{"title":"板状拓扑互锁结构的挠度极限","authors":"Silvan Ullmann, David S. Kammer, Shai Feldfogel","doi":"10.1115/1.4063345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Topologically Interlocked Structures (TIS) are structural assemblies that achieve stability and carrying capacity through the geometric arrangement of interlocking blocks, relying solely on contact and friction forces for load transfer. Unlike beam-like TIS, whose deflection never exceeds the height of the blocks, the deflection of slab-like TIS often does. Yet, the upper limit of deflection of slab-like TIS, a key parameter defining their loading energy capacity, remains unexplored. Here, we establish a theoretical upper bound for the deflection capacity of slab-like TIS and outline a systematic design strategy to approach this upper bound. This strategy is based on engineering the contact interfaces such that the non-central blocks are more engaged in the structural response, leading to a more global and holistic deformation mode with higher deflections. We demonstrate the application of this strategy in a numerical case study on a typical slab-like TIS and show that it leads to a 350% increase in deflection, yielding a value closer to the upper bound than previously reported in the literature. We find that the resulting deflection mode engages all the blocks equally, avoids localized sliding modes, and resembles that of monolithic equivalents. Lastly, we show that the strategy not only maximizes TIS' deflection capacity but also its loading energy capacity.","PeriodicalId":54880,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The deflection limit of slab-like topologically interlocked structures\",\"authors\":\"Silvan Ullmann, David S. Kammer, Shai Feldfogel\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Topologically Interlocked Structures (TIS) are structural assemblies that achieve stability and carrying capacity through the geometric arrangement of interlocking blocks, relying solely on contact and friction forces for load transfer. Unlike beam-like TIS, whose deflection never exceeds the height of the blocks, the deflection of slab-like TIS often does. Yet, the upper limit of deflection of slab-like TIS, a key parameter defining their loading energy capacity, remains unexplored. Here, we establish a theoretical upper bound for the deflection capacity of slab-like TIS and outline a systematic design strategy to approach this upper bound. This strategy is based on engineering the contact interfaces such that the non-central blocks are more engaged in the structural response, leading to a more global and holistic deformation mode with higher deflections. We demonstrate the application of this strategy in a numerical case study on a typical slab-like TIS and show that it leads to a 350% increase in deflection, yielding a value closer to the upper bound than previously reported in the literature. We find that the resulting deflection mode engages all the blocks equally, avoids localized sliding modes, and resembles that of monolithic equivalents. Lastly, we show that the strategy not only maximizes TIS' deflection capacity but also its loading energy capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063345\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The deflection limit of slab-like topologically interlocked structures
Topologically Interlocked Structures (TIS) are structural assemblies that achieve stability and carrying capacity through the geometric arrangement of interlocking blocks, relying solely on contact and friction forces for load transfer. Unlike beam-like TIS, whose deflection never exceeds the height of the blocks, the deflection of slab-like TIS often does. Yet, the upper limit of deflection of slab-like TIS, a key parameter defining their loading energy capacity, remains unexplored. Here, we establish a theoretical upper bound for the deflection capacity of slab-like TIS and outline a systematic design strategy to approach this upper bound. This strategy is based on engineering the contact interfaces such that the non-central blocks are more engaged in the structural response, leading to a more global and holistic deformation mode with higher deflections. We demonstrate the application of this strategy in a numerical case study on a typical slab-like TIS and show that it leads to a 350% increase in deflection, yielding a value closer to the upper bound than previously reported in the literature. We find that the resulting deflection mode engages all the blocks equally, avoids localized sliding modes, and resembles that of monolithic equivalents. Lastly, we show that the strategy not only maximizes TIS' deflection capacity but also its loading energy capacity.
期刊介绍:
All areas of theoretical and applied mechanics including, but not limited to: Aerodynamics; Aeroelasticity; Biomechanics; Boundary layers; Composite materials; Computational mechanics; Constitutive modeling of materials; Dynamics; Elasticity; Experimental mechanics; Flow and fracture; Heat transport in fluid flows; Hydraulics; Impact; Internal flow; Mechanical properties of materials; Mechanics of shocks; Micromechanics; Nanomechanics; Plasticity; Stress analysis; Structures; Thermodynamics of materials and in flowing fluids; Thermo-mechanics; Turbulence; Vibration; Wave propagation