小檗碱与地塞米松对卵清蛋白致敏豚鼠血液及支气管炎症细胞的影响比较

Esculapio Pub Date : 2021-03-31 DOI:10.51273/ESC21.251717
Syeda Tahira Zaidi, R. Kausar, M. Malik, Javeria Sarfraz, Abdullah Shafiq, S. Chiragh
{"title":"小檗碱与地塞米松对卵清蛋白致敏豚鼠血液及支气管炎症细胞的影响比较","authors":"Syeda Tahira Zaidi, R. Kausar, M. Malik, Javeria Sarfraz, Abdullah Shafiq, S. Chiragh","doi":"10.51273/ESC21.251717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the anti-inflammatory effects of berberine and dexamethasone in ovalbumin sensitized guinea pigs. Methods: This experimental controlled study was conducted in April, 2016 at Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore. Twenty- four healthy guinea pigs were selected for study. Six of these were assigned randomly in each group; normal control, ovalbumin (OVA) sensitized, berberine treated and dexamethasone treated groups. Airway inflammation was induced on day 0 and 14 by OVA injections via peritoneal route and by inhalation on 25th, 26th and 27th day in each group excluding the normal control. Berberine (1.8 mg/kg) and dexamethasone (20 mg/kg) were introduced via peritoneal route 30 minutes earlier to each trial in berberine treated and dexamethasone treated groups respectively. Results: Total leukocyte count (TLC) in blood sample of berberine treated group (9990±1346 mm3) and dexamethasone treated group (9054±1432 mm3) was significantly low than OVA sensitized group (14261±3151 mm3). TLC of broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in berberine treated group (384±26 mm3) and dexamethasone treated group (306±86) mm3 was significantly low than OVA sensitized group (598±110 mm3). Eosinophil percentage in blood of berberine treated (21.50±3.08) and dexamethasone treated (13.33±5.65) groups were significantly low than OVA sensitized group (30.33±6.74), while eosinophil percentage in BAL fluid was 26.00±6.69 and 21.00±7.46 in berberine treated and dexamethasone treated groups respectively with significant difference from OVA sensitized group value of 40.00±7.79. Conclusion: Berberine and dexamethasone both had reduced TLC and eosinophil percentage in both blood and BAL fluid as compared to OVA sensitized group but berberine is less effective than dexamethasone. Keywords: berberine, dexamethasone, asthma, airway inflammation How to cite: Zaidi T.S., Kausar R., Malik M., Sarfraz J., Shafiq A., Chiragh S. Comparison of berberine and dexamethasone on blood and bronchial inflammatory cells of ovalbumin sensitized guinea pigs. Esculapio 202;17(01):34-38","PeriodicalId":11923,"journal":{"name":"Esculapio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Berberine and Dexamethasone on Blood and Bronchial Inflammatory Cells of Ovalbumin Sensitized Guinea Pigs\",\"authors\":\"Syeda Tahira Zaidi, R. Kausar, M. Malik, Javeria Sarfraz, Abdullah Shafiq, S. Chiragh\",\"doi\":\"10.51273/ESC21.251717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the anti-inflammatory effects of berberine and dexamethasone in ovalbumin sensitized guinea pigs. Methods: This experimental controlled study was conducted in April, 2016 at Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore. Twenty- four healthy guinea pigs were selected for study. Six of these were assigned randomly in each group; normal control, ovalbumin (OVA) sensitized, berberine treated and dexamethasone treated groups. Airway inflammation was induced on day 0 and 14 by OVA injections via peritoneal route and by inhalation on 25th, 26th and 27th day in each group excluding the normal control. Berberine (1.8 mg/kg) and dexamethasone (20 mg/kg) were introduced via peritoneal route 30 minutes earlier to each trial in berberine treated and dexamethasone treated groups respectively. Results: Total leukocyte count (TLC) in blood sample of berberine treated group (9990±1346 mm3) and dexamethasone treated group (9054±1432 mm3) was significantly low than OVA sensitized group (14261±3151 mm3). TLC of broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in berberine treated group (384±26 mm3) and dexamethasone treated group (306±86) mm3 was significantly low than OVA sensitized group (598±110 mm3). Eosinophil percentage in blood of berberine treated (21.50±3.08) and dexamethasone treated (13.33±5.65) groups were significantly low than OVA sensitized group (30.33±6.74), while eosinophil percentage in BAL fluid was 26.00±6.69 and 21.00±7.46 in berberine treated and dexamethasone treated groups respectively with significant difference from OVA sensitized group value of 40.00±7.79. Conclusion: Berberine and dexamethasone both had reduced TLC and eosinophil percentage in both blood and BAL fluid as compared to OVA sensitized group but berberine is less effective than dexamethasone. Keywords: berberine, dexamethasone, asthma, airway inflammation How to cite: Zaidi T.S., Kausar R., Malik M., Sarfraz J., Shafiq A., Chiragh S. Comparison of berberine and dexamethasone on blood and bronchial inflammatory cells of ovalbumin sensitized guinea pigs. Esculapio 202;17(01):34-38\",\"PeriodicalId\":11923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Esculapio\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Esculapio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51273/ESC21.251717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esculapio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51273/ESC21.251717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较黄连素和地塞米松对卵清蛋白致敏豚鼠的抗炎作用。方法:本实验对照研究于2016年4月在拉合尔研究生医学院进行。选择24只健康豚鼠进行研究。每组随机分配6个;正常对照组、卵清蛋白(OVA)致敏组、黄连素治疗组和地塞米松治疗组。除正常对照组外,各组在第0天和第14天通过腹膜途径注射OVA并在第25天、第26天和第27天通过吸入诱导气道炎症。黄连素治疗组和地塞米松治疗组分别在每次试验前30分钟通过腹膜途径引入黄连素(1.8mg/kg)和地塞米松(20mg/kg)。结果:黄连素治疗组(9990±1346mm3)和地塞米松治疗组(9054±1432mm3)的总白细胞计数(TLC)显著低于OVA致敏组(14261±3151mm3)。黄连素治疗组(384±26mm3)和地塞米松治疗组(306±86)mm3的支气管肺泡灌洗液TLC显著低于OVA致敏组(598±110mm3)。黄连素治疗组(21.50±3.08)和地塞米松治疗组(13.33±5.65)的血嗜酸性粒细胞百分比显著低于OVA致敏组(30.33±6.74),而黄连素处理组和地塞米松处理组的BAL液中嗜酸粒细胞百分比分别为26.00±6.69和21.00±7.46,与OVA致敏感组的40.00±7.79有显著差异。结论:与OVA致敏组相比,黄连素和地塞米松均能降低血液和BAL液中的TLC和嗜酸性粒细胞百分比,但黄连素的作用不如地塞米松。关键词:黄连素、地塞米松、哮喘、气道炎症如何引用:Zaidi T.S.、Kausar R.、Malik M.、Sarfraz J.、Shafiq A.、Chiragh S.黄连素和地塞米松对卵清蛋白致敏豚鼠血液和支气管炎症细胞的影响比较。Esculapio 202;17(01):34-38
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Berberine and Dexamethasone on Blood and Bronchial Inflammatory Cells of Ovalbumin Sensitized Guinea Pigs
Objective: To compare the anti-inflammatory effects of berberine and dexamethasone in ovalbumin sensitized guinea pigs. Methods: This experimental controlled study was conducted in April, 2016 at Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore. Twenty- four healthy guinea pigs were selected for study. Six of these were assigned randomly in each group; normal control, ovalbumin (OVA) sensitized, berberine treated and dexamethasone treated groups. Airway inflammation was induced on day 0 and 14 by OVA injections via peritoneal route and by inhalation on 25th, 26th and 27th day in each group excluding the normal control. Berberine (1.8 mg/kg) and dexamethasone (20 mg/kg) were introduced via peritoneal route 30 minutes earlier to each trial in berberine treated and dexamethasone treated groups respectively. Results: Total leukocyte count (TLC) in blood sample of berberine treated group (9990±1346 mm3) and dexamethasone treated group (9054±1432 mm3) was significantly low than OVA sensitized group (14261±3151 mm3). TLC of broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in berberine treated group (384±26 mm3) and dexamethasone treated group (306±86) mm3 was significantly low than OVA sensitized group (598±110 mm3). Eosinophil percentage in blood of berberine treated (21.50±3.08) and dexamethasone treated (13.33±5.65) groups were significantly low than OVA sensitized group (30.33±6.74), while eosinophil percentage in BAL fluid was 26.00±6.69 and 21.00±7.46 in berberine treated and dexamethasone treated groups respectively with significant difference from OVA sensitized group value of 40.00±7.79. Conclusion: Berberine and dexamethasone both had reduced TLC and eosinophil percentage in both blood and BAL fluid as compared to OVA sensitized group but berberine is less effective than dexamethasone. Keywords: berberine, dexamethasone, asthma, airway inflammation How to cite: Zaidi T.S., Kausar R., Malik M., Sarfraz J., Shafiq A., Chiragh S. Comparison of berberine and dexamethasone on blood and bronchial inflammatory cells of ovalbumin sensitized guinea pigs. Esculapio 202;17(01):34-38
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Morphometric Measurement of Distance of Nutrient Foramen from Proximal, Distal Ends and Circumferential Diameter at the level of Nutrient Foramen in dry adult Humerii Assessment of Oral Health and Oral Hygiene Practices of Transgender Community in Lahore Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Towards Usage of Sunscreen and Prevention of Skin CancerAmong Doctors of a Tertiary Care Hospital: ACross-Sectional Study Measurement of Harris Hip Scoring During Early post-operative Period in Intertrochanteric Fractures FemurTreated with Dynamic Hip Screw Medical Negligence orMalpractice: Critical Review of Relevant Laws in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1