后金融危机时代中国制造企业的商业固定投资

IF 3.7 Q1 ECONOMICS China Economic Journal Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17538963.2019.1700630
P. Yan
{"title":"后金融危机时代中国制造企业的商业固定投资","authors":"P. Yan","doi":"10.1080/17538963.2019.1700630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT I document the investment decline of Chinese manufacturing firms after 2011, following the end of the 4 trillion fiscal stimulus program and expansionary monetary policies for combating the 2008–2009 financial crisis. I employ a difference-in-difference strategy to show that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) acted as investment stabilizers. In the post-crisis era, SOEs’ investment rates fell less compared to their private counterparts. Moreover, they had a smaller chance of exiting the market than private firms. In the face of monetary tightening, SOEs enjoyed a much smaller increase in the interest rates of their long-term debts. Although these may fuel the growth of the SOE sector relative to the private sector, and thus raised concerns for capital misallocation, the adverse effect on reallocation was dampened by shadow banking.","PeriodicalId":45279,"journal":{"name":"China Economic Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"109 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538963.2019.1700630","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Business fixed investment of Chinese manufacturing firms in the post-financial crisis era\",\"authors\":\"P. Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538963.2019.1700630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT I document the investment decline of Chinese manufacturing firms after 2011, following the end of the 4 trillion fiscal stimulus program and expansionary monetary policies for combating the 2008–2009 financial crisis. I employ a difference-in-difference strategy to show that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) acted as investment stabilizers. In the post-crisis era, SOEs’ investment rates fell less compared to their private counterparts. Moreover, they had a smaller chance of exiting the market than private firms. In the face of monetary tightening, SOEs enjoyed a much smaller increase in the interest rates of their long-term debts. Although these may fuel the growth of the SOE sector relative to the private sector, and thus raised concerns for capital misallocation, the adverse effect on reallocation was dampened by shadow banking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Economic Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"109 - 121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538963.2019.1700630\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Economic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2019.1700630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2019.1700630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:我记录了2011年后中国制造业企业的投资下降,此前4万亿财政刺激计划和应对2008-2009年金融危机的扩张性货币政策结束。我采用了差异中的差异策略来表明国有企业充当了投资稳定器。在后危机时代,与私营企业相比,国有企业的投资率下降幅度较小。此外,与私营公司相比,它们退出市场的机会更小。面对货币紧缩,国有企业的长期债务利率增幅要小得多。尽管这可能会推动国有企业部门相对于私营部门的增长,从而引发对资本错配的担忧,但影子银行业抑制了对再分配的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Business fixed investment of Chinese manufacturing firms in the post-financial crisis era
ABSTRACT I document the investment decline of Chinese manufacturing firms after 2011, following the end of the 4 trillion fiscal stimulus program and expansionary monetary policies for combating the 2008–2009 financial crisis. I employ a difference-in-difference strategy to show that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) acted as investment stabilizers. In the post-crisis era, SOEs’ investment rates fell less compared to their private counterparts. Moreover, they had a smaller chance of exiting the market than private firms. In the face of monetary tightening, SOEs enjoyed a much smaller increase in the interest rates of their long-term debts. Although these may fuel the growth of the SOE sector relative to the private sector, and thus raised concerns for capital misallocation, the adverse effect on reallocation was dampened by shadow banking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Enhancing connectivity of rules under the Belt and Road Initiative Assessing infrastructure and trade connectivity through network analysis evidence from BRI countries Biodiversity in China: challenges, efforts and prospects The role of government social media in enhancing environmental governance Environmental monitoring and enforcement in China: an economic perspective review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1