{"title":"《文献汇编》和《英国十四世纪历史简史》","authors":"T. Smith","doi":"10.7227/bjrl.97.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reconsiders the value of ‘shorter’ chronicles written\n in fourteenth-century England through a case study of the most popular of these,\n the Cronica bona et compendiosa, which survives in more\n manuscripts than most of the chronicles frequently used in scholarship. It\n examines the text’s authorship and narrative to show what it can reveal\n about history writing and ideas of the past, especially as they relate to\n medieval readers. It demonstrates the text’s influence on contemporary\n writers by showing how it was slightly adapted by the important chronicler Henry\n Knighton, which use has so far gone unnoticed. This article also includes an\n appendix listing twenty-three ‘shorter’ histories and their\n manuscripts, nearly all of which have not hitherto been identified.","PeriodicalId":80816,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cronica bona et compendiosa and Shorter Fourteenth-Century Histories of England\",\"authors\":\"T. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/bjrl.97.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reconsiders the value of ‘shorter’ chronicles written\\n in fourteenth-century England through a case study of the most popular of these,\\n the Cronica bona et compendiosa, which survives in more\\n manuscripts than most of the chronicles frequently used in scholarship. It\\n examines the text’s authorship and narrative to show what it can reveal\\n about history writing and ideas of the past, especially as they relate to\\n medieval readers. It demonstrates the text’s influence on contemporary\\n writers by showing how it was slightly adapted by the important chronicler Henry\\n Knighton, which use has so far gone unnoticed. This article also includes an\\n appendix listing twenty-three ‘shorter’ histories and their\\n manuscripts, nearly all of which have not hitherto been identified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.97.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.97.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文通过对其中最受欢迎的编年史(Cronica bona et compendiosa)的案例研究,重新考虑了写于14世纪英国的“较短”编年史的价值,该编年史比学术界经常使用的大多数编年史保存在更多的手稿中。它考察了文本的作者和叙述,以显示它可以揭示历史写作和过去的想法,特别是当它们与中世纪的读者有关。它展示了重要的编年史家亨利·奈特顿(Henry Knighton)如何对其进行了轻微的改编,从而展示了该文本对当代作家的影响,而这些改编迄今为止一直未被注意到。这篇文章还包括一个附录,列出了23个“较短”的历史及其手稿,几乎所有这些都尚未被确定。
The Cronica bona et compendiosa and Shorter Fourteenth-Century Histories of England
This article reconsiders the value of ‘shorter’ chronicles written
in fourteenth-century England through a case study of the most popular of these,
the Cronica bona et compendiosa, which survives in more
manuscripts than most of the chronicles frequently used in scholarship. It
examines the text’s authorship and narrative to show what it can reveal
about history writing and ideas of the past, especially as they relate to
medieval readers. It demonstrates the text’s influence on contemporary
writers by showing how it was slightly adapted by the important chronicler Henry
Knighton, which use has so far gone unnoticed. This article also includes an
appendix listing twenty-three ‘shorter’ histories and their
manuscripts, nearly all of which have not hitherto been identified.