最小波动策略的拥挤、容量和估值

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Index Investing Pub Date : 2017-02-28 DOI:10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.041
Andrew Ang, Ananth Madhavan, A. Sobczyk
{"title":"最小波动策略的拥挤、容量和估值","authors":"Andrew Ang, Ananth Madhavan, A. Sobczyk","doi":"10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Minimum volatility (min vol) strategies are smart beta strategies that are designed to minimize risk. In the past 12 months, ending June 30, 2016, there were $7.8 billion flows into a total of 17 U.S.-equity exchange-traded fund min vol strategies. This represents just 0.04% of total equity market capitalization of the underlying securities. Capacity in these strategies is large because traditional active mutual funds tend to overweight high-volatility stocks. Were these funds to move to a neutral position in high-volatility securities, a shift of roughly $600 billion to min vol would take place. Current valuations of min vol strategies are not high relative to historical norms and are consistent with the observed outperformance of these strategies during periods of high uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.041","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crowding, Capacity, and Valuation of Minimum Volatility Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Ang, Ananth Madhavan, A. Sobczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Minimum volatility (min vol) strategies are smart beta strategies that are designed to minimize risk. In the past 12 months, ending June 30, 2016, there were $7.8 billion flows into a total of 17 U.S.-equity exchange-traded fund min vol strategies. This represents just 0.04% of total equity market capitalization of the underlying securities. Capacity in these strategies is large because traditional active mutual funds tend to overweight high-volatility stocks. Were these funds to move to a neutral position in high-volatility securities, a shift of roughly $600 billion to min vol would take place. Current valuations of min vol strategies are not high relative to historical norms and are consistent with the observed outperformance of these strategies during periods of high uncertainty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.041\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

最小波动率(min-vol)策略是智能贝塔策略,旨在将风险降至最低。在截至2016年6月30日的过去12个月里,共有78亿美元流入美国股票交易所交易基金的min-vol策略。这仅占标的证券总股本的0.04%。这些策略的容量很大,因为传统的主动型共同基金倾向于增持高波动性股票。如果这些基金在高波动性证券中转向中性头寸,将发生大约6000亿美元的向最小容量的转移。相对于历史规范,最小容量策略的当前估值并不高,并且与在高不确定性时期观察到的这些策略的优异表现一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Crowding, Capacity, and Valuation of Minimum Volatility Strategies
Minimum volatility (min vol) strategies are smart beta strategies that are designed to minimize risk. In the past 12 months, ending June 30, 2016, there were $7.8 billion flows into a total of 17 U.S.-equity exchange-traded fund min vol strategies. This represents just 0.04% of total equity market capitalization of the underlying securities. Capacity in these strategies is large because traditional active mutual funds tend to overweight high-volatility stocks. Were these funds to move to a neutral position in high-volatility securities, a shift of roughly $600 billion to min vol would take place. Current valuations of min vol strategies are not high relative to historical norms and are consistent with the observed outperformance of these strategies during periods of high uncertainty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Index Investing
Journal of Index Investing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Refusal as Repair Australia in the World’s Art Colonies 1900—Pyrrhic Victory Fugitive Abstraction Destruction or Secession?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1