{"title":"加拿大的时效占有法不一致吗?尼尔森(曼城)vs莫瓦特2017 SCC 8","authors":"Mohammud Jaamae Hafeez-Baig, Jordan English","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2017.1404671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Nelson (City) v Mowatt 2017 SCC 8, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the inconsistent use test forms no part of the law of British Columbia. This note surveys and critiques the Court’s reasoning, and argues that the spirit of the decision should be followed in the other provinces. Using the law of Ontario as a case study, it argues that the existence of the inconsistent use test is contrary to both legal history and precedent.","PeriodicalId":35148,"journal":{"name":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"290 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2017.1404671","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An inconsistency in the Canadian law of adverse possession? Nelson (City) v Mowatt 2017 SCC 8\",\"authors\":\"Mohammud Jaamae Hafeez-Baig, Jordan English\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14729342.2017.1404671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In Nelson (City) v Mowatt 2017 SCC 8, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the inconsistent use test forms no part of the law of British Columbia. This note surveys and critiques the Court’s reasoning, and argues that the spirit of the decision should be followed in the other provinces. Using the law of Ontario as a case study, it argues that the existence of the inconsistent use test is contrary to both legal history and precedent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"290 - 300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2017.1404671\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2017.1404671\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2017.1404671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在Nelson (City) v Mowatt 2017 SCC 8案中，加拿大最高法院认为不一致使用检验不构成不列颠哥伦比亚省法律的一部分。本说明对法院的推理进行了调查和批评，并认为其他省份应遵循该决定的精神。本文以安大略省的法律为例，论证了不一致使用检验的存在既违反了法律历史，也违反了先例。
An inconsistency in the Canadian law of adverse possession? Nelson (City) v Mowatt 2017 SCC 8
ABSTRACT In Nelson (City) v Mowatt 2017 SCC 8, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the inconsistent use test forms no part of the law of British Columbia. This note surveys and critiques the Court’s reasoning, and argues that the spirit of the decision should be followed in the other provinces. Using the law of Ontario as a case study, it argues that the existence of the inconsistent use test is contrary to both legal history and precedent.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
