19th-century telegraphy: Tools of Empire. Instead of viewing the telegraph as a neat Imperial tool, this piece deconstructs the cables into its messy constituent parts, teasing out the international landscapes of people and materials linked by them. We move from the colonial copper-smelters in Chile to the indigenous gutta-percha collectors of Sarawak; from the peasant tar-burners of rural Sweden to the turpentine workers trapped in camps in the postbellum American south; from the partying jute-growers of Bangladesh to the roaming cable engineers on the Indian Ocean. This piece uncovers the people, the struggles, the indigenous knowledge and the hidden work that went into a key piece of 19th-century technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial Archaeology Review\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"80 - 95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial Archaeology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03090728.2022.2121461\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Archaeology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03090728.2022.2121461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT This piece problematises Daniel Headrick’s 1981 work on 19th-century telegraphy: Tools of Empire. Instead of viewing the telegraph as a neat Imperial tool, this piece deconstructs the cables into its messy constituent parts, teasing out the international landscapes of people and materials linked by them. We move from the colonial copper-smelters in Chile to the indigenous gutta-percha collectors of Sarawak; from the peasant tar-burners of rural Sweden to the turpentine workers trapped in camps in the postbellum American south; from the partying jute-growers of Bangladesh to the roaming cable engineers on the Indian Ocean. This piece uncovers the people, the struggles, the indigenous knowledge and the hidden work that went into a key piece of 19th-century technology.
期刊介绍:
Industrial Archaeology Review aims to publish research in industrial archaeology, which is defined as a period study embracing the tangible evidence of social, economic and technological development in the period since industrialisation, generally from the early-18th century onwards. It is a peer-reviewed academic journal, with scholarly standards of presentation, yet seeks to encourage submissions from both amateurs and professionals which will inform all those working in the field of current developments. Industrial Archaeology Review is the journal of the Association for Industrial Archaeology. Published twice a year, the focal point and common theme of its contents is the surviving evidence of industrial activity.