在低资源环境中接受流产治疗的妇女的心理健康结果和感知护理需求

J. Nwafor, V. Obi, C. Obi, C. Ibo, D. Ugoji, B. Onwe, V. Onuchukwu
{"title":"在低资源环境中接受流产治疗的妇女的心理健康结果和感知护理需求","authors":"J. Nwafor, V. Obi, C. Obi, C. Ibo, D. Ugoji, B. Onwe, V. Onuchukwu","doi":"10.4103/tjog.tjog_44_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There have been many advances in the management of miscarriage in recent times including the introduction of expectant and medical management protocols. However, a study of the psychological impact of the condition and its management has not received similar attention. Aim: To determine the psychosocial consequences of miscarriages and perceived needs of the patients compared to the care provided by the hospital. Materials and Method: This was a prospective cohort study conducted between January 15, 2018 and April 30, 2019. Participants were recruited on admission and psychological morbidity was assessed at 1 week after a miscarriage in the gynecological clinics. They were screened for psychological morbidities using DASS 21 (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale). Results: Of 140 women that participated in the study, severe depression was reported in 8 (5.7%) whereas 12 (8.5%) participants reported symptoms of extremely severe depression. Moderate to severe anxiety was present in 23.5% while extremely severe anxiety was noted among 21.5% of the women. Stress was reported in over half of respondents and severe to extremely severe stress occurred in 19.9% of the participants. Factors significantly associated with psychological morbidities following miscarriage include age ≥35 years, no living child, subfertility, planned pregnancy, and assisted conception. Healthcare providers not listening to the patient's concern, non-participation in decision making, and dissatisfaction with care were associated with adverse psychological outcomes. Conclusion: Psychological morbidity following a miscarriage is common among participants in our study. The provision of the correct information and psychological debriefing may be useful in enabling women to adjust emotionally following miscarriage.","PeriodicalId":23302,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental health outcome and perceived care needs of women treated for a miscarriage in a low-resource setting\",\"authors\":\"J. Nwafor, V. Obi, C. Obi, C. Ibo, D. Ugoji, B. Onwe, V. Onuchukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tjog.tjog_44_19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: There have been many advances in the management of miscarriage in recent times including the introduction of expectant and medical management protocols. However, a study of the psychological impact of the condition and its management has not received similar attention. Aim: To determine the psychosocial consequences of miscarriages and perceived needs of the patients compared to the care provided by the hospital. Materials and Method: This was a prospective cohort study conducted between January 15, 2018 and April 30, 2019. Participants were recruited on admission and psychological morbidity was assessed at 1 week after a miscarriage in the gynecological clinics. They were screened for psychological morbidities using DASS 21 (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale). Results: Of 140 women that participated in the study, severe depression was reported in 8 (5.7%) whereas 12 (8.5%) participants reported symptoms of extremely severe depression. Moderate to severe anxiety was present in 23.5% while extremely severe anxiety was noted among 21.5% of the women. Stress was reported in over half of respondents and severe to extremely severe stress occurred in 19.9% of the participants. Factors significantly associated with psychological morbidities following miscarriage include age ≥35 years, no living child, subfertility, planned pregnancy, and assisted conception. Healthcare providers not listening to the patient's concern, non-participation in decision making, and dissatisfaction with care were associated with adverse psychological outcomes. Conclusion: Psychological morbidity following a miscarriage is common among participants in our study. The provision of the correct information and psychological debriefing may be useful in enabling women to adjust emotionally following miscarriage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjog.tjog_44_19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjog.tjog_44_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引言:近年来,流产的管理取得了许多进展,包括引入了孕妇和医疗管理方案。然而,对这种情况的心理影响及其管理的研究并没有得到类似的关注。目的:与医院提供的护理相比,确定流产的心理社会后果和患者的感知需求。材料和方法:这是一项在2018年1月15日至2019年4月30日期间进行的前瞻性队列研究。参与者在入院时被招募,并在流产后1周在妇科诊所评估心理发病率。他们使用DASS 21(抑郁、焦虑和压力量表)进行心理疾病筛查。结果:在参与该研究的140名女性中,有8名(5.7%)报告了严重抑郁症,而12名(8.5%)参与者报告了极其严重的抑郁症症状。23.5%的女性存在中度至重度焦虑,21.5%的女性出现极度焦虑。据报道,超过一半的受访者有压力,19.9%的参与者出现了严重到极度严重的压力。与流产后心理疾病显著相关的因素包括年龄≥35岁、没有活孩子、生育能力低下、计划怀孕和辅助受孕。医疗保健提供者不听取患者的担忧、不参与决策以及对护理的不满与不良心理结果有关。结论:流产后的心理发病率在我们研究的参与者中很常见。提供正确的信息和心理汇报可能有助于女性在流产后调整情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mental health outcome and perceived care needs of women treated for a miscarriage in a low-resource setting
Introduction: There have been many advances in the management of miscarriage in recent times including the introduction of expectant and medical management protocols. However, a study of the psychological impact of the condition and its management has not received similar attention. Aim: To determine the psychosocial consequences of miscarriages and perceived needs of the patients compared to the care provided by the hospital. Materials and Method: This was a prospective cohort study conducted between January 15, 2018 and April 30, 2019. Participants were recruited on admission and psychological morbidity was assessed at 1 week after a miscarriage in the gynecological clinics. They were screened for psychological morbidities using DASS 21 (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale). Results: Of 140 women that participated in the study, severe depression was reported in 8 (5.7%) whereas 12 (8.5%) participants reported symptoms of extremely severe depression. Moderate to severe anxiety was present in 23.5% while extremely severe anxiety was noted among 21.5% of the women. Stress was reported in over half of respondents and severe to extremely severe stress occurred in 19.9% of the participants. Factors significantly associated with psychological morbidities following miscarriage include age ≥35 years, no living child, subfertility, planned pregnancy, and assisted conception. Healthcare providers not listening to the patient's concern, non-participation in decision making, and dissatisfaction with care were associated with adverse psychological outcomes. Conclusion: Psychological morbidity following a miscarriage is common among participants in our study. The provision of the correct information and psychological debriefing may be useful in enabling women to adjust emotionally following miscarriage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trends in vaginal hysterectomy in a Nigerian teaching hospital: A 14-year review Risk factors for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Abuja, Nigeria: A prospective case-control study A randomized controlled trial of rectal diclofenac sodium and intramuscular pentazocine versus intramuscular pentazocine, diclofenac, and paracetamol analgesics for pain relief in the first 48 h after cesarean section Incidence and determinants of pregnancy among women receiving HAART in Simiyu region: 14-year retrospective follow-up A case of Couvelaire uterus with coagulation dysfunction saved successfully with SR PPH suction cannula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1