提高动态使用武力场景中火器识别的准确性

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Police Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-08-04 DOI:10.1177/1098611120944387
M. H. Martaindale
{"title":"提高动态使用武力场景中火器识别的准确性","authors":"M. H. Martaindale","doi":"10.1177/1098611120944387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law enforcement officers are sometimes required to make split-second use of force decisions. One factor that can impact their decision-making process is the presence of a weapon. This experiment sought to improve the speed and accuracy of weapon identification in a dynamic use of force scenario through the principles of deliberate practice. This research utilized randomized control trial with random assignment to either a control or test condition. Eighty-seven participants completed the pretest, intervention, and posttest. Participants’ vision was recorded via a mobile vision-tracker. With only 20 minutes of training, the test group made 1/3 the amount of decision errors as the control group (Cohen’s d = 0.95). The test group was about 16% faster than the control group at visually finding the object in the suspect’s hand and determining if it was a gun or not (Cohen’s d = 0.91).","PeriodicalId":47610,"journal":{"name":"Police Quarterly","volume":"24 1","pages":"104 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1098611120944387","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Accuracy of Firearm Identification in a Dynamic Use of Force Scenario\",\"authors\":\"M. H. Martaindale\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1098611120944387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Law enforcement officers are sometimes required to make split-second use of force decisions. One factor that can impact their decision-making process is the presence of a weapon. This experiment sought to improve the speed and accuracy of weapon identification in a dynamic use of force scenario through the principles of deliberate practice. This research utilized randomized control trial with random assignment to either a control or test condition. Eighty-seven participants completed the pretest, intervention, and posttest. Participants’ vision was recorded via a mobile vision-tracker. With only 20 minutes of training, the test group made 1/3 the amount of decision errors as the control group (Cohen’s d = 0.95). The test group was about 16% faster than the control group at visually finding the object in the suspect’s hand and determining if it was a gun or not (Cohen’s d = 0.91).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Police Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"104 - 130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1098611120944387\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Police Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611120944387\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Police Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611120944387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

执法人员有时需要在瞬间做出使用武力的决定。影响他们决策过程的一个因素是武器的存在。本实验旨在通过刻意练习的原则,提高动态使用武力情景下武器识别的速度和准确性。本研究采用随机对照试验,随机分配到对照或试验条件。87名参与者完成了前测、干预和后测。参与者的视力通过移动视觉追踪器记录下来。在20分钟的训练中,实验组的决策错误率是对照组的1/3 (Cohen’s d = 0.95)。试验组在视觉上找到嫌疑犯手中的物体并确定它是否是枪方面比对照组快16% (Cohen’s d = 0.91)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving the Accuracy of Firearm Identification in a Dynamic Use of Force Scenario
Law enforcement officers are sometimes required to make split-second use of force decisions. One factor that can impact their decision-making process is the presence of a weapon. This experiment sought to improve the speed and accuracy of weapon identification in a dynamic use of force scenario through the principles of deliberate practice. This research utilized randomized control trial with random assignment to either a control or test condition. Eighty-seven participants completed the pretest, intervention, and posttest. Participants’ vision was recorded via a mobile vision-tracker. With only 20 minutes of training, the test group made 1/3 the amount of decision errors as the control group (Cohen’s d = 0.95). The test group was about 16% faster than the control group at visually finding the object in the suspect’s hand and determining if it was a gun or not (Cohen’s d = 0.91).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Police Quarterly
Police Quarterly CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Police Quarterly is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes theoretical contributions, empirical studies, essays, comparative analyses, critiques, innovative program descriptions, debates, and book reviews on issues related to policing.
期刊最新文献
Factors Promoting and Inhibiting Use of Wellness Resources Among Police: A Mixed Methods Study Law Enforcement-Based Outreach and Treatment Referral as a Response to Opioid Misuse: Assessing Reductions in Overdoses and Costs The 2020 De-Policing: An Empirical Analysis Sergeant Coffee Needs You: Evaluation of a Police Officer Bystander Intervention Program An Examination of Unintentional Use of Force by the Police
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1