一项观察性研究,以确定桥粒蛋白的间接免疫荧光和ELISA在自身免疫性大疱性疾病诊断和监测中的作用

Veena Kharayat , Biju Vasudevan , K. Lekshmi Priya , Rajesh Verma , Prabal Deb , M.S. Deora
{"title":"一项观察性研究,以确定桥粒蛋白的间接免疫荧光和ELISA在自身免疫性大疱性疾病诊断和监测中的作用","authors":"Veena Kharayat ,&nbsp;Biju Vasudevan ,&nbsp;K. Lekshmi Priya ,&nbsp;Rajesh Verma ,&nbsp;Prabal Deb ,&nbsp;M.S. Deora","doi":"10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Autoimmune bullous disorder (AIBD) is a diverse group of blistering dermatoses that affects the skin and mucous membrane, characterized by the formation of autoantibodies against the desmosomal glycoproteins and adhesion molecular components of the basement membrane zone. Various immunoassay techniques for serological diagnosis are Direct Immunofluorescence (DIF), Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF), Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting. Quantitative ELISA titer can also be used to monitor the disease activity and response to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of IIF in diagnosing various AIBDs and the role of ELISA for desmogleins in monitoring disease activity in the pemphigus group of disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 45 patients with freshly diagnosed AIBD were included in the study. Skin biopsies were done to establish the diagnosis by histopathology and DIF. BIOCHIP-based IIF assay was performed on the sera of the patient. The sensitivity and specificity of the IIF assay were then calculated based on the established diagnosis by Histopathological examination (HPE) and DIF. Quantitative ELISA titer was performed to measure the antibody (anti desmoglein (Dsg) 1 and 3) titre in serum samples of patients with pemphigus at baseline, 1 and 3 months follow-up after initiation of appropriate treatment therapy and results were then compared with disease activity scoring system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sensitivity and specificity of IIF for Dsg 1 for the pemphigus group were derived to be 85.7% and 98.2% respectively, while that for Dsg 3 were 100% and 98.7%, respectively. Sensitivity (90–100%) of IIF for Bullous pemphigoid was higher than specificity (85–96%). The ELISA titers of anti Dsg1 and 3 were also observed to fall sequentially so was the disease activity score during the follow-up visits at 1 and 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Biochip IIF assay can be used as a screening tool for the serological diagnosis of AIBD and quantitative ELISA for monitoring the disease activity and response to treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39387,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal Armed Forces India","volume":"81 1","pages":"Pages 80-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An observational study to determine the role of indirect immunofluorescence and ELISA for desmogleins in the diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune bullous disorders\",\"authors\":\"Veena Kharayat ,&nbsp;Biju Vasudevan ,&nbsp;K. Lekshmi Priya ,&nbsp;Rajesh Verma ,&nbsp;Prabal Deb ,&nbsp;M.S. Deora\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.05.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Autoimmune bullous disorder (AIBD) is a diverse group of blistering dermatoses that affects the skin and mucous membrane, characterized by the formation of autoantibodies against the desmosomal glycoproteins and adhesion molecular components of the basement membrane zone. Various immunoassay techniques for serological diagnosis are Direct Immunofluorescence (DIF), Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF), Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting. Quantitative ELISA titer can also be used to monitor the disease activity and response to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of IIF in diagnosing various AIBDs and the role of ELISA for desmogleins in monitoring disease activity in the pemphigus group of disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 45 patients with freshly diagnosed AIBD were included in the study. Skin biopsies were done to establish the diagnosis by histopathology and DIF. BIOCHIP-based IIF assay was performed on the sera of the patient. The sensitivity and specificity of the IIF assay were then calculated based on the established diagnosis by Histopathological examination (HPE) and DIF. Quantitative ELISA titer was performed to measure the antibody (anti desmoglein (Dsg) 1 and 3) titre in serum samples of patients with pemphigus at baseline, 1 and 3 months follow-up after initiation of appropriate treatment therapy and results were then compared with disease activity scoring system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sensitivity and specificity of IIF for Dsg 1 for the pemphigus group were derived to be 85.7% and 98.2% respectively, while that for Dsg 3 were 100% and 98.7%, respectively. Sensitivity (90–100%) of IIF for Bullous pemphigoid was higher than specificity (85–96%). The ELISA titers of anti Dsg1 and 3 were also observed to fall sequentially so was the disease activity score during the follow-up visits at 1 and 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Biochip IIF assay can be used as a screening tool for the serological diagnosis of AIBD and quantitative ELISA for monitoring the disease activity and response to treatment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal Armed Forces India\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 80-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal Armed Forces India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377123722000764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal Armed Forces India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377123722000764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An observational study to determine the role of indirect immunofluorescence and ELISA for desmogleins in the diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune bullous disorders

Background

Autoimmune bullous disorder (AIBD) is a diverse group of blistering dermatoses that affects the skin and mucous membrane, characterized by the formation of autoantibodies against the desmosomal glycoproteins and adhesion molecular components of the basement membrane zone. Various immunoassay techniques for serological diagnosis are Direct Immunofluorescence (DIF), Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF), Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting. Quantitative ELISA titer can also be used to monitor the disease activity and response to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of IIF in diagnosing various AIBDs and the role of ELISA for desmogleins in monitoring disease activity in the pemphigus group of disorders.

Methods

A total of 45 patients with freshly diagnosed AIBD were included in the study. Skin biopsies were done to establish the diagnosis by histopathology and DIF. BIOCHIP-based IIF assay was performed on the sera of the patient. The sensitivity and specificity of the IIF assay were then calculated based on the established diagnosis by Histopathological examination (HPE) and DIF. Quantitative ELISA titer was performed to measure the antibody (anti desmoglein (Dsg) 1 and 3) titre in serum samples of patients with pemphigus at baseline, 1 and 3 months follow-up after initiation of appropriate treatment therapy and results were then compared with disease activity scoring system.

Results

Sensitivity and specificity of IIF for Dsg 1 for the pemphigus group were derived to be 85.7% and 98.2% respectively, while that for Dsg 3 were 100% and 98.7%, respectively. Sensitivity (90–100%) of IIF for Bullous pemphigoid was higher than specificity (85–96%). The ELISA titers of anti Dsg1 and 3 were also observed to fall sequentially so was the disease activity score during the follow-up visits at 1 and 3 months.

Conclusion

Biochip IIF assay can be used as a screening tool for the serological diagnosis of AIBD and quantitative ELISA for monitoring the disease activity and response to treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal Armed Forces India
Medical Journal Armed Forces India Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: This journal was conceived in 1945 as the Journal of Indian Army Medical Corps. Col DR Thapar was the first Editor who published it on behalf of Lt. Gen Gordon Wilson, the then Director of Medical Services in India. Over the years the journal has achieved various milestones. Presently it is published in Vancouver style, printed on offset, and has a distribution exceeding 5000 per issue. It is published in January, April, July and October each year.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of different combinations of phenoxetol and formaldehyde on preservation of histological features in human cadaveric tissues Vexatious and euphemistic affairs in retractions of scientific publications: A pilot study An observational study to determine the role of indirect immunofluorescence and ELISA for desmogleins in the diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune bullous disorders Renal limited sarcoidosis presenting with acute kidney injury Video bronchoscopic electrocautery fulguration of endobronchial carcinoids: Case series from an Indian tertiary care center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1