分层生殖、子宫切除术和选择不孕的社会过程

IF 7.2 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Gender & Society Pub Date : 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1177/08912432231175655
Andréa Becker
{"title":"分层生殖、子宫切除术和选择不孕的社会过程","authors":"Andréa Becker","doi":"10.1177/08912432231175655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shifting cultural norms transform the uses and meanings of medical practices, and, in turn, medical practices have the capacity to alter social relations. In this article, I use hysterectomy as a case for understanding how reproductive health practices are constrained by and contribute to notions of gender, race, and stratified reproduction. Hysterectomy is regularly performed yet understudied and has been transformed by both technological advances and shifting norms in gender and reproduction. I draw on 100 in-depth interviews with individuals who had, want, or are considering hysterectomy to treat chronic reproductive health conditions or as gender-affirming care for trans and gender-nonbinary (TGNB) individuals. These comparative groups shed insight across three gender groups (cis women, trans men, nonbinary) as well as across race. Findings show divergent patient–provider interactions ranging from physician support to provider coercion to gatekeeping. Similarly, the data reveal that hysterectomy evokes a wide range of reactions—from delight to neutrality to grief. These distinct reactions and interactions map on to gender, race, and ethnicity, revealing persistent reproductive stratification by social positionality. Bringing together feminist science and technology studies with intersectional theories of the body and reproductive justice, I show how stratified reproduction operates when gender identities vary and introduce the concept of opting into infertility.","PeriodicalId":48351,"journal":{"name":"Gender & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stratified Reproduction, Hysterectomy, and the Social Process of Opting into Infertility\",\"authors\":\"Andréa Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08912432231175655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Shifting cultural norms transform the uses and meanings of medical practices, and, in turn, medical practices have the capacity to alter social relations. In this article, I use hysterectomy as a case for understanding how reproductive health practices are constrained by and contribute to notions of gender, race, and stratified reproduction. Hysterectomy is regularly performed yet understudied and has been transformed by both technological advances and shifting norms in gender and reproduction. I draw on 100 in-depth interviews with individuals who had, want, or are considering hysterectomy to treat chronic reproductive health conditions or as gender-affirming care for trans and gender-nonbinary (TGNB) individuals. These comparative groups shed insight across three gender groups (cis women, trans men, nonbinary) as well as across race. Findings show divergent patient–provider interactions ranging from physician support to provider coercion to gatekeeping. Similarly, the data reveal that hysterectomy evokes a wide range of reactions—from delight to neutrality to grief. These distinct reactions and interactions map on to gender, race, and ethnicity, revealing persistent reproductive stratification by social positionality. Bringing together feminist science and technology studies with intersectional theories of the body and reproductive justice, I show how stratified reproduction operates when gender identities vary and introduce the concept of opting into infertility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432231175655\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432231175655","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

不断变化的文化规范改变了医疗实践的用途和意义,反过来,医疗实践也有能力改变社会关系。在这篇文章中,我以子宫切除术为例来了解生殖健康实践如何受到性别、种族和分层生殖观念的约束并对其产生影响。子宫切除术经常进行,但研究不足,并且由于技术进步和性别和生殖规范的转变而发生了变化。我对那些曾经、想要或正在考虑子宫切除术来治疗慢性生殖健康状况的人进行了100次深入采访,或将其作为跨性别和性别非二元性(TGNB)个体的性别确认护理。这些比较组深入了解了三个性别群体(顺式女性、跨性别男性、非二进制)以及种族。研究结果显示,从医生支持到提供者胁迫再到把关,患者与提供者之间的互动各不相同。同样,数据显示,子宫切除术会引起广泛的反应——从喜悦到中立再到悲伤。这些不同的反应和互动映射到性别、种族和民族,揭示了社会地位对生殖的持续分层。将女权主义科学和技术研究与身体和生殖正义的交叉理论结合在一起,我展示了当性别认同不同时,分层生殖是如何运作的,并引入了选择不孕不育的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stratified Reproduction, Hysterectomy, and the Social Process of Opting into Infertility
Shifting cultural norms transform the uses and meanings of medical practices, and, in turn, medical practices have the capacity to alter social relations. In this article, I use hysterectomy as a case for understanding how reproductive health practices are constrained by and contribute to notions of gender, race, and stratified reproduction. Hysterectomy is regularly performed yet understudied and has been transformed by both technological advances and shifting norms in gender and reproduction. I draw on 100 in-depth interviews with individuals who had, want, or are considering hysterectomy to treat chronic reproductive health conditions or as gender-affirming care for trans and gender-nonbinary (TGNB) individuals. These comparative groups shed insight across three gender groups (cis women, trans men, nonbinary) as well as across race. Findings show divergent patient–provider interactions ranging from physician support to provider coercion to gatekeeping. Similarly, the data reveal that hysterectomy evokes a wide range of reactions—from delight to neutrality to grief. These distinct reactions and interactions map on to gender, race, and ethnicity, revealing persistent reproductive stratification by social positionality. Bringing together feminist science and technology studies with intersectional theories of the body and reproductive justice, I show how stratified reproduction operates when gender identities vary and introduce the concept of opting into infertility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender & Society
Gender & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Gender & Society promotes feminist scholarship and the social scientific study of gender. Gender & Society publishes theoretically engaged and methodologically rigorous articles that make original contributions to gender theory. The journal takes a multidisciplinary, intersectional, and global approach to gender analyses.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Body and Gender: Sociological Perspectives By Roberta Sassatelli and Rossella Ghigi and Interpreting the Body: Between Meaning and Matter Edited by Anne Marie Champagne and Asia Friedman Mobility for What? Space, Time, Labor, and Gender in South Asia Workplace Breastfeeding As Foodwork In Organizational Settings: Advancing Knowledge From Black, Low-Income Women In South Africa Under the Smokescreen of Horizontality: Gendered Leading Tasks within the Yellow Vest Movement Refusing Gender: Intimate (Mis)Recognition of Gender Identity and Its Relation to Family Instabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1