理解黑人音乐治疗学生在临床监督中讨论种族和种族主义的经验

Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1093/mtp/miab027
Janae Phaedra Imeri, J. Jones
{"title":"理解黑人音乐治疗学生在临床监督中讨论种族和种族主义的经验","authors":"Janae Phaedra Imeri, J. Jones","doi":"10.1093/mtp/miab027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The experiences of Black music therapy students discussing race and racism in clinical supervision were explored in this study. Participants included 5 Black music therapy students with at least one semester of supervised fieldwork. Recruitment occurred through varied methods utilizing professional networks and snowballing. Data included written survey responses and individual interviews. Utilizing a thematic analysis approach, researchers reviewed that each participant’s dataset generated preliminary codes. Next, researchers grouped codes and compared groupings across datasets. Researchers reached an agreement on 7 themes. Theme 1 addressed the immense vulnerability it takes for Black students to discuss race in and out of supervision. Theme 2 described defensive behaviors from white supervisors, staff members, and peers in response to discussing race. Theme 3 revealed the significance of validating that racism happens to Black students. Theme 4 noted the power supervisors wield over Black students, the privilege white supervisors possess, instances of racism from supervisors, and retaliation from supervisors in response to conversations of race. Theme 5 uncovered a pattern of white supervisors “acknowledging” their privilege and not acting on this self-discovery. Theme 6 examined participants’ feeling like an outsider and supporting themselves in their education. Theme 7 addressed exasperation due to an unchanging oppressive system. Findings connect to the emerging literature on culturally responsive supervision, provide new insights into the supervision of Black music therapy students, and identify the need for change.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Experience of Discussing Race and Racism During Clinical Supervision for Black Music Therapy Students\",\"authors\":\"Janae Phaedra Imeri, J. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mtp/miab027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The experiences of Black music therapy students discussing race and racism in clinical supervision were explored in this study. Participants included 5 Black music therapy students with at least one semester of supervised fieldwork. Recruitment occurred through varied methods utilizing professional networks and snowballing. Data included written survey responses and individual interviews. Utilizing a thematic analysis approach, researchers reviewed that each participant’s dataset generated preliminary codes. Next, researchers grouped codes and compared groupings across datasets. Researchers reached an agreement on 7 themes. Theme 1 addressed the immense vulnerability it takes for Black students to discuss race in and out of supervision. Theme 2 described defensive behaviors from white supervisors, staff members, and peers in response to discussing race. Theme 3 revealed the significance of validating that racism happens to Black students. Theme 4 noted the power supervisors wield over Black students, the privilege white supervisors possess, instances of racism from supervisors, and retaliation from supervisors in response to conversations of race. Theme 5 uncovered a pattern of white supervisors “acknowledging” their privilege and not acting on this self-discovery. Theme 6 examined participants’ feeling like an outsider and supporting themselves in their education. Theme 7 addressed exasperation due to an unchanging oppressive system. Findings connect to the emerging literature on culturally responsive supervision, provide new insights into the supervision of Black music therapy students, and identify the need for change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/miab027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/miab027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了黑人音乐治疗学生在临床监督中讨论种族和种族主义的经历。参与者包括5名黑人音乐治疗学生,他们至少有一个学期的现场监督。招聘是通过利用专业网络和滚雪球的各种方法进行的。数据包括书面调查答复和个人访谈。利用主题分析方法,研究人员审查了每个参与者的数据集生成的初步代码。接下来,研究人员对代码进行分组,并在数据集之间进行分组比较。研究人员就7个主题达成一致。主题1阐述了黑人学生在监督内外讨论种族问题时所面临的巨大脆弱性。主题2描述了白人主管、工作人员和同龄人在讨论种族问题时的防御行为。主题3揭示了验证种族主义发生在黑人学生身上的重要性。主题4指出了主管对黑人学生行使的权力,白人主管拥有的特权,主管的种族主义事件,以及主管对种族对话的报复。主题5揭示了白人主管“承认”自己的特权而不根据这种自我发现采取行动的模式。主题6考察了参与者作为局外人的感觉以及在教育中对自己的支持。主题7谈到了由于一成不变的压迫制度而引起的愤怒。研究结果与新兴的文化响应监督文献相联系,为黑人音乐治疗学生的监督提供了新的见解,并确定了变革的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Understanding the Experience of Discussing Race and Racism During Clinical Supervision for Black Music Therapy Students
The experiences of Black music therapy students discussing race and racism in clinical supervision were explored in this study. Participants included 5 Black music therapy students with at least one semester of supervised fieldwork. Recruitment occurred through varied methods utilizing professional networks and snowballing. Data included written survey responses and individual interviews. Utilizing a thematic analysis approach, researchers reviewed that each participant’s dataset generated preliminary codes. Next, researchers grouped codes and compared groupings across datasets. Researchers reached an agreement on 7 themes. Theme 1 addressed the immense vulnerability it takes for Black students to discuss race in and out of supervision. Theme 2 described defensive behaviors from white supervisors, staff members, and peers in response to discussing race. Theme 3 revealed the significance of validating that racism happens to Black students. Theme 4 noted the power supervisors wield over Black students, the privilege white supervisors possess, instances of racism from supervisors, and retaliation from supervisors in response to conversations of race. Theme 5 uncovered a pattern of white supervisors “acknowledging” their privilege and not acting on this self-discovery. Theme 6 examined participants’ feeling like an outsider and supporting themselves in their education. Theme 7 addressed exasperation due to an unchanging oppressive system. Findings connect to the emerging literature on culturally responsive supervision, provide new insights into the supervision of Black music therapy students, and identify the need for change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1