随机系数自回归和随机单位根模型的检验

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3358301
Daisuke Nagakura
{"title":"随机系数自回归和随机单位根模型的检验","authors":"Daisuke Nagakura","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3358301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The random coefficient autoregressive model has been utilized for modeling financial time series because it possesses features that are often observed in financial time series. When the mean of the random coefficient is one, it is called the stochastic unit root model. This paper proposes two Lagrange multiplier tests for the null hypotheses of random coefficient autoregressive and stochastic unit root models against a more general model. We apply our Lagrange multiplier tests to several stock index data, and find that the stochastic unit root model is rejected, whereas the random coefficient autoregressive model is not. This result indicates that it is important to check the validity of the stochastic unit root model prior to applying it to financial time series data, which may be better modeled by the random coefficient autoregressive model with the mean being not equal to one.","PeriodicalId":46709,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics","volume":"27 1","pages":"117 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing for random coefficient autoregressive and stochastic unit root models\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Nagakura\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3358301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The random coefficient autoregressive model has been utilized for modeling financial time series because it possesses features that are often observed in financial time series. When the mean of the random coefficient is one, it is called the stochastic unit root model. This paper proposes two Lagrange multiplier tests for the null hypotheses of random coefficient autoregressive and stochastic unit root models against a more general model. We apply our Lagrange multiplier tests to several stock index data, and find that the stochastic unit root model is rejected, whereas the random coefficient autoregressive model is not. This result indicates that it is important to check the validity of the stochastic unit root model prior to applying it to financial time series data, which may be better modeled by the random coefficient autoregressive model with the mean being not equal to one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3358301\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3358301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要随机系数自回归模型由于具有金融时间序列中常见的特征而被用于金融时间序列的建模。当随机系数的均值为1时,称为随机单位根模型。本文针对一个更一般的模型,对随机系数自回归模型和随机单位根模型的原假设进行了两个拉格朗日乘数检验。我们将拉格朗日乘数检验应用于多个股票指数数据,发现随机单位根模型被拒绝,而随机系数自回归模型则不被拒绝。这一结果表明,在将随机单位根模型应用于金融时间序列数据之前,有必要对其有效性进行检验,使用均值不等于1的随机系数自回归模型可能会更好地建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing for random coefficient autoregressive and stochastic unit root models
Abstract The random coefficient autoregressive model has been utilized for modeling financial time series because it possesses features that are often observed in financial time series. When the mean of the random coefficient is one, it is called the stochastic unit root model. This paper proposes two Lagrange multiplier tests for the null hypotheses of random coefficient autoregressive and stochastic unit root models against a more general model. We apply our Lagrange multiplier tests to several stock index data, and find that the stochastic unit root model is rejected, whereas the random coefficient autoregressive model is not. This result indicates that it is important to check the validity of the stochastic unit root model prior to applying it to financial time series data, which may be better modeled by the random coefficient autoregressive model with the mean being not equal to one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics (SNDE) recognizes that advances in statistics and dynamical systems theory may increase our understanding of economic and financial markets. The journal seeks both theoretical and applied papers that characterize and motivate nonlinear phenomena. Researchers are required to assist replication of empirical results by providing copies of data and programs online. Algorithms and rapid communications are also published.
期刊最新文献
Zero-Inflated Autoregressive Conditional Duration Model for Discrete Trade Durations with Excessive Zeros Stability in Threshold VAR Models Co-Jumping of Treasury Yield Curve Rates Determination of the Number of Breaks in High-Dimensional Factor Models via Cross-Validation Comparison of Score-Driven Equity-Gold Portfolios During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Model Confidence Sets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1