沃森先生,过来,我要见你:一个农村住院医师项目在疫情期间迅速转向远程医疗

W. Crump, Diana M Nims, D. Hatler
{"title":"沃森先生,过来,我要见你:一个农村住院医师项目在疫情期间迅速转向远程医疗","authors":"W. Crump, Diana M Nims, D. Hatler","doi":"10.33470/2379-9536.1314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Telemedicine has been used for over a generation, but application has been limited in rural areas due to lack of payment, licensure issues, cumbersome video equipment, and challenges with digital communications. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, our rural family medicine residency made a rapid shift to all telemedicine services for our patients. We collected data over a four-week period in April 2020 as we transitioned to 100% telemedicine consultations. We compare that to a four-week period prior to mid-March when COVID-related shutdowns began. We collected detailed visit summaries, patient feedback, and physician feedback to compare these two periods. Early in the pandemic, telemedicine visits increased for those with chronic respiratory and cardiovascular issues, anxiety, and depression. Patient and physician feedback was positive, and time required averaged 12 to 18 minutes. The cost savings from the 15% of telemedicine patients who would have otherwise sought urgent or emergency care is significant, and almost 45% would have still made an appointment later, further risking exposure and increasing outpatient volume. In this sense, telemedicine could be considered to have “flattened the curve” for potentially overwhelmed outpatient facilities just as mitigation interventions were implemented to do the same for acute inpatient beds. We share our experience for consideration by those who will implement a similar transition and those who choose to advocate for continuing payment and platform flexibility. We also hope that residency training requirements can adapt to consider a telemedicine visit comparable to one completed in-person.","PeriodicalId":93035,"journal":{"name":"Marshall journal of medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mr. Watson, come here-I want to see you: One rural residency program’s rapid pivot to telemedicine during the pandemic\",\"authors\":\"W. Crump, Diana M Nims, D. Hatler\",\"doi\":\"10.33470/2379-9536.1314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Telemedicine has been used for over a generation, but application has been limited in rural areas due to lack of payment, licensure issues, cumbersome video equipment, and challenges with digital communications. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, our rural family medicine residency made a rapid shift to all telemedicine services for our patients. We collected data over a four-week period in April 2020 as we transitioned to 100% telemedicine consultations. We compare that to a four-week period prior to mid-March when COVID-related shutdowns began. We collected detailed visit summaries, patient feedback, and physician feedback to compare these two periods. Early in the pandemic, telemedicine visits increased for those with chronic respiratory and cardiovascular issues, anxiety, and depression. Patient and physician feedback was positive, and time required averaged 12 to 18 minutes. The cost savings from the 15% of telemedicine patients who would have otherwise sought urgent or emergency care is significant, and almost 45% would have still made an appointment later, further risking exposure and increasing outpatient volume. In this sense, telemedicine could be considered to have “flattened the curve” for potentially overwhelmed outpatient facilities just as mitigation interventions were implemented to do the same for acute inpatient beds. We share our experience for consideration by those who will implement a similar transition and those who choose to advocate for continuing payment and platform flexibility. We also hope that residency training requirements can adapt to consider a telemedicine visit comparable to one completed in-person.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marshall journal of medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marshall journal of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33470/2379-9536.1314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marshall journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33470/2379-9536.1314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

远程医疗已经使用了一代多人,但由于缺乏支付、许可证问题、笨重的视频设备以及数字通信的挑战,远程医疗在农村地区的应用受到限制。在新冠肺炎大流行初期,我们的农村家庭医学住院医生迅速转向为患者提供所有远程医疗服务。2020年4月,当我们过渡到100%远程医疗咨询时,我们收集了四周的数据。我们将其与3月中旬新冠肺炎相关停工开始前的四周时间进行了比较。我们收集了详细的就诊总结、患者反馈和医生反馈,以比较这两个时期。在疫情早期,那些患有慢性呼吸和心血管问题、焦虑和抑郁的人的远程医疗就诊次数增加了。患者和医生的反馈是积极的,所需时间平均为12-18分钟。15%的远程医疗患者原本会寻求紧急或紧急护理,这节省了大量成本,近45%的患者稍后仍会预约,这进一步增加了暴露风险并增加了门诊量。从这个意义上说,远程医疗可以被认为已经为可能不堪重负的门诊设施“拉平了曲线”,就像对急性住院病床实施缓解干预一样。我们分享我们的经验,供那些将实施类似过渡的人和那些选择倡导持续支付和平台灵活性的人考虑。我们还希望住院医师培训要求能够进行调整,以考虑与亲自完成的远程医疗访问类似的远程医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mr. Watson, come here-I want to see you: One rural residency program’s rapid pivot to telemedicine during the pandemic
Telemedicine has been used for over a generation, but application has been limited in rural areas due to lack of payment, licensure issues, cumbersome video equipment, and challenges with digital communications. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, our rural family medicine residency made a rapid shift to all telemedicine services for our patients. We collected data over a four-week period in April 2020 as we transitioned to 100% telemedicine consultations. We compare that to a four-week period prior to mid-March when COVID-related shutdowns began. We collected detailed visit summaries, patient feedback, and physician feedback to compare these two periods. Early in the pandemic, telemedicine visits increased for those with chronic respiratory and cardiovascular issues, anxiety, and depression. Patient and physician feedback was positive, and time required averaged 12 to 18 minutes. The cost savings from the 15% of telemedicine patients who would have otherwise sought urgent or emergency care is significant, and almost 45% would have still made an appointment later, further risking exposure and increasing outpatient volume. In this sense, telemedicine could be considered to have “flattened the curve” for potentially overwhelmed outpatient facilities just as mitigation interventions were implemented to do the same for acute inpatient beds. We share our experience for consideration by those who will implement a similar transition and those who choose to advocate for continuing payment and platform flexibility. We also hope that residency training requirements can adapt to consider a telemedicine visit comparable to one completed in-person.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Management of Cryptogenic Stroke secondary to large ASD with percutaneous Occluder Device and Antiplatelet drugs. Ogilvie's Syndrome: Acute Colonic Pseudoobstruction. A Review for Residents. Overcoming Communication Challenges: Training Family Medicine Interns Amidst COVID-19 A Case of Occlusive Myocardial Infarction Caused by Nephrotic Syndrome in a 26-Year-Old Type 1 Diabetic More Physicians Alone Won’t Solve Rural America’s Health Care Problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1