“哈伯斯基地”?关于课程通用国家字母排序过程的思考

Evelyn Clara Luz, Geise Hellen da Silva Caxiado, N. D. Azevedo
{"title":"“哈伯斯基地”?关于课程通用国家字母排序过程的思考","authors":"Evelyn Clara Luz, Geise Hellen da Silva Caxiado, N. D. Azevedo","doi":"10.5747/ch.2021.v18.h515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work has as general objective to reflect on the curricular transformations for literacy from the 1980s on. As specific objectives, it is intended to: a) discuss the degree of importance in the teaching and learning process attributed by the BNCC to literacy; b) reflect on the BNCC construction process; c) to discuss the findings made by research on the theme \"literacy and BNCC\" that occurred between 2015 and 2020. Characterized as a research of qualitative and bibliographic approach, studied the theme through books and articles made available in virtual libraries, scientific journals and in the Capes Database considering the research published between 2015 and 2020. We conclude that there are many problems in the BNCC proposal, such as not offering more concrete actions related to literacy, while focusing much of this function only on the teacher. Finally, we answer ed the main question of this research: \"Habemos Base\"? If we are going to think of a document that has the text as the main work, we can mention that we have a basic proposal. However, if we think of the student as a subject and the teacher who needs resources at his disposal, as well as a continuous quality training, we can measure that only the BNCC does not guarantee this evolution that we want, and there is a risk that, once again, it will be a proposal that does not leave the role with the expected effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":33252,"journal":{"name":"Colloquium Humanarum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"HABEMUS BASE\\\"?REFLEXÕES SOBRE O PROCESSO DE ALFABETIZAÇÃO NA BASE NACIONAL COMUM CURRICULAR\",\"authors\":\"Evelyn Clara Luz, Geise Hellen da Silva Caxiado, N. D. Azevedo\",\"doi\":\"10.5747/ch.2021.v18.h515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work has as general objective to reflect on the curricular transformations for literacy from the 1980s on. As specific objectives, it is intended to: a) discuss the degree of importance in the teaching and learning process attributed by the BNCC to literacy; b) reflect on the BNCC construction process; c) to discuss the findings made by research on the theme \\\"literacy and BNCC\\\" that occurred between 2015 and 2020. Characterized as a research of qualitative and bibliographic approach, studied the theme through books and articles made available in virtual libraries, scientific journals and in the Capes Database considering the research published between 2015 and 2020. We conclude that there are many problems in the BNCC proposal, such as not offering more concrete actions related to literacy, while focusing much of this function only on the teacher. Finally, we answer ed the main question of this research: \\\"Habemos Base\\\"? If we are going to think of a document that has the text as the main work, we can mention that we have a basic proposal. However, if we think of the student as a subject and the teacher who needs resources at his disposal, as well as a continuous quality training, we can measure that only the BNCC does not guarantee this evolution that we want, and there is a risk that, once again, it will be a proposal that does not leave the role with the expected effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colloquium Humanarum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colloquium Humanarum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5747/ch.2021.v18.h515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloquium Humanarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5747/ch.2021.v18.h515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的总体目标是反思自20世纪80年代以来识字课程的转变。作为具体目标,它的目的是:a)讨论在教学和学习过程中,BNCC赋予读写能力的重要程度;b)对BNCC建设过程的反思;c)讨论2015年至2020年“扫盲与BNCC”主题研究的结果。以定性和书目方法的研究为特征,通过虚拟图书馆、科学期刊和Capes数据库中提供的书籍和文章研究了这一主题,并考虑了2015年至2020年间发表的研究。我们得出结论,BNCC提案中存在许多问题,例如没有提供更多与扫盲相关的具体行动,而将大部分功能只集中在教师身上。最后,我们回答了本研究的主要问题:“Habemos基地”?如果我们要考虑一份以文本为主要工作的文件,我们可以说我们有一个基本建议。然而,如果我们认为学生是一个主体,而教师需要自己支配的资源,以及持续的质量培训,我们可以衡量,只有BNCC不能保证我们想要的这种演变,并且存在这样的风险,再一次,这将是一个没有给角色留下预期有效性的提议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"HABEMUS BASE"?REFLEXÕES SOBRE O PROCESSO DE ALFABETIZAÇÃO NA BASE NACIONAL COMUM CURRICULAR
This work has as general objective to reflect on the curricular transformations for literacy from the 1980s on. As specific objectives, it is intended to: a) discuss the degree of importance in the teaching and learning process attributed by the BNCC to literacy; b) reflect on the BNCC construction process; c) to discuss the findings made by research on the theme "literacy and BNCC" that occurred between 2015 and 2020. Characterized as a research of qualitative and bibliographic approach, studied the theme through books and articles made available in virtual libraries, scientific journals and in the Capes Database considering the research published between 2015 and 2020. We conclude that there are many problems in the BNCC proposal, such as not offering more concrete actions related to literacy, while focusing much of this function only on the teacher. Finally, we answer ed the main question of this research: "Habemos Base"? If we are going to think of a document that has the text as the main work, we can mention that we have a basic proposal. However, if we think of the student as a subject and the teacher who needs resources at his disposal, as well as a continuous quality training, we can measure that only the BNCC does not guarantee this evolution that we want, and there is a risk that, once again, it will be a proposal that does not leave the role with the expected effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
INTERVENÇÕES E FUNÇÕES EXECUTIVAS: UMA REVISÃO DE LITERATURA RELAÇÕES ENTRE CLIMA ESCOLAR, DESEMPENHO ESCOLAR E DESENVOLVIMENTO DE VALORES: ANÁLISE DA LITERATURA O QUE REVELAM OS DOCUMENTOS OFICIAIS PARA A FORMAÇÃO INICIAL DE PROFESSORES DA EDUCAÇÃO BÁSICA NO BRASIL E NO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO PARTICIPAÇÃO E MOBILIZAÇÃO DOS FÓRUNS DE EDUCAÇÃO DE JOVENS E ADULTOS NO YOUTUBE DURANTE A PANDEMIA DA COVID-19: ANÁLISE METODOLÓGICA MAPEANDO PESQUISAS NACIONAIS SOBRE DESENGAJAMENTO MORAL NA PERSPECTIVA DA TEORIA SOCIAL COGNITIVA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1