COVID-19国家援助计划中包含的“避税天堂”条件:可以测试吗?

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2021001
E. Kemmeren
{"title":"COVID-19国家援助计划中包含的“避税天堂”条件:可以测试吗?","authors":"E. Kemmeren","doi":"10.54648/ecta2021001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kemmeren offers insights whether the condition of making COVID-19 State aid dependent on the absence of links to tax havens be tested against fundamental freedoms The author adheres to a traditional legal methodology This methodology makes it possible to acquire a more complete understanding of the possible impact of fundamental freedoms on conditions to provide COVID-19 State aid, more specifically on tax haven conditions For the descriptions, analyses, and evaluations, the author has used sources of law, including national tax law, treaties, global issues (e g global principles in redistributive justice), legislative history, technical explanations, case law, decisions, statements of practice, public rulings, and literature","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Tax Haven’ Conditions Included in COVID-19 State Aid Schemes: Can They Be Tested?\",\"authors\":\"E. Kemmeren\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/ecta2021001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kemmeren offers insights whether the condition of making COVID-19 State aid dependent on the absence of links to tax havens be tested against fundamental freedoms The author adheres to a traditional legal methodology This methodology makes it possible to acquire a more complete understanding of the possible impact of fundamental freedoms on conditions to provide COVID-19 State aid, more specifically on tax haven conditions For the descriptions, analyses, and evaluations, the author has used sources of law, including national tax law, treaties, global issues (e g global principles in redistributive justice), legislative history, technical explanations, case law, decisions, statements of practice, public rulings, and literature\",\"PeriodicalId\":43686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EC Tax Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EC Tax Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2021001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EC Tax Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2021001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Kemmeren提出了一些见解,即是否根据基本自由来检验是否依赖于与避税天堂没有联系的COVID-19国家援助的条件。作者坚持使用传统的法律方法,这种方法可以更全面地了解基本自由对提供COVID-19国家援助的条件的可能影响,更具体地说,是对避税天堂条件的影响。作者使用了法律来源,包括国家税法、条约、全球问题(如再分配正义的全球原则)、立法历史、技术解释、判例法、判决、实践声明、公共裁决和文献
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Tax Haven’ Conditions Included in COVID-19 State Aid Schemes: Can They Be Tested?
Kemmeren offers insights whether the condition of making COVID-19 State aid dependent on the absence of links to tax havens be tested against fundamental freedoms The author adheres to a traditional legal methodology This methodology makes it possible to acquire a more complete understanding of the possible impact of fundamental freedoms on conditions to provide COVID-19 State aid, more specifically on tax haven conditions For the descriptions, analyses, and evaluations, the author has used sources of law, including national tax law, treaties, global issues (e g global principles in redistributive justice), legislative history, technical explanations, case law, decisions, statements of practice, public rulings, and literature
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Editorial: We Need to Know When Previous Case-Law Has Been ‘Overruled’! - A Plea for More Legal Certainty in EU Tax Tax Information, Third Parties and GDPR: Legal Challenges and Hints from the Court of Justice DAC7: Some Thoughts on the Different Roles of Platform Operators and the Appropriate Definition of the Scope of Reporting Obligations Forum: AG Kokott Tries to Bring Clarity to the Selectivity Test for Individual Tax Rulings VAT in the Digital Age Package: Singling Out the Single VAT Registration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1