{"title":"作为哲学和伊斯兰视角的概念","authors":"Suhermanto Jakfar","doi":"10.15642/ISLAMICA.2017.11.2.522-544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discuss the concept of being in the perspective of existentialism and Islam. The closest similarity to the word “being” is to on (Ancient Greece), as the word of einai, to be (on, onta). For Parmenides, “being” (to on) is one, eternal and unchanging. Gabriel Marcel calls the way the human being with the term etre-au-monde, etre in carne, geist-in-welt. Martin Heidegger uses a formula being in the world to characterize human life. Being in the world as a feature of human life, human beings are in the situation. Living in a world of concrete means that there are human relationships with the situation. Sartre said that the real one where there are two, namely: I’etre en soi and I’etre pour Soi. For Sartre, I’etre en soi is the idea that only a concrete phenomenon has ontological status; only something concrete is real. Unlike the being-in-itself, for Sartre the concept of being-for-itself is a state of being that comes with the awareness and self-control. The concept of being (wujud) by Suhrawardi is a mental concepts (mahfum) that do not have the type and diferensia. In the illumination philosophy of Suhrawardi, the idea of wujud can not be separated from nature and depiction of light. The philosophy of wujud by Mulla Sadrâ stands on three basic principles of fundamental importance. These three principles are as follows: wahdat al-wujud, tashkik al-wujud, and tashkik. While Mohammad Iqbal emphasis on metaphysics and anthropological philosophy. Iqbal gives greater emphasis on more concrete dimensions, namely khudi (ego).","PeriodicalId":30844,"journal":{"name":"Islamica Jurnal Studi Keislaman","volume":"11 1","pages":"522-544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Konsep Being Perspektif Filsafat dan Islam\",\"authors\":\"Suhermanto Jakfar\",\"doi\":\"10.15642/ISLAMICA.2017.11.2.522-544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discuss the concept of being in the perspective of existentialism and Islam. The closest similarity to the word “being” is to on (Ancient Greece), as the word of einai, to be (on, onta). For Parmenides, “being” (to on) is one, eternal and unchanging. Gabriel Marcel calls the way the human being with the term etre-au-monde, etre in carne, geist-in-welt. Martin Heidegger uses a formula being in the world to characterize human life. Being in the world as a feature of human life, human beings are in the situation. Living in a world of concrete means that there are human relationships with the situation. Sartre said that the real one where there are two, namely: I’etre en soi and I’etre pour Soi. For Sartre, I’etre en soi is the idea that only a concrete phenomenon has ontological status; only something concrete is real. Unlike the being-in-itself, for Sartre the concept of being-for-itself is a state of being that comes with the awareness and self-control. The concept of being (wujud) by Suhrawardi is a mental concepts (mahfum) that do not have the type and diferensia. In the illumination philosophy of Suhrawardi, the idea of wujud can not be separated from nature and depiction of light. The philosophy of wujud by Mulla Sadrâ stands on three basic principles of fundamental importance. These three principles are as follows: wahdat al-wujud, tashkik al-wujud, and tashkik. While Mohammad Iqbal emphasis on metaphysics and anthropological philosophy. Iqbal gives greater emphasis on more concrete dimensions, namely khudi (ego).\",\"PeriodicalId\":30844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islamica Jurnal Studi Keislaman\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"522-544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islamica Jurnal Studi Keislaman\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15642/ISLAMICA.2017.11.2.522-544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamica Jurnal Studi Keislaman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/ISLAMICA.2017.11.2.522-544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文从存在主义和伊斯兰教的角度探讨存在的概念。与“being”最相似的词是on(古希腊),作为einai的词,to be (on, onta)。对巴门尼德来说,“存在”是唯一的、永恒的、不变的。加布里埃尔·马塞尔称人类的方式为“灵魂在世界”、“灵魂在世界”、“灵魂在世界”。海德格尔用一个“存在于世界”的公式来描述人类的生活。作为人类生活的一个特征,人在世界中是处于处境的。生活在一个具体的世界里意味着人类与环境有关系。萨特说,真实的存在有两种,即:我在这里,我在这里,我在这里,我在这里,我在这里。对萨特来说,“我是如此”是指只有具体的现象才具有本体论地位;只有具体的东西才是真实的。与自在存在不同,萨特认为自为存在的概念是一种伴随着意识和自我控制而来的存在状态。Suhrawardi的存在概念(wujud)是一个没有类型和差异的心理概念(mahfum)。在苏哈拉瓦第的照明哲学中,无物的思想与自然和对光的描绘是分不开的。穆拉·萨德尔的武举哲学建立在三个重要的基本原则之上。这三个原则是:wahdat al-wujud、tashkik al-wujud和tashkik。而穆罕默德·伊克巴尔强调形而上学和人类学哲学。伊克巴尔更加强调更具体的维度,即khudi(自我)。
This article discuss the concept of being in the perspective of existentialism and Islam. The closest similarity to the word “being” is to on (Ancient Greece), as the word of einai, to be (on, onta). For Parmenides, “being” (to on) is one, eternal and unchanging. Gabriel Marcel calls the way the human being with the term etre-au-monde, etre in carne, geist-in-welt. Martin Heidegger uses a formula being in the world to characterize human life. Being in the world as a feature of human life, human beings are in the situation. Living in a world of concrete means that there are human relationships with the situation. Sartre said that the real one where there are two, namely: I’etre en soi and I’etre pour Soi. For Sartre, I’etre en soi is the idea that only a concrete phenomenon has ontological status; only something concrete is real. Unlike the being-in-itself, for Sartre the concept of being-for-itself is a state of being that comes with the awareness and self-control. The concept of being (wujud) by Suhrawardi is a mental concepts (mahfum) that do not have the type and diferensia. In the illumination philosophy of Suhrawardi, the idea of wujud can not be separated from nature and depiction of light. The philosophy of wujud by Mulla Sadrâ stands on three basic principles of fundamental importance. These three principles are as follows: wahdat al-wujud, tashkik al-wujud, and tashkik. While Mohammad Iqbal emphasis on metaphysics and anthropological philosophy. Iqbal gives greater emphasis on more concrete dimensions, namely khudi (ego).