消化道医生和非消化道医生结肠镜检查肠道准备差异的真实评估:一项回顾性研究

Cenqin Liu, Xin Yuan, Hui Gao, Zhixin Zhang, Weihong Wang, Jiarong Xie, Hongpeng Lu, Jing Chen, Chaohui Yu, Lei Xu
{"title":"消化道医生和非消化道医生结肠镜检查肠道准备差异的真实评估:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Cenqin Liu, Xin Yuan, Hui Gao, Zhixin Zhang, Weihong Wang, Jiarong Xie, Hongpeng Lu, Jing Chen, Chaohui Yu, Lei Xu","doi":"10.3389/fgstr.2022.946459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Using real-world data, we compared the quality of bowel preparation instructed by the digestive and non-digestive physicians in outpatients for colonoscopy and identified potential risk factors. Methods This was a retrospective study based on real-world data, which were collected from the Ningbo First Hospital in China from December 2019 to October 2020. Outpatients included were classified into the digestive and the non-digestive physician groups according to the referring physician. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), namely, a BBPS score of 2 or higher in any colonic segment and a total score ≥ 6. Secondary outcomes included the total mean BBPS scores and possible risk factors associated with poor bowel preparation. Results There were 671 outpatients included, with 392 in the digestive physician group and 279 in the non-digestive physician group. Adequate bowel preparation was 84.2% in the digestive physician group and 71.0% in the non-digestive physician group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.50, p < 0.001), and the latter had lower total mean BBPS scores (6.12 ± 1.33 vs. 6.66 ± 1.29, p < 0.001). The non-digestive physician was an independent risk factor according to the multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR: 0.45, p < 0.001). Conclusion The quality of bowel preparations instructed by non-digestive physicians was inferior to digestive physicians, which was a factor potentially associated with poor bowel preparation (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04738578).","PeriodicalId":73085,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-word evaluation of differences in bowel preparation for colonoscopy between the digestive and the non-digestive physicians: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Cenqin Liu, Xin Yuan, Hui Gao, Zhixin Zhang, Weihong Wang, Jiarong Xie, Hongpeng Lu, Jing Chen, Chaohui Yu, Lei Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgstr.2022.946459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Using real-world data, we compared the quality of bowel preparation instructed by the digestive and non-digestive physicians in outpatients for colonoscopy and identified potential risk factors. Methods This was a retrospective study based on real-world data, which were collected from the Ningbo First Hospital in China from December 2019 to October 2020. Outpatients included were classified into the digestive and the non-digestive physician groups according to the referring physician. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), namely, a BBPS score of 2 or higher in any colonic segment and a total score ≥ 6. Secondary outcomes included the total mean BBPS scores and possible risk factors associated with poor bowel preparation. Results There were 671 outpatients included, with 392 in the digestive physician group and 279 in the non-digestive physician group. Adequate bowel preparation was 84.2% in the digestive physician group and 71.0% in the non-digestive physician group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.50, p < 0.001), and the latter had lower total mean BBPS scores (6.12 ± 1.33 vs. 6.66 ± 1.29, p < 0.001). The non-digestive physician was an independent risk factor according to the multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR: 0.45, p < 0.001). Conclusion The quality of bowel preparations instructed by non-digestive physicians was inferior to digestive physicians, which was a factor potentially associated with poor bowel preparation (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04738578).\",\"PeriodicalId\":73085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2022.946459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2022.946459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言利用真实世界的数据,我们比较了消化道和非消化道医生在门诊结肠镜检查中指导的肠道准备质量,并确定了潜在的风险因素。方法回顾性研究基于2019年12月至2020年10月在中国宁波市第一医院收集的真实世界数据。根据转诊医生,门诊患者被分为消化科和非消化科医生组。主要结果是通过波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)测量的充分的肠道准备,即任何结肠段的BBPS评分为2或更高,总分≥6。次要结果包括总平均BBPS评分和与肠道准备不良相关的可能风险因素。结果门诊671例,其中消化内科392例,非消化内科279例。充分的肠道准备在消化科医生组中为84.2%,在非消化科医师组中为71.0%(比值比[OR]:1.50,p<0.001),后者的总平均BBPS评分较低(6.12±1.33 vs.6.66±1.29,p<0.001)。根据多变量逻辑回归分析,非消化科医生是一个独立的危险因素(OR:0.45,p<001),这是一个可能与肠道准备不良有关的因素(ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT04738578)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-word evaluation of differences in bowel preparation for colonoscopy between the digestive and the non-digestive physicians: A retrospective study
Introduction Using real-world data, we compared the quality of bowel preparation instructed by the digestive and non-digestive physicians in outpatients for colonoscopy and identified potential risk factors. Methods This was a retrospective study based on real-world data, which were collected from the Ningbo First Hospital in China from December 2019 to October 2020. Outpatients included were classified into the digestive and the non-digestive physician groups according to the referring physician. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), namely, a BBPS score of 2 or higher in any colonic segment and a total score ≥ 6. Secondary outcomes included the total mean BBPS scores and possible risk factors associated with poor bowel preparation. Results There were 671 outpatients included, with 392 in the digestive physician group and 279 in the non-digestive physician group. Adequate bowel preparation was 84.2% in the digestive physician group and 71.0% in the non-digestive physician group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.50, p < 0.001), and the latter had lower total mean BBPS scores (6.12 ± 1.33 vs. 6.66 ± 1.29, p < 0.001). The non-digestive physician was an independent risk factor according to the multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR: 0.45, p < 0.001). Conclusion The quality of bowel preparations instructed by non-digestive physicians was inferior to digestive physicians, which was a factor potentially associated with poor bowel preparation (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04738578).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current status and clinical applications of tissue engineering of the gastrointestinal tract: a systematized narrative review Fecal microbiota transplantation—could stool donors’ and receptors’ diet be the key to future success? X-ray phase-contrast 3D virtual histology characterises complex tissue architecture in colorectal cancer Adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 is equally effective and safe in long-term management of inflammatory bowel diseases patients when used as first biologic treatment or as replace of the ADA originator for a non-medical reason A blood-based transcriptomic signature stratifies severe Crohn’s disease and defines potentially targetable therapeutic pathways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1