{"title":"不经多普勒切除前外侧大腿进行头颈部重建术:是否有风险?","authors":"Georgia-Alexandra Spyropoulou , Konstantinos Vahtsevanos , Konstantinos Antoniades , Eleni Karagergou , Sofia Papadopoulou , Efterpi Demiri","doi":"10.1016/j.omsc.2023.100304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) is used as a workhorse flap for head and neck reconstruction. The most used method to map the perforators nowadays is hand-held Doppler although several more sophisticated techniques have been described. This paper is to investigate whether harvesting the ALT flap without preoperative mapping is safe.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Twenty consecutive patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: A or B. Patients of A group (n = 10) were marked before the operation with the use of a Doppler probe whilst patients of group B (n = 10) were not marked preoperatively using Doppler to detect the perforators. Complications and time of ALT dissection were documented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistical difference of complications between the two groups. Mean time of flap harvesting (skin incision up to main pedicle) was approximately 140 min in group A and 165 min in group B (statistically significantly less in group A p = 0.008).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This paper is an indication that harvesting the ALT flap without preoperative mapping, even with hand-held Doppler, does not compromise safety of the procedure although operative time is prolonged.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38030,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 100304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anterolateral thigh harvesting for head and neck reconstruction without Doppler: Risky or not?\",\"authors\":\"Georgia-Alexandra Spyropoulou , Konstantinos Vahtsevanos , Konstantinos Antoniades , Eleni Karagergou , Sofia Papadopoulou , Efterpi Demiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omsc.2023.100304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) is used as a workhorse flap for head and neck reconstruction. The most used method to map the perforators nowadays is hand-held Doppler although several more sophisticated techniques have been described. This paper is to investigate whether harvesting the ALT flap without preoperative mapping is safe.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Twenty consecutive patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: A or B. Patients of A group (n = 10) were marked before the operation with the use of a Doppler probe whilst patients of group B (n = 10) were not marked preoperatively using Doppler to detect the perforators. Complications and time of ALT dissection were documented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistical difference of complications between the two groups. Mean time of flap harvesting (skin incision up to main pedicle) was approximately 140 min in group A and 165 min in group B (statistically significantly less in group A p = 0.008).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This paper is an indication that harvesting the ALT flap without preoperative mapping, even with hand-held Doppler, does not compromise safety of the procedure although operative time is prolonged.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214541923000135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214541923000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anterolateral thigh harvesting for head and neck reconstruction without Doppler: Risky or not?
Background
Anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) is used as a workhorse flap for head and neck reconstruction. The most used method to map the perforators nowadays is hand-held Doppler although several more sophisticated techniques have been described. This paper is to investigate whether harvesting the ALT flap without preoperative mapping is safe.
Materials and methods
Twenty consecutive patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: A or B. Patients of A group (n = 10) were marked before the operation with the use of a Doppler probe whilst patients of group B (n = 10) were not marked preoperatively using Doppler to detect the perforators. Complications and time of ALT dissection were documented.
Results
There was no statistical difference of complications between the two groups. Mean time of flap harvesting (skin incision up to main pedicle) was approximately 140 min in group A and 165 min in group B (statistically significantly less in group A p = 0.008).
Conclusions
This paper is an indication that harvesting the ALT flap without preoperative mapping, even with hand-held Doppler, does not compromise safety of the procedure although operative time is prolonged.
期刊介绍:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases is a surgical journal dedicated to publishing case reports and case series only which must be original, educational, rare conditions or findings, or clinically interesting to an international audience of surgeons and clinicians. Case series can be prospective or retrospective and examine the outcomes of management or mechanisms in more than one patient. Case reports may include new or modified methodology and treatment, uncommon findings, and mechanisms. All case reports and case series will be peer reviewed for acceptance for publication in the Journal.