Cauby Medeiros-Neto, Rodrigo Amorim Barbosa, Daniel Schmitt, Tiago Miqueloto, Sila Carneiro da Silva, André Fischer Sbrissia
{"title":"混合草:热带地区传统牧场单一栽培的替代选择","authors":"Cauby Medeiros-Neto, Rodrigo Amorim Barbosa, Daniel Schmitt, Tiago Miqueloto, Sila Carneiro da Silva, André Fischer Sbrissia","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A two-year experiment assessed herbage production and above- and below-ground characteristics of a highly productive monoculture (‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass [<i>Panicum maximum</i> Jacq.]) and two mixtures of three grasses (Mixture 1: ‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass, ‘BRS Xaraés’ palisadegrass [<i>Brachiaria brizantha</i> Stapf.], and ‘Basilisk’ signalgrass [<i>Brachiaria decumbens</i> Stapf.]; Mixture 2: ‘BRS Quênia’ guineagrass [<i>Panicum maximum</i> Jacq.], ‘Marandu’ palisadegrass [<i>Brachiaria brizantha</i> Stapf.], and ‘BRS Paiaguás’ palisadegrass [<i>Brachiaria brizantha</i> Stapf.]), cultivated in the Brazilian tropical savanna. Mixtures 1 and 2 were subjected to two grazing intensities (removal of 40 or 60% of pre-grazing height) and ‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass monoculture was defoliated to a single grazing intensity of 50%. Treatments were randomly assigned to fifteen 0.25-ha plots and managed under intermittent stocking by cattle. Herbage accumulation rate was similar among pastures and years (<i>p</i> > .1). The root mass in the tussocks did not differ (<i>p</i> > .1), with mean values ranging between 0.62 to 1.81 kg DM m<sup>−2</sup>. Root density in the tussock interspaces was greater in the mixtures (<i>p</i> < .001), regardless of seasons (<i>p</i> = .405) and years (<i>p</i> = .292). The mixtures were dominated by guineagrass (70%) and palisadegrass (30%) at the end of the experiment, with the population of ‘Basilisk’ and ‘BRS Paiaguás’ being completely suppressed throughout the experimental period. Mixing guineagrass and brachiariagrasses can be an alternative to the traditional pastoral systems in the tropics, as it does not compromise herbage production and presents a capacity to produce more roots than a very productive monoculture of ‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixtures of grasses: An alternative to traditional pasture monocultures in the tropics\",\"authors\":\"Cauby Medeiros-Neto, Rodrigo Amorim Barbosa, Daniel Schmitt, Tiago Miqueloto, Sila Carneiro da Silva, André Fischer Sbrissia\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gfs.12605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A two-year experiment assessed herbage production and above- and below-ground characteristics of a highly productive monoculture (‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass [<i>Panicum maximum</i> Jacq.]) and two mixtures of three grasses (Mixture 1: ‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass, ‘BRS Xaraés’ palisadegrass [<i>Brachiaria brizantha</i> Stapf.], and ‘Basilisk’ signalgrass [<i>Brachiaria decumbens</i> Stapf.]; Mixture 2: ‘BRS Quênia’ guineagrass [<i>Panicum maximum</i> Jacq.], ‘Marandu’ palisadegrass [<i>Brachiaria brizantha</i> Stapf.], and ‘BRS Paiaguás’ palisadegrass [<i>Brachiaria brizantha</i> Stapf.]), cultivated in the Brazilian tropical savanna. Mixtures 1 and 2 were subjected to two grazing intensities (removal of 40 or 60% of pre-grazing height) and ‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass monoculture was defoliated to a single grazing intensity of 50%. Treatments were randomly assigned to fifteen 0.25-ha plots and managed under intermittent stocking by cattle. Herbage accumulation rate was similar among pastures and years (<i>p</i> > .1). The root mass in the tussocks did not differ (<i>p</i> > .1), with mean values ranging between 0.62 to 1.81 kg DM m<sup>−2</sup>. Root density in the tussock interspaces was greater in the mixtures (<i>p</i> < .001), regardless of seasons (<i>p</i> = .405) and years (<i>p</i> = .292). The mixtures were dominated by guineagrass (70%) and palisadegrass (30%) at the end of the experiment, with the population of ‘Basilisk’ and ‘BRS Paiaguás’ being completely suppressed throughout the experimental period. Mixing guineagrass and brachiariagrasses can be an alternative to the traditional pastoral systems in the tropics, as it does not compromise herbage production and presents a capacity to produce more roots than a very productive monoculture of ‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12605\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
一项为期两年的试验评估了一种高产单一栽培(' BRS Zuri '豚草[Panicum maximum Jacq.])和两种三种草的混合物(混合物1:' BRS Zuri '豚草,' BRS xarasamas '围栏草[Brachiaria brizantha Stapf.])的牧草产量和地上和地下特征。和“蛇怪”信号草[Brachiaria decumbens Stapf.];混合物2:' BRS Quênia '豚草[Panicum maximum Jacq.]], ' Marandu '栅栏草[Brachiaria brizantha Stapf]。]和' BRS Paiaguás ' palisadegrass [Brachiaria brizantha Stapf.]),种植在巴西热带稀树草原。组合1和组合2的放牧强度分别为放牧前高度的40%和60%,“BRS Zuri”单一栽培豚草的落叶强度为50%。随机分配15个0.25公顷的处理地块,间歇放养。牧草积累速率在不同的牧场和年份之间相似(p > 1)。两株株的根质量没有差异(p > 1),平均值在0.62 ~ 1.81 kg DM m - 2之间。无论季节(p = .405)和年份(p = .292),混交林间的根密度都大于混交林(p < .001)。实验结束时,混合药剂以豚草(70%)和palisadegrass(30%)为主,‘Basilisk’和‘BRS Paiaguás’的种群在整个实验期间都被完全抑制。混合种植豚草和腕足草可以替代热带地区传统的牧区系统,因为它不会影响牧草生产,并且比非常高产的单一栽培“BRS Zuri”豚草能够产生更多的根。
Mixtures of grasses: An alternative to traditional pasture monocultures in the tropics
A two-year experiment assessed herbage production and above- and below-ground characteristics of a highly productive monoculture (‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass [Panicum maximum Jacq.]) and two mixtures of three grasses (Mixture 1: ‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass, ‘BRS Xaraés’ palisadegrass [Brachiaria brizantha Stapf.], and ‘Basilisk’ signalgrass [Brachiaria decumbens Stapf.]; Mixture 2: ‘BRS Quênia’ guineagrass [Panicum maximum Jacq.], ‘Marandu’ palisadegrass [Brachiaria brizantha Stapf.], and ‘BRS Paiaguás’ palisadegrass [Brachiaria brizantha Stapf.]), cultivated in the Brazilian tropical savanna. Mixtures 1 and 2 were subjected to two grazing intensities (removal of 40 or 60% of pre-grazing height) and ‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass monoculture was defoliated to a single grazing intensity of 50%. Treatments were randomly assigned to fifteen 0.25-ha plots and managed under intermittent stocking by cattle. Herbage accumulation rate was similar among pastures and years (p > .1). The root mass in the tussocks did not differ (p > .1), with mean values ranging between 0.62 to 1.81 kg DM m−2. Root density in the tussock interspaces was greater in the mixtures (p < .001), regardless of seasons (p = .405) and years (p = .292). The mixtures were dominated by guineagrass (70%) and palisadegrass (30%) at the end of the experiment, with the population of ‘Basilisk’ and ‘BRS Paiaguás’ being completely suppressed throughout the experimental period. Mixing guineagrass and brachiariagrasses can be an alternative to the traditional pastoral systems in the tropics, as it does not compromise herbage production and presents a capacity to produce more roots than a very productive monoculture of ‘BRS Zuri’ guineagrass.
期刊介绍:
Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.