寻找大自然的宝藏还是向大自然学习?生态技术转向的叙事矛盾

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Nature + Culture Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.3167/NC.2017.120204
S. V. D. Hout, M. Drenthen
{"title":"寻找大自然的宝藏还是向大自然学习?生态技术转向的叙事矛盾","authors":"S. V. D. Hout, M. Drenthen","doi":"10.3167/NC.2017.120204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientists need narrative structures, metaphors and images to explain and legitimize research practices that are usually described in abstract and technical terms. Yet, sometimes they do not take proper account of the complexity and multi-layered character of their narrative self-presentations. This also applies to the narratives of ecotechnology explored in this article: the treasure quest narrative used in the emerging field of metagenomics, and the tutorial narrative proposed by the learningfrom-nature movement biomimicry. Researchers from both fields tend to underestimate the general public’s understanding of the inherent ambivalence of the narratives suggested by them; the treasure quest and tutorial narratives build upon larger master-narratives which can be found throughout our culture, for instance in literature, art and film. We will show how these genres reveal the moral ambivalence of both narratives, using two well-known movies as illustrations: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) and Disney’s The Sorcerer’s Apprentice (1940).","PeriodicalId":46069,"journal":{"name":"Nature + Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/NC.2017.120204","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hunting for Nature’s Treasures or Learning from Nature?: The Narrative Ambivalence of the Ecotechnological Turn\",\"authors\":\"S. V. D. Hout, M. Drenthen\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/NC.2017.120204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientists need narrative structures, metaphors and images to explain and legitimize research practices that are usually described in abstract and technical terms. Yet, sometimes they do not take proper account of the complexity and multi-layered character of their narrative self-presentations. This also applies to the narratives of ecotechnology explored in this article: the treasure quest narrative used in the emerging field of metagenomics, and the tutorial narrative proposed by the learningfrom-nature movement biomimicry. Researchers from both fields tend to underestimate the general public’s understanding of the inherent ambivalence of the narratives suggested by them; the treasure quest and tutorial narratives build upon larger master-narratives which can be found throughout our culture, for instance in literature, art and film. We will show how these genres reveal the moral ambivalence of both narratives, using two well-known movies as illustrations: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) and Disney’s The Sorcerer’s Apprentice (1940).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature + Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/NC.2017.120204\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature + Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/NC.2017.120204\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature + Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/NC.2017.120204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

科学家需要叙事结构、隐喻和图像来解释和合法化通常用抽象和技术术语描述的研究实践。然而,有时他们没有适当考虑到叙事自我呈现的复杂性和多层次性。这也适用于本文探索的生态技术叙事:新兴的宏基因组学领域中使用的寻宝叙事,以及从自然运动仿生学中学习提出的教程叙事。这两个领域的研究人员都倾向于低估公众对他们提出的叙事固有矛盾心理的理解;寻宝和辅导叙事建立在更大的大师叙事之上,这些大师叙事可以在我们的文化中找到,例如在文学、艺术和电影中。我们将以两部著名电影为例,展示这些类型如何揭示这两种叙事的道德矛盾:《夺宝奇兵》(1981年)和迪士尼的《巫师学徒》(1940年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hunting for Nature’s Treasures or Learning from Nature?: The Narrative Ambivalence of the Ecotechnological Turn
Scientists need narrative structures, metaphors and images to explain and legitimize research practices that are usually described in abstract and technical terms. Yet, sometimes they do not take proper account of the complexity and multi-layered character of their narrative self-presentations. This also applies to the narratives of ecotechnology explored in this article: the treasure quest narrative used in the emerging field of metagenomics, and the tutorial narrative proposed by the learningfrom-nature movement biomimicry. Researchers from both fields tend to underestimate the general public’s understanding of the inherent ambivalence of the narratives suggested by them; the treasure quest and tutorial narratives build upon larger master-narratives which can be found throughout our culture, for instance in literature, art and film. We will show how these genres reveal the moral ambivalence of both narratives, using two well-known movies as illustrations: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) and Disney’s The Sorcerer’s Apprentice (1940).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature + Culture
Nature + Culture ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Researching Cities, Transforming Ecology A Chef, a Scientist, and Soil Erosion “You Can't Even Predict the Rain Anymore” Dark Laboratories of the Soil Reframing the Invasive Species Challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1