S. Mahalingam, R. Green, M. Slim, A. Alatsatianos, Y. Ramakrishnan, B. Stew, C. Hopkins
{"title":"英国鼻学会国家COVID-19研究:恢复选择性手术","authors":"S. Mahalingam, R. Green, M. Slim, A. Alatsatianos, Y. Ramakrishnan, B. Stew, C. Hopkins","doi":"10.4193/RHINOL/21.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: As elective services resumed in the aftermath of the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the British Rhinology Society and Juniors Committees carried out a national prospective study in order to assess and optimise safety and efficacy of surgery. Methodology: Data from 1063 cases was collected from 111 centres in the United Kingdom (excluding Northern Ireland) within the study period (1st June – 14th August 2020), and a three week follow-up period to assess whether there were any cases of SARS-CoV-2 amongst patients and staff. Results: 89.2% of procedures took place in England. 90.6% of patients had minimal comorbidities (ASA Grade 1 or 2). 98.4% of patients were known to have a COVID negative status prior to surgery, with the majority (99.8%) investigated through Viral PCR alone. The most common form of pre-operative shielding was to self-isolate for 14 days (82.5% of cases). 32.6% of cases were performed in an alternative theatre environment, and in 5.3% the private sector was used for NHS patients. In 21.6% of procedures, unfamiliar anaesthetic teams were used, and in 19.2% unfamiliar theatre teams. There was a higher probability of unfamiliar theatre staff or anaesthetist, when operating in an alternative theatre environment. Trainees were not present in theatre in 24.2% of cases. Full PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was worn by the operating surgeon in 64.1% of cases. No patients or staff were reported to have developed SARS-CoV-2 in the three week period following surgery. Intra-operative challenges were reported in 19.7% of cases and were primarily associated with impaired communication (8.8%) or impaired vision (6.9%). There was a higher chance of challenges reported when unfamiliar theatre teams were present. Conclusions: This data suggests that overall, the resumption of rhinological elective services has been performed safely with no cases of SARS-CoV-2 reported in patients or staff. We must consider the challenges of operating in unfamiliar environments together with surgical and/or anaesthetic teams, as well as the impact on training.","PeriodicalId":74737,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology online","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The British Rhinology Society National COVID-19 Study: Resuming Elective Surgery\",\"authors\":\"S. Mahalingam, R. Green, M. Slim, A. Alatsatianos, Y. Ramakrishnan, B. Stew, C. Hopkins\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/RHINOL/21.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: As elective services resumed in the aftermath of the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the British Rhinology Society and Juniors Committees carried out a national prospective study in order to assess and optimise safety and efficacy of surgery. Methodology: Data from 1063 cases was collected from 111 centres in the United Kingdom (excluding Northern Ireland) within the study period (1st June – 14th August 2020), and a three week follow-up period to assess whether there were any cases of SARS-CoV-2 amongst patients and staff. Results: 89.2% of procedures took place in England. 90.6% of patients had minimal comorbidities (ASA Grade 1 or 2). 98.4% of patients were known to have a COVID negative status prior to surgery, with the majority (99.8%) investigated through Viral PCR alone. The most common form of pre-operative shielding was to self-isolate for 14 days (82.5% of cases). 32.6% of cases were performed in an alternative theatre environment, and in 5.3% the private sector was used for NHS patients. In 21.6% of procedures, unfamiliar anaesthetic teams were used, and in 19.2% unfamiliar theatre teams. There was a higher probability of unfamiliar theatre staff or anaesthetist, when operating in an alternative theatre environment. Trainees were not present in theatre in 24.2% of cases. Full PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was worn by the operating surgeon in 64.1% of cases. No patients or staff were reported to have developed SARS-CoV-2 in the three week period following surgery. Intra-operative challenges were reported in 19.7% of cases and were primarily associated with impaired communication (8.8%) or impaired vision (6.9%). There was a higher chance of challenges reported when unfamiliar theatre teams were present. Conclusions: This data suggests that overall, the resumption of rhinological elective services has been performed safely with no cases of SARS-CoV-2 reported in patients or staff. We must consider the challenges of operating in unfamiliar environments together with surgical and/or anaesthetic teams, as well as the impact on training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology online\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/RHINOL/21.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/RHINOL/21.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The British Rhinology Society National COVID-19 Study: Resuming Elective Surgery
Background: As elective services resumed in the aftermath of the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the British Rhinology Society and Juniors Committees carried out a national prospective study in order to assess and optimise safety and efficacy of surgery. Methodology: Data from 1063 cases was collected from 111 centres in the United Kingdom (excluding Northern Ireland) within the study period (1st June – 14th August 2020), and a three week follow-up period to assess whether there were any cases of SARS-CoV-2 amongst patients and staff. Results: 89.2% of procedures took place in England. 90.6% of patients had minimal comorbidities (ASA Grade 1 or 2). 98.4% of patients were known to have a COVID negative status prior to surgery, with the majority (99.8%) investigated through Viral PCR alone. The most common form of pre-operative shielding was to self-isolate for 14 days (82.5% of cases). 32.6% of cases were performed in an alternative theatre environment, and in 5.3% the private sector was used for NHS patients. In 21.6% of procedures, unfamiliar anaesthetic teams were used, and in 19.2% unfamiliar theatre teams. There was a higher probability of unfamiliar theatre staff or anaesthetist, when operating in an alternative theatre environment. Trainees were not present in theatre in 24.2% of cases. Full PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was worn by the operating surgeon in 64.1% of cases. No patients or staff were reported to have developed SARS-CoV-2 in the three week period following surgery. Intra-operative challenges were reported in 19.7% of cases and were primarily associated with impaired communication (8.8%) or impaired vision (6.9%). There was a higher chance of challenges reported when unfamiliar theatre teams were present. Conclusions: This data suggests that overall, the resumption of rhinological elective services has been performed safely with no cases of SARS-CoV-2 reported in patients or staff. We must consider the challenges of operating in unfamiliar environments together with surgical and/or anaesthetic teams, as well as the impact on training.