期权属于个人投资者的投资组合吗?

Victor Haghani, V. Ragulin, James White
{"title":"期权属于个人投资者的投资组合吗?","authors":"Victor Haghani, V. Ragulin, James White","doi":"10.3905/jod.2022.1.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of options by individual investors has grown dramatically in recent years. The authors evaluate several popular options strategies, including portfolio insurance, life cycle investing, buy-write, and single-stock call-buying, from the perspective of an individual investor. The authors suggest that Expected Utility is the most appropriate metric for such evaluation, as it accounts for both return and risk, and naturally handles non-linear payoffs. They assess the different options strategies under a range of assumptions of asset price behavior, investor risk appetite, and option market pricing relative to fair value. They find that for a representative investor the benefit of adding options to the portfolio is at best quite small, and most of this improvement also can be achieved through periodic portfolio rebalancing. However, the benefits of options can be greater for several special investor categories and in certain market environments. The authors also identify several popular uses of options that are likely to be quite harmful to investor welfare.","PeriodicalId":34223,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Derivat","volume":"29 1","pages":"13 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Options Belong in the Portfolios of Individual Investors?\",\"authors\":\"Victor Haghani, V. Ragulin, James White\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jod.2022.1.145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of options by individual investors has grown dramatically in recent years. The authors evaluate several popular options strategies, including portfolio insurance, life cycle investing, buy-write, and single-stock call-buying, from the perspective of an individual investor. The authors suggest that Expected Utility is the most appropriate metric for such evaluation, as it accounts for both return and risk, and naturally handles non-linear payoffs. They assess the different options strategies under a range of assumptions of asset price behavior, investor risk appetite, and option market pricing relative to fair value. They find that for a representative investor the benefit of adding options to the portfolio is at best quite small, and most of this improvement also can be achieved through periodic portfolio rebalancing. However, the benefits of options can be greater for several special investor categories and in certain market environments. The authors also identify several popular uses of options that are likely to be quite harmful to investor welfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Derivat\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"13 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Derivat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2022.1.145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Derivat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2022.1.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,个人投资者对期权的使用急剧增长。作者从个人投资者的角度评估了几种流行的期权策略,包括投资组合保险、生命周期投资、买入-卖出和单股看涨期权购买。作者认为,预期效用是这种评估的最合适指标,因为它既考虑了回报又考虑了风险,并且自然地处理了非线性收益。他们在资产价格行为、投资者风险偏好和相对于公允价值的期权市场定价的一系列假设下评估不同的期权策略。他们发现,对于一个有代表性的投资者来说,在投资组合中添加期权的好处充其量是很小的,而这种改善大多也可以通过定期的投资组合再平衡来实现。然而,对于几个特殊的投资者类别和某些市场环境,期权的好处可能更大。作者还指出了期权的几种流行用途,这些用途可能对投资者福利相当有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Options Belong in the Portfolios of Individual Investors?
The use of options by individual investors has grown dramatically in recent years. The authors evaluate several popular options strategies, including portfolio insurance, life cycle investing, buy-write, and single-stock call-buying, from the perspective of an individual investor. The authors suggest that Expected Utility is the most appropriate metric for such evaluation, as it accounts for both return and risk, and naturally handles non-linear payoffs. They assess the different options strategies under a range of assumptions of asset price behavior, investor risk appetite, and option market pricing relative to fair value. They find that for a representative investor the benefit of adding options to the portfolio is at best quite small, and most of this improvement also can be achieved through periodic portfolio rebalancing. However, the benefits of options can be greater for several special investor categories and in certain market environments. The authors also identify several popular uses of options that are likely to be quite harmful to investor welfare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lattice Approach for Option Pricing under Lévy Processes Caplets/Floorlets with Backward-Looking Risk-Free Rates under the One- and Two-Factor Hull-White Models Editor’s Letter Vol, Skew, and Smile Trading Option Valuation with Nonmonotonic Pricing Kernel and Embedded Volatility Component Premiums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1