诺维奇的朱利安“一切都会好起来”的神学研究

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/00405736231172680
Jong-hoi Kim
{"title":"诺维奇的朱利安“一切都会好起来”的神学研究","authors":"Jong-hoi Kim","doi":"10.1177/00405736231172680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the perspective in Julian Norwich's words, “All Shall Be Well” through the lens of the Korean Presbyterian Church, specifically its focus on sin and repentance as a practical interest. Examining the concept of sin that is emphasized in practice, I compare John Calvin’s theology of sin with Julian’s to reconsider a comprehensive understanding of sin for helping Korean Christians on their spiritual journey.","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"80 1","pages":"222 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Theological Study of Julian of Norwich’s Hopeful Words “All Shall Be Well”\",\"authors\":\"Jong-hoi Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00405736231172680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the perspective in Julian Norwich's words, “All Shall Be Well” through the lens of the Korean Presbyterian Church, specifically its focus on sin and repentance as a practical interest. Examining the concept of sin that is emphasized in practice, I compare John Calvin’s theology of sin with Julian’s to reconsider a comprehensive understanding of sin for helping Korean Christians on their spiritual journey.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEOLOGY TODAY\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"222 - 232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEOLOGY TODAY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231172680\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEOLOGY TODAY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231172680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从韩国长老会的视角,分析了朱利安·诺里奇“一切都会好起来”这句话的视角,特别是它对罪恶和忏悔作为一种现实利益的关注。在考察实践中所强调的罪的概念时,我将约翰·加尔文的罪神学与朱利安的罪神学进行了比较,以重新考虑对罪的全面理解,从而帮助韩国基督徒走上精神之旅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Theological Study of Julian of Norwich’s Hopeful Words “All Shall Be Well”
This article analyzes the perspective in Julian Norwich's words, “All Shall Be Well” through the lens of the Korean Presbyterian Church, specifically its focus on sin and repentance as a practical interest. Examining the concept of sin that is emphasized in practice, I compare John Calvin’s theology of sin with Julian’s to reconsider a comprehensive understanding of sin for helping Korean Christians on their spiritual journey.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
THEOLOGY TODAY
THEOLOGY TODAY RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Environmentalism as Religion The Significance of the Theological Declaration of Barmen 1934 and “Christophobia in Europe” Today Book Review: The Ethics of Tainted Legacies: Human Flourishing after Traumatic Pasts by Karen V. Guth Book Review: 20 Myths about Religion and Politics in America by Ryan P. Burge Book Review: Against the Hounds of Hell: A Life of Howard Thurman by Peter Eisenstadt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1